Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Trust me...Brady & the Patriots toyed yesterday. Had they preferred to do so, they could have blown the Bucs out by more than the 28 they achieved.
Quote from: PreferNFL on October 26, 2009, 10:39:41 PMTrust me...Brady & the Patriots toyed yesterday. Had they preferred to do so, they could have blown the Bucs out by more than the 28 they achieved.It's obvious to some of us, although to others that theory is considered ridiculous. The only thing ridiculous to me is our lack of direction.
Trust me...Brady & the Patriots toyed yesterday. Had they preferred to do so, they could have blown the Bucs out by more than the 28 they achieved.
Quote from: ufojoe55 on October 26, 2009, 09:45:03 PMProgress on the D Line yesterday. Now if we can get some consistent play from the QB, we will win a few games. I think.Cyber, when was the last time you posted anything positive about any aspect of this team or any player? When Sammie had the return for TD and a few nice catches/nice moves, did you start a thread about him?How exactly do you want me to be positive? There isnt much to be positive about when you're 0-7 (0-11 streak), statistically among the worst teams in the NFL, a cheap ownership, and a coaching staff that is completely incompetent and has no idea what the hell they are doing?And Im supposed to be positive? Where is the DL improving? I've watched every minute of every game and I dont see anywhere that they are improving.
Progress on the D Line yesterday. Now if we can get some consistent play from the QB, we will win a few games. I think.Cyber, when was the last time you posted anything positive about any aspect of this team or any player? When Sammie had the return for TD and a few nice catches/nice moves, did you start a thread about him?
Quote from: Escobar on October 26, 2009, 10:50:09 PMQuote from: PreferNFL on October 26, 2009, 10:39:41 PMTrust me...Brady & the Patriots toyed yesterday. Had they preferred to do so, they could have blown the Bucs out by more than the 28 they achieved.It's obvious to some of us, although to others that theory is considered ridiculous. The only thing ridiculous to me is our lack of direction.I dont get it. So Brady could have thrown it a little better if wanted to on the passes that were intercepted? The times they went 3 and out they really could have got a first down if they didnt toy around? They decided to go serious on the Titans and run the score up over 50 points but they like us better and decided to hold back?
I wouldn't bother explaining yourself. Joe's MO is to side with the minority opinion on literally everything, I have serious doubts he believes half of what he says...he just likes to get a rise out of people.
The frustrating thing about the defense is every time it seems like something's fixed, something else breaks.
Quote from: Escobar on October 26, 2009, 10:31:13 PMI wouldn't bother explaining yourself. Joe's MO is to side with the minority opinion on literally everything, I have serious doubts he believes half of what he says...he just likes to get a rise out of people. LOL. Go hang out with Java. He's into that sort of thing. Among other things.I stand behind every one of my posts.
What is this Titans comparison I keep reading? Different team, different week. There are so many variables that go into each game, to compare the two as if the NFL is some kind of software program that spits out consistent results based on a set of factors is asinine. I really think those having trouble picking up the idea that the Pats may have lacked intensity/competitiveness against us were probably never part of a team themselves.
Quote from: Escobar on October 26, 2009, 11:32:00 PMWhat is this Titans comparison I keep reading? Different team, different week. There are so many variables that go into each game, to compare the two as if the NFL is some kind of software program that spits out consistent results based on a set of factors is asinine. I really think those having trouble picking up the idea that the Pats may have lacked intensity/competitiveness against us were probably never part of a team themselves. they are way different teams and situations but the point being made i believe is that if a great coach like Jeff Fisher can go 0-6 and his team look bewildered then it is very possible that a SOME of our woes aren't necessarily due to poor coaching but simply lack of execution by the players and a lack of cohesiveness with so many changes happening with different personnel groups and new schemes etc.i don't see how yuou can't acknowledge that argument. A lot of people say it is all about the coach but we know Fisher is a good HC and they've often looked worse than us.