Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Mewelde Moore trade not dead « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 4 ... 19

The White Tiger

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 11371
Offline
#15 : October 05, 2007, 10:51:54 AM

LOL - He's a good stop-gap, and DTG you  may have proven that he is good in mop-up - spot duty back. I still don't think you'd see consistent 100yd performances from Pitt this year as the feature back. He's ok in certain situations, requiring certain match-ups to succeed.

Again - Gruden wants another back for some reason...

Incomparable sig by Incognito

DanTurksGhost

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 19746
Offline
#16 : October 05, 2007, 10:52:41 AM

I should have said 100 yards RUSHING.

Find that one.

The last one? 127 yards rushing in 2005 vs MIA.

bradentonian

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27836
Offline
#17 : October 04, 2007, 02:58:08 PM

5th round pick, but I think the Sims trade was for a conditional pick.

Ok DTG, glad that I am not the only on reporting this also watch out for everyone who wants a link

That sucks, considering the Raiders spent a conditional 5th on Gerard Warren who already has 3 sacks as a backup...  Hopefully Sims develops into an impact player


Boid Fink

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 54536
Online
#18 : October 05, 2007, 10:50:33 AM

I think the last time Pittman had a 100 yard game was actually in the Superbowl. As a matter, I think that might have been his best game ever as a feature back...

Pittman regular season 100 yard games as a Buc:

2006:
107 vs CLE
109 vs SEA

2005:
126 vs DET
138 vs MIA
99 vs NO

2004:
164 vs CHI
158 vs KC
106 vs SF
163 vs CAR
141 vs NO

2003:
164 vs ATL
141 vs IND
117 vs DAL
103 vs NO
105 vs ATL

2002:
148 vs CLE
103 vs DET
118 vs CHI
I should have said 100 yards RUSHING.

Find that one.


bveghte

*
Pro Bowler
*****
Posts : 1692
Offline
#19 : October 04, 2007, 03:05:27 PM

Sims was for a 7th round pick. Not sure how they reconciled that with the Plummer conditional pick, but the latter must be a 2009 pick, because it is conditional on whether he reports to camp NEXT year AFTER the 2008  draft. Sims was definitely a 7th rounder though, I remember that. So we could also trade our 6th rounder.

dalbuc

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 21581
Offline
#20 : October 04, 2007, 03:21:19 PM

Moore would be a good spare part to plug in. Day 1 is simply not the price for that sort of 3rd wheel in a 3 wheel system but a day 2 pick gets a lot more interesting.

All posts are opinions in case you are too stupid to figure that out on your own without me saying it over and over.

gharen

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1639
Offline
#21 : October 04, 2007, 03:41:18 PM

I don't want Moore, if that means they won't go after Michael Turner in the offseason. We need a feature back with home run ability. I would hate to go into next season with Moore, Pittman and Graham as our backs. Now, I wouldn't mind at all going into next season with Turner, Moore as the third down back and Graham!

bradentonian

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27836
Offline
#22 : October 04, 2007, 03:51:44 PM

Would still love to look at a guy like Jason Snelling from the Falcon's practice squad.  He can be a power runner or bruising FB and is an outstanding receiver out of the backfield


Uncle Stan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 17496
Offline
#23 : October 04, 2007, 03:52:40 PM

No matter what we do this year, the Bucs will add a quality RB next year.


Learn to disagree without being disagreeable-Ronald Reagan circa 1981

Caveat Emperor

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1270
Offline
#24 : October 04, 2007, 03:55:49 PM

I don't want Moore, if that means they won't go after Michael Turner in the offseason. We need a feature back with home run ability.

Michael Turner is not a feature back.

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27771
Offline
#25 : October 04, 2007, 04:04:58 PM

Maybe I'm crazy but I think Moore could compete with a healthy Cadillac, too.

FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

alldaway

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 37348
Offline
#26 : October 04, 2007, 04:05:44 PM

Quote
Michael Turner is not a feature back.

I disagree.

Turner has a better shot as a feature back than Mewelde Moore.  


SunnyD

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 8593
Offline
#27 : October 04, 2007, 04:13:56 PM

Quote
Michael Turner is not a feature back.

I disagree.

Turner has a better shot as a feature back than Mewelde Moore. 




I disagree.


Turner has a habit of putting the ball on the ground and he just does not seem overly explosive to me.

DanTurksGhost

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 19746
Offline
#28 : October 05, 2007, 10:47:53 AM

99 vs NO doesn't count, doesn't count, doesn't count!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know, but I just had to list it.

gump

****
Starter

Posts : 266
Offline
#29 : October 04, 2007, 04:33:19 PM

Heard we offered a 6th rounder.
Page: 1 2 3 4 ... 19
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Mewelde Moore trade not dead « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools