Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Not a bad mock draft TRJ997.1. While I like Chris Johnson has a first round pick this year, I prefer to get someone we will get a bigger workload in Rd 1. Nothing wrong with Johnson except for he splits carries and loses goalline carries to White. Not a bad pick.2. I love Calvin in the second, but Colston and Bowe in the 3rd and 4th are about a round too early for each. Try to target them in the 4th and 5th if you can.3. Aside from those, you have no depth at WR. Sure you can trade a RB or two, but I like to know that I have depth in case anything happens (ex: Like Colston getting hurt last year.)4. You got a steal with Ward in RD 8, great pick.5. Good job handcuffing Parker with Mendenhall. I am not big on Parker this year but he is good value in the 5th RD.6. Nice pick in Rice in the late rounds. I think he will have a pretty good year.Hope this helps.WH
it's April
You have too many RBs splitting time.
Quote from: JC510 on April 03, 2009, 12:16:36 PMYou have too many RBs splitting time. Welcome to 2009.
Quote from: TRJ997 on April 04, 2009, 08:57:29 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 03, 2009, 12:16:36 PMYou have too many RBs splitting time. Welcome to 2009.There are still backs who get the yards and the goal line work but you created reasons to pass on them.
If you draft Chris Johnson, you need LenDale White. It hurts to watch Chris Johnson take it to inside the 5, then White pounds it in for 6 points.
Quote from: JC510 on April 06, 2009, 12:12:55 PMQuote from: TRJ997 on April 04, 2009, 08:57:29 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 03, 2009, 12:16:36 PMYou have too many RBs splitting time. Welcome to 2009.There are still backs who get the yards and the goal line work but you created reasons to pass on them.I'm not going to argue the merits of Chris Johnson in the 1st too much as he was a top 10 back in my league despite being in a committee last year. LenDale probably won't score 15 TDs again, and Chris Johnson has the talent to continue his explosion into the league. I'm also not going to draft 2 RB's in the 1st 2 rounds, which doesn't leave me with very many non committee options. Which players should I have taken instead of Colston or Bowe? The only non-committee guy I'd consider is Kevin Smith in the 4th (over Bowe). Look at the mock. Every single RB taken after Kevin Smith is in a committee except Cedric Benson (who looks like a great value pick). All of the sure fire guys who don't give up some goal line carries are gone by the mid second and the best are gone by pick 5. The rest of the bunch looks mostly the same. I will be loading up as heavily as possible on the stud WRs, who are less likely to get injured and more likely to live up to their lofty draft status.Every single year there are multiple RB's who pop up in the 2nd half of the season and provide good starters for a few games. By getting 3 stud WRs, I don't have to use many roster spots (1 or 2 max) on backup WRs who will never start. This gives me more flexibility to snatch up as many RBs as possible. Assuming I only have to start 2 RBs, I guarantee I will be able to find the equivalent of a very strong RB2 from this bunch:Willie Parker, Derrick Ward, Ernest Graham, Darren Sproles, Ahmad Bradshaw, Rashard Mendenhall, Dominik Rhodes, and the numerous waiver wire guys I will pick up along the way.
