Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: The White Tiger on October 07, 2009, 05:55:02 PMFreeman was not surrounded by talent and HIS teams were outclassed each time he played a conference power.So Freeman didn't have the 2nd leading receiver in the nation that last year he beat Texas?
Freeman was not surrounded by talent and HIS teams were outclassed each time he played a conference power.
Now if you're referring to the 2007 game in which Jordy Nelson's 12 receptions for 112 yards & 1 TD as well as returning a punt for a TD.http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=272720251That's 14 points, K-State beat #7 ranked Texas 41-21.K-State scored another 28 points without Jordy Nelson.Sorry - you can't make the case against Freeman by saying he was surrounded by talent. He was the talent.
Terrence Cody of Bama 6'4" 365lbs Now that's a space eater. Probably eats other stuff too.
I don't know how accurate this is, but NFL.com lists Gardener as 295 lbs. That's about what Suh and McCoy are listed. I agree with you only Suh appears to be of such a superior talent he can work in any scheme, kind of like Kevin Williams. McCoy might be a little more pigeon-holed. It will just come down to BPA. If Suh is a Kevin Williams type he'll be more valuable than a DE who may not be the next John Abraham.
There was a reason Freeman was considered by more than the Bucs as a legitimate NFL starting QB with tremendous upside.
Quote from: John Galt? on October 08, 2009, 11:19:16 AMQuote from: The White Tiger on October 07, 2009, 11:02:24 PMThere was a reason Freeman was considered by more than the Bucs as a legitimate NFL starting QB with tremendous upside.Yes, mostly physical measurable reasons. Like his height, arm strength, 40 times, agility, etc. A 6'6" beast that can throw a ball 50+ yards while rolling outIs it just me or does that sound eeringly similar to JaMarcus Russell?  :-
Quote from: The White Tiger on October 07, 2009, 11:02:24 PMThere was a reason Freeman was considered by more than the Bucs as a legitimate NFL starting QB with tremendous upside.Yes, mostly physical measurable reasons. Like his height, arm strength, 40 times, agility, etc. A 6'6" beast that can throw a ball 50+ yards while rolling out
Quote from: The White Tiger on October 07, 2009, 11:02:24 PMThere was a reason Freeman was considered by more than the Bucs as a legitimate NFL starting QB with tremendous upside.Yes, mostly physical measurable reasons. Like his height, arm strength, 40 times, agility, etc. A 6'6" beast that can throw a ball 50+ yards while rolling out/quote]Is it just me or does that sound eeringly similar to JaMarcus Russell? :-
Quote from: BucsBullsBolts on October 08, 2009, 11:34:03 AMQuote from: John Galt? on October 08, 2009, 11:19:16 AMQuote from: The White Tiger on October 07, 2009, 11:02:24 PMThere was a reason Freeman was considered by more than the Bucs as a legitimate NFL starting QB with tremendous upside.Yes, mostly physical measurable reasons. Like his height, arm strength, 40 times, agility, etc. A 6'6" beast that can throw a ball 50+ yards while rolling outIs it just me or does that sound eeringly similar to JaMarcus Russell?  :-One difference, and it could be a big one, is JaM Russell only played 2 seasons in college. I think JF came out too early (development wise) and JaM came out WAAAAY too early.
Perhaps you're referring to Josh Freeman's true freshman season