Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I don't understand how there was even a hesitation to go for it.
Maybe we need to check Gruden for balls as how many times did he punt the ball or kick a FG rather than go for it on fourth down??? Amazing how everybody forgets all the **CENSORED**ing and whining they have done the past seven years and think Gruden was the best thing ever. Sorry guys but my dog who was neutered has more balls than Jon Gruden ever had but hey his one liners are awesome though!!
Quote from: CyberDilemma on October 04, 2009, 06:30:16 PMMaybe Raheem had recalled that they went 0-4 when they were 1st and goal at the 5yd line a week ago.I don't think he felt comfortable putting the game all or nothing into JJ's hands right now on one play.
Maybe Raheem had recalled that they went 0-4 when they were 1st and goal at the 5yd line a week ago.
Quote from: dalbuc on October 04, 2009, 06:08:16 PMIt wasn't a real aggressive play but that wasn't an awful call. You kick the FG, make a stop of a bad offense and get the ball back only needing an FG. To me that's not an awful call, it is a 50-50 call.They only needed 3 yards. Get the 3 yards and win the game.Not get the TD and you back them up on their goalline. One defensive stop and you force their kicker (since their punter was hurt) to kick from the endzone and you start your winning drive from the 40.But by kicking the FG, you assure yourself that you must make a stop. You must drive the ball. And your kicker, who missed 2 FGs, has to make a goal.....JUST TO TIE.Raheem made a bad decision.
It wasn't a real aggressive play but that wasn't an awful call. You kick the FG, make a stop of a bad offense and get the ball back only needing an FG. To me that's not an awful call, it is a 50-50 call.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on October 05, 2009, 06:43:39 PM4-yard play for the win > 61-81 yard drive for tie/win.Try 45 yards. Nowhere NEAR the yardage you describe.
4-yard play for the win > 61-81 yard drive for tie/win.
It was giving the ball to Clifton Smith in that situation.
No reason to put the game on the line on a single passing play from a very inexperienced QB who struggled in the second half. Kick the FG, then when you get the ball back you have a chance to drive half the field and kick the game winner.
The problem with this line of thinking, IMO, is that you are expecting that "very inexperienced QB who struggled in the half" to string together multiple (successful) passing plays - instead of one passing play for 3 yards.