Matt Jones is better.
Correction....Matt Jones was better. � Unless you were at the workouts to judge them all equally you are just making an assumption based on his past. � I'd rather not pay a coke head that no one else wanted. � Yamon can also be a special teamer.
I'd rather have a proven threat that was on pace for 80+ receptions than some certified bust journeymen that has struggled to find a role in an NFL offense. Who was on a team that NEEDED his services, positional speaking.
Michael Clayton had an 80+ reception year, so that makes him good, right?
That happened 4 years ago., for you to bring that up is irrelevant to my point. Jones' success occurred last year; way more relevant then what happened in 2005. He isn't your typical WR either, he was a project coming out of the draft. Jones was mostly a QB so it took him time to adjust to the NFL as a wide out. Last year, everything clicked together besides his off field decision making...