Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Maybe you misunderstood. At the time I thought Leinert was the best QB in the draft but not the concensus #1 overall.
Gotcha. He's certainly making a case for it now though. I thought the Titans were crazy for taking Young over him and the Raiders were worse than that for passing on him.
Being in AZ cerainly will help him with the weapons he has around him. The line could be better but having Edge, Bolden, and Fitz certainly makes it a lot easier. His strength is in reading defense and getting rid of the ball, so that certainly plays to the cards only weakness on Offense which is the OL. I still think when all is said and done Young will be better but Leinart certainly fell into a better situation. Young has done a lot better I think than people figured as he was supposed to have a very long learning curve. His numbers aren't great but he has looked better as he gains experience and he really has nothing around him to speak of as far as weapons on offense go. Like every young QB he has his moments where he looks very good and others where he looks lost.
bradentonian--You're in good company. Â I picked Leinart to be the draft's biggest bust. Â Guess I blew that one...lol.Reggie bush is already showing signs of greatness. Â The guy is phenomally talented and is blessed to be playing for a head coach that is bringing him along correctly. Â Reggie Bush will rival LT, easily.With all this talk of Bush and Leinart, what about Vince Young? Â Who can deny that the Titans are a totally different team with that kid at the helm. Â
With all this talk of Bush and Leinart, what about Vince Young? Â Who can deny that the Titans are a totally different team with that kid at the helm. Â
Bush gets a lot less carries than LT. Physically, he's every bit as talented. Just wait till he has a season or 2 under his belt, and his coach lets him out of the gate for real.Â
Bush gets a lot less carries than LT. Physically, he's every bit as talented. Just wait till he has a season or 2 under his belt, and his coach lets him out of the gate for real.
I think Bush compares more favorably to Westbrook than LT. At this point he isn't nearly as good, IMO, but that should change when he gets used to the speed of the defenders at the pro level.
I think Westbrook is probably a fair comparison. A good but not great RB who struggles staying on the field due to various injuries. They are about the same weight as wlel, with Bush being a little taller.
Does that mean you think Bush will struggle with injuries?
That depends. Westbrook in his first couple years didn't have any injuries because he didn't touch the ball a lot. His last 2 years he averaged about 20 touches a game and has missed 5 games. Bush is getting it at about that rate now. I think he might be ok at that rate, but if he gets around the 25+ mark he will struggle with injuries. People are saying wait until he gets the ball more and he'll produce. I disagree. I think if he gets the ball much more he'll breakdown as he isn't built to handle the ball a whole lot. However, I think what NO does helps him, as he gets a lot of touches in the passing game where he is less likely to take big hits.I think Ideally for Bush he carries the ball 10-15 times a game and catches 5-8 passes a game. Throw him back for a PR every now and then. That is about what he gets now which I think is perfect for him in order to max out his production and stay healthy.
He's bigger than Warrick DunnFair enough, but Warrick Dunn isn't as big and he's been able to stay upright. Barry Sanders wasn't a big back, Walter Payton barely broke 200 lbs and he was pretty durable behind a bad OL for a lot of his career. I'm not saying Bush is going to be Payton or Sanders or even Dunn, but to assume he'd get hurt just by virtue of his size is something of a reach...