Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Chev - UW plays ARK in the Who Gives a Damn Bowl on January 1.
Quote from: Cerious on December 06, 2006, 10:56:49 AMQuote from: Cheveliar on December 06, 2006, 10:46:51 AMStatistically, you are right. However, to me the priority has to be the defense. I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. I don't care how we do it to be honest. I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. I depend on you draft gurus for that. If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMOAgain Chev, no knock on you boys, but you just can't pass on a Franchise LT, especially if you don't one on your roster. With the injury to Beunning and no specific timetable as to when he'll be back in TOP shape (knee injuries take time even after the player has done the rehab, part ofthe recovery is mental), I'd like to see Davis moved inside. I think Davis is better suited to block inside a phonebooth on a consistent basis. We already know about his agility, so I think he could pull without problem, but I would like to see him add a few pounds back to his frame and get back to dominating in the run blocking dept. Lne him up next to a Franchise LT and the left side gets back to business again.Maybe you didn't read my post well. I'm not opposed to picking the "franchise" player. I'm opposed to the mindset that he is the most urgent need. I totally disagree with that thought process. Like I stated, we can pick Joe number one. I still don't agree with moving AD inside either. But that's a different discussion. However, it is our defense that has been neglected for years and it is our defense that is failing us. Our offense has never been good in Tampa. So telling me that our O is 30th in the league and our D is 19th is no shocker at this point when you realize that other than Ruud we haven't picked a defensive player in the first 60 picks since Booger, who's gone if you didn't notice. Not a huge loss by any stretch as Jovan Haye and Jon Bradley has filled in admirably to get us to 19th on defense. Yeah that's a redeeming stat after 10 years of dominance...NOT!!!
Quote from: Cheveliar on December 06, 2006, 10:46:51 AMStatistically, you are right. However, to me the priority has to be the defense. I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. I don't care how we do it to be honest. I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. I depend on you draft gurus for that. If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMOAgain Chev, no knock on you boys, but you just can't pass on a Franchise LT, especially if you don't one on your roster. With the injury to Beunning and no specific timetable as to when he'll be back in TOP shape (knee injuries take time even after the player has done the rehab, part ofthe recovery is mental), I'd like to see Davis moved inside. I think Davis is better suited to block inside a phonebooth on a consistent basis. We already know about his agility, so I think he could pull without problem, but I would like to see him add a few pounds back to his frame and get back to dominating in the run blocking dept. Lne him up next to a Franchise LT and the left side gets back to business again.
Statistically, you are right. However, to me the priority has to be the defense. I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. I don't care how we do it to be honest. I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. I depend on you draft gurus for that. If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMO
Quote from: Cheveliar on December 06, 2006, 11:05:28 AMQuote from: Cerious on December 06, 2006, 10:56:49 AMQuote from: Cheveliar on December 06, 2006, 10:46:51 AMStatistically, you are right. However, to me the priority has to be the defense. I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. I don't care how we do it to be honest. I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. I depend on you draft gurus for that. If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMOAgain Chev, no knock on you boys, but you just can't pass on a Franchise LT, especially if you don't one on your roster. With the injury to Beunning and no specific timetable as to when he'll be back in TOP shape (knee injuries take time even after the player has done the rehab, part ofthe recovery is mental), I'd like to see Davis moved inside. I think Davis is better suited to block inside a phonebooth on a consistent basis. We already know about his agility, so I think he could pull without problem, but I would like to see him add a few pounds back to his frame and get back to dominating in the run blocking dept. Lne him up next to a Franchise LT and the left side gets back to business again.Maybe you didn't read my post well. I'm not opposed to picking the "franchise" player. I'm opposed to the mindset that he is the most urgent need. I totally disagree with that thought process. Like I stated, we can pick Joe number one. I still don't agree with moving AD inside either. But that's a different discussion. However, it is our defense that has been neglected for years and it is our defense that is failing us. Our offense has never been good in Tampa. So telling me that our O is 30th in the league and our D is 19th is no shocker at this point when you realize that other than Ruud we haven't picked a defensive player in the first 60 picks since Booger, who's gone if you didn't notice. Not a huge loss by any stretch as Jovan Haye and Jon Bradley has filled in admirably to get us to 19th on defense. Yeah that's a redeeming stat after 10 years of dominance...NOT!!!I didn't say OT the most urgent need. If you want to go with most urgent need you could easily say QB. We're talking about the excelling value of a Top 5 pick, and IMO Joe Thomas and Gaines Adams rank equally. I don't think we could go wrong either way.
Also, if you ask me both side of the ball have been neglected for years. Poor drafting, trading away pick and drafting defense heavy 95-99 have come back to haunt this team. I addressed it in another thread, but we drafted DL heavy in 95-99 to the detriment of the offense, we wasted pick on very bad players and then we traded pick away for players and a coach. NOt until the last 3 years can we say that the team has added any premeir talent to the offensive side of the ball since 1995.
