Welcome, Guest
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10

 on: Today at 03:37:05 PM 
Last post by Dolorous Jason
If all you need is a QB as the final piece of the puzzle ,  you can get up into the top 10. Trade a shlt load of picks if you have to. It doesn't matter at that point.

 on: Today at 03:36:06 PM 
Last post by dalbuc
Don't think it is a smokescreen. They may want a QB, which one they want to take is another question. If there is smoke it is around the object of their affection. When you bop Glennon down the depth chart and put your future in the hands of anyone with an Mc in their last name you are committing career suicide unless you find a better option quickly.

 on: Today at 03:35:53 PM 
Last post by bizkitlimped
Bridgewater was there and I passed on him thinking I could get carr or someone in the second. It didn't happen, so I took Shazier. Thought about depth at G and C with the 3rd but i didn't draft on need. Took easley. Doubled up on WR's and finally took a QB.

Used walterfootballs' big board



 on: Today at 03:33:13 PM 
Last post by Dolorous Jason
Winning !!!!

He so mad right now....

 on: Today at 03:30:33 PM 
Last post by dalbuc
Hell yeah , Pepsi. Load up on wr . This is the draft to do it. Worry about QB later when all the weapons are in place. We've got the 2 year bridge with McCown.

If  he is a bridge then we won't be looking at prospects any better than the ones we have this year because we won't be picking where the elite prospects are. 

 on: Today at 03:29:07 PM 
Last post by Dolorous Jason
Those McCowns are athletic as hell. Whole family.

 on: Today at 03:28:42 PM 
Last post by dalbuc
I dont think we would draft DE early in this draft but I can see them drafting someone at DE at some point. Our depth still sucks.

Bowers and Means will be fighting an uphill battle for a roster spot.

I think we will draft more depth all along the DL. We've got some decent starters but other than AC/Goldson I don see any reason to like our depth at one of the other 3 spots.

 on: Today at 03:24:59 PM 
Last post by Benchwarmer#1
Yeah, good company around 32.

It's not the end-all, but it's nice to have a smart qb. It's for this reason, and his ability to do a little bit of everything, that I think manziel will do well in the nfl.

It sure doesn't hurt his stock anyway.

 on: Today at 03:23:08 PM 
Last post by jeanclaud
I'm not a fan of the QBs at 7 so if all the elite non-QBs are gone I would trade down for pretty much anything to someone in the 8-11 range and take Donald. I think the Giants are hoping he's there when they pick.

Otherwise I would trade down into the 15-20 range and take Cooks or OBJ (preference to Cooks). That would net us at least another 2nd in this draft. With that flexibility we could easily get a starting guard and see where the value is at DL, QB, TE, CB.

I think with the depth in this draft a lot of teams are going to want to trade down without many buyers, but I still like threads like this. We still have another 3 weeks of what-ifs though...

 on: Today at 03:21:22 PM 
Last post by dalbuc
Again, if the test showed something that confirmed a , we question his smarts thing it means something. The fact that he ran the offense, not running a check with me on the sidelines thing, means I do not care what his wonderlic score is.  He has the smarts to run an offense. 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10

Hide Tools Show Tools