Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Ward was a backup, and that was the reason he had a good ypc average and a good ammount of yards.
Quote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:03:18 AMWard was a backup, and that was the reason he had a good ypc average and a good ammount of yards.Put him on the 06 bucs as a starter, and do you think he does the same? You would be out of your mind to think that.Which is all the more reason to find merit in his work...the guy was a backup and played extremely well...
Ward was a backup, and that was the reason he had a good ypc average and a good ammount of yards.Put him on the 06 bucs as a starter, and do you think he does the same? You would be out of your mind to think that.
I still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.
Quote from: Boid Fink on August 17, 2009, 10:04:45 AMQuote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:03:18 AMWard was a backup, and that was the reason he had a good ypc average and a good ammount of yards.Put him on the 06 bucs as a starter, and do you think he does the same? You would be out of your mind to think that.Which is all the more reason to find merit in his work...the guy was a backup and played extremely well...No, he did well because he played as a backup to the largest running back in nfl history, who wore the hell out of defenses, and made it easy for ward to come in and get some yards. Also, the giants had the best run blocking o-line in the league. Don't forget that the backups are usually the ones who get the draw plays on 3rd and longs, which greatly increase the ypc average. I still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.Any running back is going to do well in the position that ward was in last year. I expect for bradshaw to do the same.
Quote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:10:21 AMI still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.Do you also remember that was with 70 carries, as opposed to the 182 carries Ward had last season?
Quote from: Biggs3535 on August 17, 2009, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:10:21 AMI still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.Do you also remember that was with 70 carries, as opposed to the 182 carries Ward had last season?lol that isn't even that much of a difference. I could see pittman easily getting that many carry's and still having a great ypc average. Especially behind the best o-line in the league, and a 6'5 260 pound monster.
Quote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:16:16 AMQuote from: Biggs3535 on August 17, 2009, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:10:21 AMI still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.Do you also remember that was with 70 carries, as opposed to the 182 carries Ward had last season?lol that isn't even that much of a difference. I could see pittman easily getting that many carry's and still having a great ypc average. Especially behind the best o-line in the league, and a 6'5 260 pound monster.That's over 110 carries and 589 yards, that's quite a bit of a difference.
Dude, you're not even close on this one. The more carries a RB gets, the harder it is for him to keep his YPC high.2008 Derrick Ward (1025 yards in 182 carries for a 5.6 YPC) >>>>> 2005 Michael Pittman (436 yards in 70 carries for a 6.1 YPC)
Quote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:10:21 AMQuote from: Boid Fink on August 17, 2009, 10:04:45 AMQuote from: barberandbrooks on August 17, 2009, 10:03:18 AMWard was a backup, and that was the reason he had a good ypc average and a good ammount of yards.Put him on the 06 bucs as a starter, and do you think he does the same? You would be out of your mind to think that.Which is all the more reason to find merit in his work...the guy was a backup and played extremely well...No, he did well because he played as a backup to the largest running back in nfl history, who wore the hell out of defenses, and made it easy for ward to come in and get some yards. Also, the giants had the best run blocking o-line in the league. Don't forget that the backups are usually the ones who get the draw plays on 3rd and longs, which greatly increase the ypc average. I still remember when pittman had a 6.2 ypc average one year while behind caddy.Any running back is going to do well in the position that ward was in last year. I expect for bradshaw to do the same.Mike Alstott.
...even as a decoy!
Quote from: Ladyfan on August 17, 2009, 01:55:16 PM...even as a decoy! He's NOT a full-time guy, but I'd try to sneek him the ball at least 5 times a game.
Quote from: benchwarmer69 on August 17, 2009, 04:15:19 PMQuote from: Ladyfan on August 17, 2009, 01:55:16 PM...even as a decoy! He's NOT a full-time guy, but I'd try to sneek him the ball at least 5 times a game.WTH is that signature pic?! LOL!
Quote from: buccaneerbruce76 on August 17, 2009, 08:31:42 AMDid u seriously say that...? Ward is a slightly faster Graham period. Smith is more illusive and faster than both of them, he will get his touches on offense. You put Smith out in the open field and he is more dangerous than anybody currently in our backfield.This "open field" mythos is typical of people who think that special teams means something on the real field. Different skill set and there's a reason that Allen Rossum, Dante Hall and even Devin Hester aren't electric as real players. Ward has 41 cathes and a spiffy, for an RB, 9.4 ypc average. Don't tell me about Smith looking good against backups and scrubs. Ward has been productive as a receiver against the men who play in this league.
Did u seriously say that...? Ward is a slightly faster Graham period. Smith is more illusive and faster than both of them, he will get his touches on offense. You put Smith out in the open field and he is more dangerous than anybody currently in our backfield.