Quote from: Cerious on December 06, 2006, 11:20:35 AMAlso, if you ask me both side of the ball have been neglected for years. Poor drafting, trading away pick and drafting defense heavy 95-99 have come back to haunt this team. I addressed it in another thread, but we drafted DL heavy in 95-99 to the detriment of the offense, we wasted pick on very bad players and then we traded pick away for players and a coach. NOt until the last 3 years can we say that the team has added any premeir talent to the offensive side of the ball since 1995.Right. I agree. We're living with the consequences of our past success, and things are turning around, but we have to find a way to fill some wholes on both sides of the ball with this draft.We need (IMO, in more or less this order): DT, DE, WR, OT, S, CB.That's why I'm hoping we can trade down for an extra 2nd rounder and pick up a couple of FAs in key positions...
Maybe you didn't read my post well. Â I'm not opposed to picking the "franchise" player. Â I'm opposed to the mindset that he is the most urgent need. Â I totally disagree with that thought process. Â Like I stated, we can pick Joe number one. Â I still don't agree with moving AD inside either. Â But that's a different discussion. Â However, it is our defense that has been neglected for years and it is our defense that is failing us. Â Our offense has never been good in Tampa. Â So telling me that our O is 30th in the league and our D is 19th is no shocker at this point when you realize that other than Ruud we haven't picked a defensive player in the first 60 picks since Booger, who's gone if you didn't notice. Â Not a huge loss by any stretch as Jovan Haye and Jon Bradley has filled in admirably to get us to 19th on defense. Yeah that's a redeeming stat after 10 years of dominance...NOT!!!
Quote from: Cerious on December 06, 2006, 10:50:57 AMut, this is the same Gruden that drafted Davin Joseph when both Chad Jackson and Santonio Holmes were available and we were said to be considering Manny Lawson before the 49ers took him one pick ahead us. Gruden isn't focused on the offense only, if Gaines Adams is there he'll draft him in a heartbeat because you don't find players in the mold of Juluis Peppers in the 2-3 rounds.Gines Adams is no Peppers truse me....Peppers is a like a Javon Kearse "a freak" Gaines adams is nore of a Simen Rice
ut, this is the same Gruden that drafted Davin Joseph when both Chad Jackson and Santonio Holmes were available and we were said to be considering Manny Lawson before the 49ers took him one pick ahead us. Gruden isn't focused on the offense only, if Gaines Adams is there he'll draft him in a heartbeat because you don't find players in the mold of Juluis Peppers in the 2-3 rounds.
Quote from: Cheveliar on December 06, 2006, 10:46:51 AMStatistically, you are right. Â However, to me the priority has to be the defense. Â I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. Â If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. Â I don't care how we do it to be honest. Â I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. Â All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. Â I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. Â And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Â Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. Â I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. Â I depend on you draft gurus for that. Â If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. Â But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMOAgain Chev, no knock on you boys, but you just can't pass on a Franchise LT, especially if you don't one on your roster. With the injury to Beunning and no specific timetable as to when he'll be back in TOP shape (knee injuries take time even after the player has done the rehab, part ofthe recovery is mental), I'd like to see Davis moved inside. I think Davis is better suited to block inside a phonebooth on a consistent basis. We already know about his agility, so I think he could pull without problem, but I would like to see him add a few pounds back to his frame and get back to dominating in the run blocking dept. Lne him up next to a Franchise LT and the left side gets back to business again.
Statistically, you are right. Â However, to me the priority has to be the defense. Â I'm not sure how the offseason will shake out. Â If we can get Joe and get a stud in the FA market on the dline then we can all jump and shout. Â I don't care how we do it to be honest. Â I'm not a personell guy nor a very good GM type. Â All I know is selecting Joe at number one doesn't fix our problems, not even the immediate ones on offense. Â I know how you guys like to denigrate my oline. Â And to your credit most of the condemnation is deserved, but it's certainly not all their fault as some would like to assert. Â Now you have another rook on a line full of youngsters already. Â I don't know Joe or know of his exploits. Â I depend on you draft gurus for that. Â If he's the end all to be all and based on your analysis of first round LOT's then I guess he's the pick. Â But we need more than Joe to right this ship...We need an equally talented bad azz on the dline to to make this offseason somewhat of a success...IMO
Quote from: Cerious on December 06, 2006, 10:50:57 AMut, this is the same Gruden that drafted Davin Joseph when both Chad Jackson and Santonio Holmes were available and we were said to be considering Manny Lawson before the 49ers took him one pick ahead us. Gruden isn't focused on the offense only, if Gaines Adams is there he'll draft him in a heartbeat because you don't find players in the mold of Juluis Peppers in the 2-3 rounds.Gaines Adams is no Peppers truse me....Peppers is a like a Javon Kearse "a freak" Gaines adams is more of a Rice speed rusher but horrible run stopper