Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Dominik said, "It didn't work out for the team and it didn't work out for the player", so I am guessing it was a player that is no longer with the team.
It sounds like the 2002 draft he is talking about. That would go a long way toward explaining the rift between McKay and Gruden. Interesting comment that McKay was  'very compartmentalized in his approach', so in other words he wasn't taking input from anyone.
Ah 2002. The infamous Marquis Walker over Brian Westbrook draft. Could be.
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
McKay was 'very compartmentalized in his approach', so in other words he wasn't taking input from anyone.
Quote from: BucsPirate on April 20, 2009, 01:43:56 PMMcKay was 'very compartmentalized in his approach', so in other words he wasn't taking input from anyone. And that's the way it was with RM. After he wrested control of the draft from Sam, he vowed never again to let the coaching staff have influence over the draft selections. He called Sam's Sapp/Brooks draft in 1995 "a circus". Fortunately for Tampa Bay, it was Sam's "circus" (and Rusty Tillman's insistence that they trade back up and draft Brooks) that was responsible for two of the best performing Buccaneers in team history.
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on April 20, 2009, 02:26:48 PMQuote from: BucsPirate on April 20, 2009, 01:43:56 PMMcKay was 'very compartmentalized in his approach', so in other words he wasn't taking input from anyone. And that's the way it was with RM. After he wrested control of the draft from Sam, he vowed never again to let the coaching staff have influence over the draft selections. He called Sam's Sapp/Brooks draft in 1995 "a circus". Fortunately for Tampa Bay, it was Sam's "circus" (and Rusty Tillman's insistence that they trade back up and draft Brooks) that was responsible for two of the best performing Buccaneers in team history.Though wasn't Allen done in by the opposite - allowing everyone to have a say so no one ended up with true accountability?