|
|
|
|

Guest
|
 |
« #32 : March 06, 2009, 11:01:35 AM »
|
|
The saints would undo that trade in a second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Guest
|
 |
« #43 : March 06, 2009, 09:09:38 PM »
|
|
So aside from the microfracture concerns (which are real considering the nature of the game, the weakness of joints), was giving up a 2nd too much for K2?
I think you just answered your own question. What player has had prolonged success following micro-fracture surgery? That is the source of my concern. And for the record, I love the guy.
|
|
|
|
|

Guest
|
 |
« #44 : March 06, 2009, 09:22:25 PM »
|
|
At this point, it still appears we wasted a pick on Michael Clayton, yet we gave this clown a contract with money he hasn't earned. You can't tell me Clayton is in the same league as K2.
Michael Clayton will be fine now that Gruden is gone. Injuries and Gruden's doghouse hampered his production since his rookie year. The new regime knows his worth and paid him accordingly. Clayton is one of the very best blocking WRs in the league, and he will return to form in receptions without the prejudice of Jon Gruden. Don't expect 1200 yards from him. He is not the only viable receiver like he was in his rookie year. He will contribute whether the play called is a run or a pass, and he will earn his money and your respect. This team already has a lot of options in the passing game, and defenses won't know where they are vulnerable. The ball will be spread around, and while I'm at it, McCown will prove to be an upgrade over Garcia. He also was a victim of Gruden's doghouse.
Well said.
Utter insanity. His lack of performance had nothing to do with Gruden, except in regard to the craptastic QBs Jon kept fielding.
|
|
|
|
|