Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
OK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"Mike Vick killed some dogs and gets 2 years..... Stallworth gets liquored up and kills a family man coming home from work and he gets 30 days???WOW, just, WOW!http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4262751
OK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"
Michael Vick had an organized criminal enterprise. Stallworth had a stupid lapse of judgment. �End result may seem to indicate Stallworth's was worse, but in the end, they may have had a problem actually convicting him of DUI manslaughter and couldn't have proved that the accident never would have occurred in he had not been drinking. �I am not trying to condemn the victim here, but people are too often quick to absolve pedestrians of any wrong-doing.
Quote from: docbravo on June 16, 2009, 12:32:12 PMOK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"You're right, you don't get it.Vick wasn't imprisoned for killing dogs.
Quote from: doclobster on June 16, 2009, 12:36:37 PMMichael Vick had an organized criminal enterprise. Stallworth had a stupid lapse of judgment. �End result may seem to indicate Stallworth's was worse, but in the end, they may have had a problem actually convicting him of DUI manslaughter and couldn't have proved that the accident never would have occurred in he had not been drinking. �I am not trying to condemn the victim here, but people are too often quick to absolve pedestrians of any wrong-doing. Organized Criminal Enterprise? Is that what we are calling a gambling ring? Cancel Poker night boys, wouldn't wanna get busted for running an "Organized Criminal Enterprise!" The pedestrian's wrong doing consisted of Jay-Walking (Punishable by Death apparently.....). Stallworth made a conscious decision to get being the wheel of his Bentley and drive under the influence. IMO, Stallworth is a great risk to society than Vick.  30 days is a slap on the wrist for him, and a Slap in the face to the victims family.
Quote from: docbravo on June 16, 2009, 12:45:30 PMQuote from: doclobster on June 16, 2009, 12:36:37 PMMichael Vick had an organized criminal enterprise. Stallworth had a stupid lapse of judgment. �End result may seem to indicate Stallworth's was worse, but in the end, they may have had a problem actually convicting him of DUI manslaughter and couldn't have proved that the accident never would have occurred in he had not been drinking. �I am not trying to condemn the victim here, but people are too often quick to absolve pedestrians of any wrong-doing. Organized Criminal Enterprise? Is that what we are calling a gambling ring? Cancel Poker night boys, wouldn't wanna get busted for running an "Organized Criminal Enterprise!" The pedestrian's wrong doing consisted of Jay-Walking (Punishable by Death apparently.....). Stallworth made a conscious decision to get being the wheel of his Bentley and drive under the influence. IMO, Stallworth is a great risk to society than Vick. �30 days is a slap on the wrist for him, and a Slap in the face to the victims family.Wow, how are you not in the law profession? You are doing this country a disservice, sir. Additionally, the plea deal probably would not have gone through if the victim's family had not been OK with the huge windfall settlement they received.
Quote from: doclobster on June 16, 2009, 12:36:37 PMMichael Vick had an organized criminal enterprise. Stallworth had a stupid lapse of judgment. �End result may seem to indicate Stallworth's was worse, but in the end, they may have had a problem actually convicting him of DUI manslaughter and couldn't have proved that the accident never would have occurred in he had not been drinking. �I am not trying to condemn the victim here, but people are too often quick to absolve pedestrians of any wrong-doing. Organized Criminal Enterprise? Is that what we are calling a gambling ring? Cancel Poker night boys, wouldn't wanna get busted for running an "Organized Criminal Enterprise!" The pedestrian's wrong doing consisted of Jay-Walking (Punishable by Death apparently.....). Stallworth made a conscious decision to get being the wheel of his Bentley and drive under the influence. IMO, Stallworth is a great risk to society than Vick. �30 days is a slap on the wrist for him, and a Slap in the face to the victims family.
Michael Vick had an organized criminal enterprise. Stallworth had a stupid lapse of judgment. �End result may seem to indicate Stallworth's was worse, but in the end, they may have had a problem actually convicting him of DUI manslaughter and couldn't have proved that the accident never would have occurred in he had not been drinking. �I am not trying to condemn the victim here, but people are too often quick to absolve pedestrians of any wrong-doing.
You're right, you don't get it.Vick wasn't imprisoned for killing dogs.
Quote from: docbravo on June 16, 2009, 12:32:12 PMOK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"Mike Vick killed some dogs and gets 2 years..... Stallworth gets liquored up and kills a family man coming home from work and he gets 30 days???WOW, just, WOW!http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4262751Leonard Little the same.I agree with you.  It is indeed a shame, and PETA should go and protest THESE dudes before Michael Vick.  PETA makes me sick...Radical fools.
Stallworth blew a .126. �The legal limit is .08. �They say that a beer will raise your alcohol content .02. �So he basically had 2 beers over the legal limit and you want the guy to go away for a long time?30 days seems short, I will agree, but the supposed 15 years would have been a bit extreme. �It was dumb on Stallworths part to be drinking and driving, but he was 2 beers over the legal limit. �Couple that with the fact that he�s giving the family 2-5 million and I�m sure they are ok with him being out in 30 days. �Plus, that jogger shouldn�t have been jay walking. �You could hit people jay walking when you�re sober�.would you go to jail for that? �So this guy essentially was illegal for 2 beers and we want to put him away for 15 years?Yes. 30 days is a bit short, should have been more, maybe 1 year�but I guess considering hes giving the family 2-5 million, they shortened his sentence.
Quote from: Boid Fink on June 16, 2009, 12:35:32 PMQuote from: docbravo on June 16, 2009, 12:32:12 PMOK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"Mike Vick killed some dogs and gets 2 years..... Stallworth gets liquored up and kills a family man coming home from work and he gets 30 days???WOW, just, WOW!http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4262751Leonard Little the same.I agree with you. Â It is indeed a shame, and PETA should go and protest THESE dudes before Michael Vick. Â PETA makes me sick...Radical fools.Sorry but there's a big difference in my mind between INTENTIONALLY breeding and training dogs to kill one another while getting a thrill out of it for amusement and having an illegal gambling ring AND being at the wrong place at the wrong time with a few beers still left in your system when some crazy fool decides to take a stroll in the middle of a freeway.
Quote from: docbravo on June 16, 2009, 12:32:12 PMOK, put me in the category that "JUST DOESN'T GET IT!"Mike Vick killed some dogs and gets 2 years..... Stallworth gets liquored up and kills a family man coming home from work and he gets 30 days???WOW, just, WOW!http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4262751Leonard Little the same.I agree with you. Â It is indeed a shame, and PETA should go and protest THESE dudes before Michael Vick. Â PETA makes me sick...Radical fools.
Stallworth made a mistake in judgment ONE NIGHT.Vick made mistakes in judgment for SIX YEARS.There's your difference.