Quote from: TRJ997 on April 06, 2009, 06:34:40 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 06, 2009, 12:12:55 PMQuote from: TRJ997 on April 04, 2009, 08:57:29 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 03, 2009, 12:16:36 PMYou have too many RBs splitting time. Welcome to 2009.There are still backs who get the yards and the goal line work but you created reasons to pass on them.I'm not going to argue the merits of Chris Johnson in the 1st too much as he was a top 10 back in my league despite being in a committee last year. LenDale probably won't score 15 TDs again, and Chris Johnson has the talent to continue his explosion into the league. I'm also not going to draft 2 RB's in the 1st 2 rounds, which doesn't leave me with very many non committee options. Which players should I have taken instead of Colston or Bowe? The only non-committee guy I'd consider is Kevin Smith in the 4th (over Bowe). Look at the mock. Every single RB taken after Kevin Smith is in a committee except Cedric Benson (who looks like a great value pick). All of the sure fire guys who don't give up some goal line carries are gone by the mid second and the best are gone by pick 5. The rest of the bunch looks mostly the same. I will be loading up as heavily as possible on the stud WRs, who are less likely to get injured and more likely to live up to their lofty draft status.Every single year there are multiple RB's who pop up in the 2nd half of the season and provide good starters for a few games. By getting 3 stud WRs, I don't have to use many roster spots (1 or 2 max) on backup WRs who will never start. This gives me more flexibility to snatch up as many RBs as possible. Assuming I only have to start 2 RBs, I guarantee I will be able to find the equivalent of a very strong RB2 from this bunch:Willie Parker, Derrick Ward, Ernest Graham, Darren Sproles, Ahmad Bradshaw, Rashard Mendenhall, Dominik Rhodes, and the numerous waiver wire guys I will pick up along the way.I think you're creating your own problems.� Few examples...1. You say Slaton isn't worth the #7 pick?He had 1659 yards, 10 TDs. Johnson had 1448 yards, 10 TDs. I like Johnson, but White is going to get the ball inside the 10. That really limits Johnson's potential. Unless White gets hurt Johnson might struggle to reach that fantasy value again. He probably maxed out last year. Slaton on the other hand could easily increase his TD output, significantly. 2. You eliminate D. Williams because he's in a timeshare but so is Johnson. 3. Why can't you take 2 RBs in the first 2 rounds? You can get good WRs in the 3rd and 4th while making sure you get 2 stud RBs early. Picking at 7 I think yiu HAVE TO go RB, RB. 4. Portis is neither old nor injury prone.5. Westbrook has only missed 4 games the last 3 years.You need RBs who get yards and TDs. Instead you have a bunch of guys who get yards OR touchdowns.
Quote from: TRJ997 on April 06, 2009, 06:34:40 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 06, 2009, 12:12:55 PMQuote from: TRJ997 on April 04, 2009, 08:57:29 PMQuote from: JC510 on April 03, 2009, 12:16:36 PMYou have too many RBs splitting time. Welcome to 2009.There are still backs who get the yards and the goal line work but you created reasons to pass on them.I'm not going to argue the merits of Chris Johnson in the 1st too much as he was a top 10 back in my league despite being in a committee last year. LenDale probably won't score 15 TDs again, and Chris Johnson has the talent to continue his explosion into the league. I'm also not going to draft 2 RB's in the 1st 2 rounds, which doesn't leave me with very many non committee options. Which players should I have taken instead of Colston or Bowe? The only non-committee guy I'd consider is Kevin Smith in the 4th (over Bowe). Look at the mock. Every single RB taken after Kevin Smith is in a committee except Cedric Benson (who looks like a great value pick). All of the sure fire guys who don't give up some goal line carries are gone by the mid second and the best are gone by pick 5. The rest of the bunch looks mostly the same. I will be loading up as heavily as possible on the stud WRs, who are less likely to get injured and more likely to live up to their lofty draft status.Every single year there are multiple RB's who pop up in the 2nd half of the season and provide good starters for a few games. By getting 3 stud WRs, I don't have to use many roster spots (1 or 2 max) on backup WRs who will never start. This gives me more flexibility to snatch up as many RBs as possible. Assuming I only have to start 2 RBs, I guarantee I will be able to find the equivalent of a very strong RB2 from this bunch:Willie Parker, Derrick Ward, Ernest Graham, Darren Sproles, Ahmad Bradshaw, Rashard Mendenhall, Dominik Rhodes, and the numerous waiver wire guys I will pick up along the way.I think you're creating your own problems.� Few examples...1. You say Slaton isn't worth the #7 pick?He had 1659 yards, 10 TDs. Johnson had 1448 yards, 10 TDs. I like Johnson, but White is going to get the ball inside the 10. That really limits Johnson's potential. Unless White gets hurt Johnson might struggle to reach that fantasy value again. He probably maxed out last year. Slaton on the other hand could easily increase his TD output, significantly. 2. You eliminate D. Williams because he's in a timeshare but so is Johnson. 3. Why can't you take 2 RBs in the first 2 rounds? You can get good WRs in the 3rd and 4th while making sure you get 2 stud RBs early. Picking at 7 I think yiu HAVE TO go RB, RB. 4. Portis is neither old nor injury prone.5. Westbrook has only missed 4 games the last 4 years and I think some of those were because the game didn't mean anything.You need RBs who get yards and TDs. Instead you have a bunch of guys who get yards OR touchdowns.