Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:04:13 PMif we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...So by that logic, the pass on first down was a bad call at that point, right? Because if not, then Caddy fumbling would not be a bad call at that point like you say, but bad execution, like you say..See the paradox there?
if we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:04:13 PMQuote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:35:19 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:32:04 PMQuote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:27:27 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?If the play call worked, we would have had 7No, if the guys executed we sould have 7 ... the play was there .... he can't throw it and catch it too ... geez you guys are ridiculous ....Execution risk is part of the playcallnot really ... execution is execution ... maybe you can question player development/coaching or whatever, but that play has been successful plenty of times ... no reason not to assume that the NFL QB can get it to the NFL TE and the NFL TE can catch it ... again this wasn't something crazy being called for two guys off the street ....if we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...Gruden could dial up Grads throwing bombs to Galloway on a fly route all day long, but if Grads continues to miss them because he has no arm, do you blame that all on his execution?ÂÂ
Quote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:35:19 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:32:04 PMQuote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:27:27 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?If the play call worked, we would have had 7No, if the guys executed we sould have 7 ... the play was there .... he can't throw it and catch it too ... geez you guys are ridiculous ....Execution risk is part of the playcallnot really ... execution is execution ... maybe you can question player development/coaching or whatever, but that play has been successful plenty of times ... no reason not to assume that the NFL QB can get it to the NFL TE and the NFL TE can catch it ... again this wasn't something crazy being called for two guys off the street ....if we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:32:04 PMQuote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:27:27 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?If the play call worked, we would have had 7No, if the guys executed we sould have 7 ... the play was there .... he can't throw it and catch it too ... geez you guys are ridiculous ....Execution risk is part of the playcall
Quote from: bradentonian on December 11, 2008, 02:27:27 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?If the play call worked, we would have had 7No, if the guys executed we sould have 7 ... the play was there .... he can't throw it and catch it too ... geez you guys are ridiculous ....
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?If the play call worked, we would have had 7
Smith was open ... the play worked ... Garcia/Smith didn't get it doneIt's Thursday for crying out loud. When are you guys going to get over it and move on?
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:07:02 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 11, 2008, 03:06:26 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:04:13 PMif we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...By the same extension, wouldn't that be bad execution and not a bad play call? bingo .... Then why have a coach? If the players fail it's their fault for not executing, anyways.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 11, 2008, 03:06:26 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:04:13 PMif we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...By the same extension, wouldn't that be bad execution and not a bad play call? bingo ....
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:04:13 PMif we give it to Caddy on 1st down and the play gets blown up in the back field and he fumbles it away, was that a bad play call at that point ...By the same extension, wouldn't that be bad execution and not a bad play call?
It was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.That means the flubbed pass on first down was also a bad call, for whatever reason it failed..
I think people would just prefer the Bucs live and die with the highest paid center in the league, two "future pro bowl" guards, Jeremy "the next Jon Runyan" Trueblood, a legit pro bowl alternate at fullback, and a top 5 pick running back, than Jeff "Journeyman" Garcia and Alex "new team in 2009" Smith. We're assuming there's a reason the Bucs made acquiring those players a priority.
there's bad play calls of course ... but calling a PA on the goal line isn't one of them by a long shot ....
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.I think people would just prefer the Bucs live and die with the highest paid center in the league, two "future pro bowl" guards, Jeremy "the next Jon Runyan" Trueblood, a legit pro bowl alternate at fullback, and a top 5 pick running back, than Jeff "Journeyman" Garcia and Alex "new team in 2009" Smith. We're assuming there's a reason the Bucs made acquiring those players a priority.
Quote from: RedAlert on December 11, 2008, 03:21:30 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.That means the flubbed pass on first down was also a bad call, for whatever reason it failed..are you slow? that's your guys stance .. .not mine ....
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:20:02 PMthere's bad play calls of course ... but calling a PA on the goal line isn't one of them by a long shot ....no, but many believe that running the ball is a safer and more effective option when only 2 yards are needed.
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:24:18 PMQuote from: RedAlert on December 11, 2008, 03:21:30 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.That means the flubbed pass on first down was also a bad call, for whatever reason it failed..are you slow? that's your guys stance .. .not mine ....So your stance is that a run play that doesn't work is a bad call, and a pass play that doesn't is bad execution?Just trying to clear it up..
I think that people prefer that the HC that we traded 4 draft picks and what $8 million for plus pay another 3 million+ adn who has won �Super Bowl plus multiple division titles makes the play calls and not schmucks like you or I on a message board ... I would assume there's a reason the Glazers made the investment in him that they did.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 11, 2008, 03:21:53 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.I think people would just prefer the Bucs live and die with the highest paid center in the league, two "future pro bowl" guards, Jeremy "the next Jon Runyan" Trueblood, a legit pro bowl alternate at fullback, and a top 5 pick running back, than Jeff "Journeyman" Garcia and Alex "new team in 2009" Smith. We're assuming there's a reason the Bucs made acquiring those players a priority. I think that people prefer that the HC that we traded 4 draft picks and what $8 million for plus pay another 3 million+ adn who has won �Super Bowl plus multiple division titles makes the play calls and not schmucks like you or I on a message board ... I would assume there's a reason the Glazers made the investment in him that they did.
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:28:37 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 11, 2008, 03:21:53 PMQuote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 03:16:06 PMIt was a simple question to the poster that told me execution was a part of the play call ... you guys insist that the right play call would have been to run ... if it got blown up because of poor blocking/missed assignmment and Caddy turned it over, would it have suddenly been a bad play call.I think people would just prefer the Bucs live and die with the highest paid center in the league, two "future pro bowl" guards, Jeremy "the next Jon Runyan" Trueblood, a legit pro bowl alternate at fullback, and a top 5 pick running back, than Jeff "Journeyman" Garcia and Alex "new team in 2009" Smith. We're assuming there's a reason the Bucs made acquiring those players a priority. I think that people prefer that the HC that we traded 4 draft picks and what $8 million for plus pay another 3 million+ adn who has won �Super Bowl plus multiple division titles makes the play calls and not schmucks like you or I on a message board ... I would assume there's a reason the Glazers made the investment in him that they did.I was under the impression Bruce Allen was trying to build a running team, which is why he passed on quarterbacks like Aaron Rodgers, Jason Campbell, Brady Quinn, and Trent Edwards to draft running backs and linemen. Apparently him and Gruden aren't on the same page.