Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Did you watch the games or just read the stat lines?
A second or third round pick, maybe. But a first rounder based on his PSU performance (no one was calling for this kid in the first before that to my knowledge..) is ridiculous
when next years draft will be full of legitimate starters like Tebow, Bradford and McCoy.
Quote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:47:00 AMDid you watch the games or just read the stat lines?LOL...So that's where you go after those stats disprove your "inconsistent" theory?LOL...I guess I should ask you the same question since you call Sanchez inconsistent, which clearly isn't the case.Quote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:47:00 AMA second or third round pick, maybe. But a first rounder based on his PSU performance (no one was calling for this kid in the first before that to my knowledge..) is ridiculous It's a shame that wasn't your argument in the first place. �You said he was inconsistent. �Sanchez only had one bad game by my count, against ASU...where his team won 28-0.
I've been seeing some fans entertaining the idea of the Bucs drafting USC quaterback Mark Sanchez. So I ask, why. Why draft a one year wonder who was also a one year starter, when next years draft will be full of legitimate starters like Tebow, Bradford and McCoy. Espescially when the negative people that think were going to do so horrible(like challenging the 0-16 Lions) next season than that means we would have a high first rounder and a better shot in drafting one of those guys. I wouldn't take him in any round, we don't need another guy that has had run ins with the law, with one being sexual assault which he was accused of, with no charges of course! He was released on a 200,000 dollar bond. Draft a quarterback next year if Harrell isn't available in the 2nd or 3rd Round. That's what I'd do.RAHEEM09'Change we can believe in!TBbuccaneer40 out.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on January 22, 2009, 11:37:23 AMQuote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:22:46 AMQuote from: Biggs3535 on January 22, 2009, 11:19:06 AMQuote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:16:48 AMHe wasn't even a one YEAR wonder, he was a one GAME wonder.Can anyone point to a game other than PSU where Sanchez looked above average?Anyone?He looked pretty good against OSU.Against another slow Big 10 defense.He looks average other than a few big performances, seems pretty inconsistent for a first round pick, maybe if he'd stay another year I could see it.Sanchez had his best games against the best teams they played.� He had big games against ranked teams in OSU, Oregon, Cal, and Penn State.I don't know what you need to see as far as consistency.� He threw for 3207 yards, 34 TD's, and 10 Ints with a 65.8 completion percentage in 12 games.� That ain't too shabby.Did you watch the games or just read the stat lines?He's VERY inconsistent and drafting him in the first round because he bested a few under matched opponents in college doesn't fill me with excitement. He's not gonna be playing any slow, clunky Big Ten defense in the NFC South lol.A second or third round pick, maybe. But a first rounder based on his PSU performance (no one was calling for this kid in the first before that to my knowledge..) is ridiculous.Sanchez is inconsistent, not as good as the previous 3 USC QBs at this point in time and even his coach eluded to him coming out being a mistake. The clue train is a blaring, please let it into the station.
Quote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:22:46 AMQuote from: Biggs3535 on January 22, 2009, 11:19:06 AMQuote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:16:48 AMHe wasn't even a one YEAR wonder, he was a one GAME wonder.Can anyone point to a game other than PSU where Sanchez looked above average?Anyone?He looked pretty good against OSU.Against another slow Big 10 defense.He looks average other than a few big performances, seems pretty inconsistent for a first round pick, maybe if he'd stay another year I could see it.Sanchez had his best games against the best teams they played.� He had big games against ranked teams in OSU, Oregon, Cal, and Penn State.I don't know what you need to see as far as consistency.� He threw for 3207 yards, 34 TD's, and 10 Ints with a 65.8 completion percentage in 12 games.� That ain't too shabby.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on January 22, 2009, 11:19:06 AMQuote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:16:48 AMHe wasn't even a one YEAR wonder, he was a one GAME wonder.Can anyone point to a game other than PSU where Sanchez looked above average?Anyone?He looked pretty good against OSU.Against another slow Big 10 defense.He looks average other than a few big performances, seems pretty inconsistent for a first round pick, maybe if he'd stay another year I could see it.
Quote from: Magnaccia on January 22, 2009, 11:16:48 AMHe wasn't even a one YEAR wonder, he was a one GAME wonder.Can anyone point to a game other than PSU where Sanchez looked above average?Anyone?He looked pretty good against OSU.
He wasn't even a one YEAR wonder, he was a one GAME wonder.Can anyone point to a game other than PSU where Sanchez looked above average?Anyone?
Matt Cassel hadn't thrown a pass since Pop warner or something like that, and he did okay.
He is inconsistent,
again, did you watch these games sans the Rose Bowl before coming to your opinion?
He shows flashes of greatness then you've got games where his completion percentage is around 50% against pass defenses that aren't exactly top 10.
I read somewhere that Sanchez has completed all his classes for graduation. So pretty much if he returned to school next year the only thing he would be doing is playing football. Why not enter the draft get acclimated with your new job and get paid while doing it? He should be spending his rookie year learning from the bench. Sanchez is a better pro prospect than Booty or Leinart.