Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
oh and ward has proven so much?
It's a Catch-22 on the Ward argument. If he had 500 more carries, then we could say ''He's already got too much wear and he's almost 29.''Running backs don't wear down at a particular age. It depends on workload. He's got 1.5 really good years under his belt and is clearly in his prime.There's nothing he does poorly: he's an above average blocker, above average receiver, has speed, is a bull and for the most part holds onto the ball.Bush is younger, but remember that we're not talking about an even exchange here. He's not a FA. We have to trade picks for him.There's nothing convincing that Bush is even, let alone superior.
1. You're hung up on the chronological age. It's irrelevant because he isn't worn down like most 28, soon-to-be 29 year-olds. That's a GOOD thing.2. Nobody knows what he can or can't do? That's totally false. The only thing unproven is how Ward would handle a consistent 30-carry per game workload, which we would never want to do anyway. Over the last two seasons, he has had one 200-yard plus game, two other 100-yard plus games and five other of over 80 yards. THAT is hardly unproven. In terms of carries, he's only twice gone over 20, which again is a GOOD thing. 3. The price is irrational? We have over $60M left under the cap and you want to trade a draft pick for a guy who is far less proven, both statistically and in big games? THAT is irrational.