Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
And I agree with this post 1000 percent.Yeah. And I am the one saying Grads played lights out....gimme a break.You actually think he was the reason for the Bucs win?He managed 14 points on the Bengals. Not a good defense at all.The DEFENSE made a difference today. Mostly the run defense. YOUR lack of udnerstanding who to compliment in this game is stunning. Talk about ignorance all you want, but you sound like a Grads nut jockey right about now.
Grads was extremely lucky that Cincy's secondary sucked. There were several balls that they definately should have caught. If our guys had missed what they did, we would be screaming!
Yeah. And I am the one saying Grads played lights out....gimme a break.
Nice straw man. Nobody here is saying he did play lights out.
You sure are attacking me like I am saying otherwise. Calling me ignorant must be a kind word in your household.
I'm not attacking you, I'm not setting up straw man arguments or red herrings as you have. I doubt you're ignorant, but it is clear that you are ignorant of many aspects of the game.
Cincinatti has one of the most opportunistic secondaries in the NFL. They led the league in interceptions last year and if I'm not mistaken, we're leading the league coming into this game.
Well, not today!
Go ahead, name one thing I said that was ignoratn on any aspect.
You show your ignorance of the game when you fail to recognize the fact that the poor play of the QB during the first three games of this season had a negative impact on the offensive line, the running game, the playcalling, and the defense. Clearly anyone who has played this game before understands that. Therefore, if you don't understand it or demonstrate that you DO understand it, then you're either ignorant of the game, or you're putting on the air of ignorance.And you should try to understand that ignorance of subject matter doesn't make a person ignorant. I didn't call you ignorant, despite the fact that you've launched a personal attack on me. called me an idiot, and consistently made allusions to sexual orientation as if that has any bearing on the discussion at hand. It only makes you look small minded and petty. So if that's what you're going for, then you've done well. If not, then I suggest you take the sexually-related insults to a forum that caters to middle schoolers, who might consider that sort of thing "intelligent argument".
I agree he is as raw as they come.But for a guy who was heralded on accuracy, and known to not have a deep ball, didn't he look it today? Â The negative may be true, is all I am saying.The defense finally carried the Bucs today. Â And Caddy wasn't that bad on the ground.Glad the Bucs won is all I am saying, but I wasn't blown away by Grads performance.