Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
This actually looks like a good schedule for a new regime. The first half is brutal, but they'd be taking their lumps early no matter who they played. Then the second half lightens up and they can finish the season on a high note with excitement about 2010.
Who cares about no primetime games? When have we ever gotten that many?
Quote from: watson on April 14, 2009, 07:05:09 PMPer NFL Network Tampa plays Dallas in week one. �Not a good way to start. �At least TO won't prancing along the sidelines .Please. Dallas is nothing special. And we finally open in our house. The energy is going to be electric.. I think we pull out a W.
Per NFL Network Tampa plays Dallas in week one. �Not a good way to start. �At least TO won't prancing along the sidelines .
Hate, the league just wants to hand the Cowboys an easy opening day victory. It's like what happened when Joe Montana started his first game for the Chiefs.
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on April 14, 2009, 08:48:20 PMHate, the league just wants to hand the Cowboys an easy opening day victory. It's like what happened when Joe Montana started his first game for the Chiefs.I think if that was truly the case, they'd have the Boyz opening at home in their billion dollar palace.
I think if that was truly the case, they'd have the Boyz opening at home in their billion dollar palace.
Look at the Cowboys schedule. They don't play any teams at home as weak as the Bucs other than the Raiders. They do play the Raiders at home. But they needed the Raiders as the sacrificial lambs for Thanksgiving this year.
Surely you aren't implying that the NFL chose the Boyz' opponents?