Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: In Hindsight....Should the Bucs have stayed at #5 and drafted Morris Claiborne ? « previous next »
Page: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 ... 33

tbc_bucs

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 4044
Offline
#255 : December 09, 2012, 03:52:49 PM

We also have to look at what the scheme is asking Barron to do. Ronde plays in the box. I would imagine that as soon as Ronde retires, it will be Barron in the box, that is his game and I believe he will be an elite SS in the box,


Biggs3535

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 31635
Offline
#256 : December 09, 2012, 03:58:25 PM

Barron got worked by a TE nobody's ever heard of.


Boid Fink

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 54546
Offline
#257 : December 09, 2012, 04:00:27 PM

Barron is not impressing me at all. 


JDouble

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 29156
Offline
#258 : December 09, 2012, 04:12:25 PM

Grimm was way better as a rookie. Ahmad Black is better too. Kid has some serious work to do if he's gonna live up to his draft status.


TheAman

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2515
Offline
#259 : December 09, 2012, 04:33:43 PM

Does the team get Doug Martin or Lavonte David without making this trade?  It's possible, but not definite.

CANTCME

***
Second String

Posts : 215
Offline
#260 : December 09, 2012, 04:40:14 PM

Barron is not impressing me at all.

I can't even remember the last time the guy has made a play

BucsGuru

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 6397
Offline
#261 : December 09, 2012, 04:47:02 PM

Yep...and we should have NEVER traded Steve Young too....thanks hindsight.

Biggs3535

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 31635
Offline
#262 : December 09, 2012, 04:52:07 PM

Does the team get Doug Martin or Lavonte David without making this trade?  It's possible, but not definite.

No, it's not definite.  But the Bucs obviously liked those players enough to trade up for them, so I don't know why that would have changed if Morris was the pick.  They just would have needed to use other draft resources, i.e. future draft picks or multiple late-rounders.  God knows the late-rounders were wasted anyway.


The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23437
Offline
#263 : December 09, 2012, 05:12:41 PM

Not giving up on Barron this early, but have to say Claiborne might have been the wiser choice looking back.



chace1986

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 13449
Offline
#264 : December 09, 2012, 05:19:10 PM

This should be no question at this point...Barron is playing God-awful. If Grimm weren't on the IR, I would now be hoping that they would bench Barron for Grimm. Opposing OCs should just run plays that target #24. Would be an automatic first down/TD.
: December 09, 2012, 05:21:33 PM chace1986


Dolorous Jason

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17667
Offline
#265 : December 09, 2012, 06:35:46 PM

Not giving up on Barron this early, but have to say Claiborne might have been the wiser choice looking back.

Good thing you are looking back and not looking at Dallas Cowboy games...Claiborne is struggling as much as Barron.

What is your point? I was wrong? Ok. You win. I was wrong.

           

NotDeadYet

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 6918
Offline
#266 : December 09, 2012, 06:51:27 PM

     By now, I think most posters realize by staying at #5, we would NOT have gotten both David and Martin. Definitely way too early to give up on Barron. Without knowing actual player responsibilities, can't really judge his play. Other than failing to get his head around on a few coverage plays I recall, only his coaches know...

The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23437
Offline
#267 : December 09, 2012, 07:07:52 PM

Not giving up on Barron this early, but have to say Claiborne might have been the wiser choice looking back.

Good thing you are looking back and not looking at Dallas Cowboy games...Claiborne is struggling as much as Barron.



I have seen a few of the Cowgirls games, MoMo is doing much better than Barron IMO.



CalcuttaRain

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 20252
Offline
#268 : December 09, 2012, 07:11:29 PM

     By now, I think most posters realize by staying at #5, we would NOT have gotten both David and Martin. Definitely way too early to give up on Barron. Without knowing actual player responsibilities, can't really judge his play. Other than failing to get his head around on a few coverage plays I recall, only his coaches know...

exactly

Show the bravest of the brave kids that you have their back.  Go to http://www.childrenscancercenter.org/

Just check out the site or maybe like them on Facebook . .  or Share the site on Facebook, re-tweet one of their tweets.  Not everyone can give money to support this great cause, but its easy to give 10 seconds of your time to help spread the word about The Children\\\\\\\'s Cancer Center

bucsquad

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1345
Offline
#269 : December 09, 2012, 07:12:28 PM

Sure but there's better rookies than Claiborne. Just at CB I'd rather have Jenkins or Heyward.

And I was a fan of Claiborne but this hindsight stuff gets annoying, especially just through the rookie years.
: December 09, 2012, 07:14:59 PM bucsquad

Page: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 ... 33
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: In Hindsight....Should the Bucs have stayed at #5 and drafted Morris Claiborne ? « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools