Home » Articles » Draft » Pewter Report Grades The Bucs' 2011 Draft
  • increase font size
  • Default font size
  • decrease font size

May 2, 2011 @ 12:33 pm
Current rating: 2.50 Stars/2 Votes

Pewter Report Grades The Bucs' 2011 Draft

Written by Scott
Scott Reynolds


Publisher E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
What grade did the Tampa Bay Buccaneers earn for their 2011 draft? Pewter Report's Scott Reynolds breaks down Tampa Bay's draft round-by-round and dishes out individual grades for each new Buccaneer in this post-draft article.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers deserve an “A-minus” as their collective draft grade for their efforts in the 2011 NFL Draft. Here I break down each selection and offers up analysis and a grade for each of Tampa Bay’s eight draft picks this year.

If Clayborn can replicate or come close to replicating his junior season at Iowa when he had 20 tackles for loss, 11.5 sacks, four forced fumbles and a blocked punt for a touchdown, he will be worth the 20th overall selection and likely become the pass-rushing threat off the edge that the Bucs have lacked since Simeon Rice left following the 2006 season. If his production in the NFL more closely resembles that of his senior season when his numbers dipped to seven tackles for loss, 3.5 sacks and one forced fumble, he will be no better than former mediocre Bucs defensive ends in the first round like Regan Upshaw and Marcus Jones.

Reason to hope: Clayborn is a big, physical defensive end that plays with a nasty demeanor that has sorely been lacking since the departure of Warren Sapp in 2004. Clayborn’s toughness and size will play a big role in helping Tampa Bay’s porous run defense. The fact that he did have a double-digit sack season at Iowa shows he has the potential to be that kind of player in the NFL.

Reason to mope: Clayborn doesn’t have elite speed to run around offensive tackles nor does he have a wide array of pass rush moves to run through pass protectors. It may take a while for Clayborn to come close to becoming a double-digit sacker – if he achieves that level at all.

Final analysis: With California defensive end Cameron Jordan still on the board, the Bucs will be criticized for passing on him if Jordan, who was drafted with the 24th overall pick, winds up being more productive.

Draft pick grade: B

To say that this is a risky pick is an understatement given the reports of his torn meniscus injury and the condition of his right knee. Some reports suggest that Bowers may need the controversial microfracture knee surgery or that he has a degenerative knee condition. The team disputes those reports, but cannot say exactly when Bowers, who is still rehabbing his knee from offseason surgery, will be ready to play in 2011. Still, the potential reward was too great for general manager Mark Dominik to ignore and if Bowers, who led the nation with 15.5 sacks and was second with 26 tackles for loss, can get his knee healthy and have it stay that way, the Bucs may have the steal in the draft.

Reason to hope: If Bowers’ rehab goes as well as possible and his knee remains healthy, he could become Tampa Bay’s best pass rusher because of his unique blend of size, speed and power. Bowers has the ability to school slower right tackles and the potential to dominate the way Michael Strahan and Kevin Carter did from the left end position in their prime.

Reason to mope: Should Bowers’ knee already be shot, not respond to rehab or get reinjured, not only would Tampa Bay be without a second-round pick, they would also be sorely lacking in the pass-rushing department because Bowers has the potential to become the best sacker on the Buccaneers roster.

Final analysis: The Bucs picked the best player available with the 51st overall pick in Bowers – a player that could have been the first overall pick had he been healthy. Bowers’ knee injury makes this a risky pick, but the potential upside of a high reward is worth the risk.

Draft pick grade: A-

Foster was the nation’s second-leading tackler last year with 163 tackles and he has a knack for creating turnovers with eight forced fumbles and four interceptions in his Huskies career. Not only is Foster adept at stuffing the run and dropping into coverage, he is also quite the blitzer with 10.5 career sacks, including 6.5 during his senior season. The Bucs need more size, physical play and production from their linebacking corps and the versatile Mason brings all of those elements to Tampa Bay’s defense.

Reason to hope: Foster has the talent and football IQ to be a starter as a rookie. He can play any of the three linebacker spots and the team would be wise to put the 6-foot-1, 245-pounder at middle linebacker and have him compete with Tyrone McKenzie so that Tampa Bay can move on from Barrett Ruud, who will likely be asking for at least $5 million per year once he hits free agency. With too many of his tackles coming downfield rather than at the point of attack, Ruud is not worth it – especially when Foster is stout against the run.

Reason to mope: There really isn’t much downside to the selection of Foster. He did not time very well at the combine, but improved his 40-yard dash time to 4.67 at his pro day. Foster is a good athlete, but not a superb one. That may be the only hole in his game transitioning to the next level.

Final analysis: Getting Foster in the third round is a steal for Tampa Bay. To get a highly productive player to fill a need this late in the third round was simply shrewd drafting by the Buccaneers.

Draft pick grade: A

The Bucs feel like grabbing Stocker in the fourth round was a steal, even though Tampa Bay had to trade up 12 spots in the fourth round of the draft to do so. In a draft that was not deep at the tight end position, the Bucs got the last most complete player in Stocker, who is equally capable of being an in-line blocker and a receiver. Stocker was underused at Tennessee where he only caught 85 passes for 956 yards and eight touchdowns in his career, including 39 receptions for 417 yards and two scores as a senior.

Reason to hope: Given the fact that he essentially has two fourth-round draft picks invested in him (including next year’s fourth-rounder), Stocker is all but assured of being the number two tight end behind Kellen Winslow. That means he will be a quasi-starter as long as he picks up the offense.

Reason to mope: The drafting of Stocker and the investment the team has in him likely means that the team will not be re-signing veteran John Gilmore, who was the team’s best blocking tight end. Gilmore showed some stealth receiving skills last year and was a great veteran locker room leader. There will be a lot of pressure for Stocker to step in and become a force as a run blocker because that is not Winslow’s forte. Plus giving up a fourth-rounder next year could come back to bite Tampa Bay depending on the talent the Bucs won't have a shot at acquiring.

Final analysis: Tampa Bay had a higher draft grade (second round) on Stocker than a fourth-rounder and that’s why the team was so aggressive in trading up to get him. Stocker is a better receiver than his college production indicates and he figures to be more of a weapon in the passing game than Gilmore was.

Draft grade: A-

Tampa Bay selected one of college football’s top defensive playmakers in the fifth round with the drafting of Black, who grew up in nearby Lakeland and went to the University of Florida. Black, a lifelong Bucs fan, has 13 career interceptions, three forced fumbles, three defensive touchdowns, one fumble recovery and one blocked kick. As a senior, this defensive team captain had five interceptions and three forced fumbles. He capped off his Gators career with two interceptions, including one for a touchdown and six tackles as the Outback Bowl MVP.

Reason to hope: With Tanard Jackson’s NFL future in doubt due to his suspension, the Bucs needed another ballhawking safety for their secondary. Black fits the bill as he had a hand in creating 17 turnovers in college. He is also a hard-hitter and a sure tackler, evidenced by his 244 career stops. In big games Black made big time plays.

Reason to mope: Black does not pass the eyeball test as he is only 5-foot-9, 187 pounds. He also ran a 4.84 at the combine, but improved that time by running a 4.75 at his pro day. He’s not fast on a stopwatch, but due to his instincts he plays much faster. But is he big enough and fast enough to play at the NFL level? Even if he is strictly a backup on defense at the NFL level, Black has the makings of being a standout special teams player.

Final analysis: Tampa Bay took a gamble on a player that is short and slow by NFL standards at the safety position, but the risk is lessened because the Bucs only spent a fifth-round pick on Black. If he eventually becomes a starter, which is possible due to his toughness, instincts, intelligence and playmaking ability, Black will be a late-round steal for the Bucs.

Draft grade: A

The Bucs went “big back hunting,” according to general manager Mark Dominik, with the selection of the 5-foot-11, 240-pound Bradford, who rushed for 1,585 yards and 16 touchdowns while averaging 5.9 yards per carry during his USC career. The Bucs want to team Bradford with LeGarrette Blount to form a physical, powerful running back tandem. By having two big backs – three if you count Earnest Graham – the Bucs can always stick with their north-south approach when it comes to running the ball, even when Blount is not in the game.

Reason to hope: Bradford has the size to play fullback or halfback and he is used to splitting carries at USC. Those traits should acclimate him well to the running back room at One Buc Place. With Bradford getting drafted so late, it seems like he has a chip on his shoulder entering the NFL, which is certainly not a bad thing for rookies to have.

Reason to mope: Looking at most of the highlights and big runs of Bradford’s career, the blocking was so superb at USC on those plays that he is to the second level and even into the secondary before any defender touches him. There aren’t many massive holes in the NFL on a regular basis due to the talent level of the league’s defensive players.

Final analysis: Bradford may be a nice sleeper due to his blend of power and quick burst. He is a nifty runner for a big back and can also catch and block. The Bucs clearly got some great intel from USC coaches Monte Kiffin and Joe Barry, who used to be on Tampa Bay’s staff for years.

Draft grade: B

The Bucs felt fortunate to grab a talented cornerback like Gaitor in the seventh round as he probably carried a fifth- or sixth-round grade due to collegiate production. Gaitor played in 49 games at FIU and recorded 197 tackles (136 solo), 25 passes defensed, 11 interceptions, one forced fumble and one fumble recovery during his career. Gaitor impressed the Tampa Bay staff during his pre-draft visit because he wanted to play for the Buccaneers so bad.

Reason to hope: Gaitor was a consistent performer at FIU, notching at least two interceptions in each of his four seasons in his collegiate career. He returned three of his picks for touchdowns, which speaks to his playmaking ability. With a former seventh-rounder like E.J. Biggers coming from a smaller school like Western Michigan and excelling as a nickel corner and an occasional starter, there is hope that lightning could strike twice and that Gaitor could be another seventh-round steal.

Reason to mope: At just under 5-foot-10, and weighing 177 pounds, Gaitor resembles the smallish Elbert Mack in terms of stature. He will need to add some size to effectively play against the bigger receivers he’ll face in the NFL. At first glance, he seems like nothing more than a special teams contributor as a rookie.

Final analysis: Tampa Bay had a chance to draft Pittsburgh defensive end Greg Romeus to add yet another pass rusher to the mix, but passed in favor of Gaitor. Given the fact that Da’Quan Bowers has medical issues with his knee, drafting Romeus might have been wiser even though his own health problems caused him to slide to the seventh round.

Draft grade: C+

The Bucs like to grab special teams candidates in the seventh round and like Hardy’s athleticism and skill set to not only potentially develop into an NFL tight end, but perhaps more importantly to cover kicks and punts. Although he only played in 28 games at Idaho, Hardy caught 39 passes for 691 yards and three touchdowns as a junior and had 32 receptions for 545 yards and one touchdown before a broken arm sidelined him for the last five game of the 2010 season.

Reason to hope: Hardy is considered to be more of an athlete than Stocker is and can run in the high 4.7-range. He brings more athleticism than Ryan Purvis and Nathan Overbay possess too, and gives Tampa Bay another fluid receiving tight end whose skills are more inline with that of Winslow’s.

Reason to mope: With the drafting of Stocker, the Bucs had four tight ends in Winslow, Purvis and Overbay. The selection of Hardy adds another candidate for the battle to be the third tight end in Tampa Bay when either Purvis or Overbay seemed competent enough to handle the position. At 249 pounds, Hardy must add size and strength to hold up as a blocker.

Final analysis: The Bucs selected two tight ends in the 2011 NFL Draft, which may have been a bit excessive. With potentially three linebackers hitting free agency this year in Barrett Ruud, Quincy Black and Adam Hayward, it would have been nice to see Tampa Bay draft another linebacker like Marshall’s Mario Harvey or Maryland’s Alex Wujciak instead.

Draft grade: C+
Last modified on Monday, 02 May 2011 13:32

Only registered users can rate articles!


  • avatar

    Gaitor makes the team. Book it.
  • avatar

    Great article. I love the draft and with the exception of the final TE (though not sure what else was in the cupboard at that point, am stoked to see the guys at TC (assuming we have one). In watching the video, I like the attitude you see in Claiborne, Bowers, Foster, Black and even Gaitor. It will be tougher for some of the young guys to see the field but raising the competition level is good for the team. Another well orchestrated draft by the FO (on paper) but like all of them, the proof will be in the production.
  • avatar

    Good draft; good analysis. Fired up!
  • avatar

    I give a "B" simply cuz Bowers uncertainty. But thrilled we are cutting dead weight and solidifying the trenches with youth and athleticism and leadership to push the team. I guarantee the Bucs draft for secondary and O-line next year.. and with that Im more confident we will be able to compete for the longterm without having to sign free agents and plug guys in every off season.. great job to the gm and coach to sticking to their philosophy in big physical captains on defense and drafting people that wanna be here and wanna be apart of a movement.. Great Job... Also hope we let Rudd, Trueblood go to allow for our young players to develop
  • avatar

    kudos to SR and CC!!!. heard SR on the kingdavid show this am, and he showed his knowledge/expertise on the Bucs and the needs/hits/misses..etc. Impressed by the the "realistic" view of the Bucs draft. PR gets alot of crticism for not being the "first" to report, but they know their sh!t!!! They're not "bloggers"..they're Buc beat INSIDERS, who do their due dilligence before posting BS. Agree...that would love to have taken Romeus(Pitt). Can never have enough pass-rushers...IMO..WAY more impact on DL than secondary. DL wins SB's ..CB/S do not, IMHO, of course.
  • avatar

    FlBoy..you are SPOT on!!! don't know if you remember, but we had our disagreements, but You know your SH!t, unlike some of the 'Gru/Allen" worshippers..ie."jongruden" None of us know how this draft will turn out but Ill take my chances with Bowers.vs.Dex jax, or Foster.vs.Pissca..and on and on and on with Stroughter, Grimm, Brizcoe, Larsen, Carter...and, oh yea..Ahmad Black.. and dont sleep on Stocker, and the kid from FIU, Gaitor...My God..Dominik is light years ahead of "jongruden". Blount!!!Bennn!!!Willliams..have a feeling Foster is goin to light a "fiire" in the LB's on this team, and don't forget, McKenzie(sp?)...good luck Redskins and...Gru..with all the players he sees..they're ALL ALL-STARS"..Gru.."Ilove this guys...BS!
  • avatar

    chev loves clayborns nasty attitude......and i'm convinced rah and dom know all about both of these 2 des......think they go on to have great seasons and want to show the other teams what they missed.
  • avatar

    I agree with the overall "A", and believe the Bucs now have the personnel to stop the run. I would much rather have 280 pound DE Bookends than 265 pound DEs who are liabilities in stopping the run. Claiborne gets his sacks overpowering people. As long as he gets the sacks that is great, and if he doesn't he is likely to push back his man and disrupt the offense. At last we have two middle linebackers who can stop runners at the point of attack. Now I agree with most of you that we should have taken Romeus for insurance instead of Gaitor, who does not impress me as more than a special teams player. I really like Hardy and feel he can develop into a deep threat TE to replace Winslow when he retires, and Stocker can be both a blocker and a threat down the seam. I especially love the idea of tandem Big Backs wearing down the other team's defense and making the play action vertical game go big time. Add some moderate priced free agents and the Bucs are on the way!!!
  • avatar

    I really want to like this draft. But when I look across the "new" D line I see a healthy Miller, Bennett and Okum but also the rehabbing McCoy, Price, Moore and Bowers. With Clayborn unproven (not mentioning his "condition") what's left is Crowder and White. I like Crowder's play, but where are the numbers? With pass rush improvement critical, it would have been nice to have no question marks next to any of the DE candidates - and maybe more of them.
  • avatar

    I was questioning the 7th round selections as well. It should be well documented that I was very high on Greg Romeus. I guess his back is more messed up than we know, but he still seemed well worth it in the 7th round. Gaitor seems to have potential and Hardy seems to be a speedy recieving TE. Either way, both picks seem to be designed for the special teams.
  • avatar

    I agree with these grades. At least enough not to point out anything here. I agree with the comment below about Jordan's small arms and big belly. The only DE I would have taken over Clayborn when our pick rolled around was Bowers and we ended up with him anyway. The biggest point I want to make is we would have had to at least give up our 2nd rounder to move up and get Kerrigan (my #1 choice for a DE). I would rather have Clayborn and Bowers than just Kerrigan.
  • avatar

    Overall I think this ws a good draft. The Defensive line has a ton of potential now, but injuries are a factor. If McCoy, Price, Clayborn and Bowers can stay healthy then the run defense should be much improved and the pass rush will be more productive. There's a good rotation of DTs with Miller and Okam, but I would agree that Romeus could've added to the rotation at DE and provided too much value to pass up late in the draft.
  • avatar

    I just want the lockout to end. (OL will be addressed with undrafted FA's when the lockout is over.)
  • avatar

    Great draft, Dominick is a rising star
  • avatar

    A- Seems about right. I think the only real misses were not getting an OG or a CB that could develop into starting caliber (Gaitor strikes me as a year or two seeing special teams, at best, before someone replaces him). I also agree with PR, would have rather had Romeus in the 7th, and be able to start Bowers on the PUP. I'm still not sold on Clayborn, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
  • avatar

    Oh jonnyg, Ye of little faith. There's more to playing defensive line than sacks. I've said many times that a defensive lineman is in on 50 plays a game. For 16 games that's 800 plays. Yet he is considered a sack artist if he gets only 8 QB take-downs, which is 1%. I'm more concerned with the other 99% of the plays. I like Clayborn's nastiness. As the PR boys said, we haven't had that since Sapp and Nickerson. I think it's important to look at the whole body of work in college and not just focus solely on the senior year. I would have liked selecting Romeus in the 7th instead of Gaitor.
  • avatar

    "jon gruden" hehe ...enough said
  • avatar

    Listen guys Clayborn wasnt my first choice either. But if you look back now at all the guys on ESPN and stuff talking about the draftees, everyone is saying Jordan isnt a true pass rusher anyway. He looks real awkward to me with small arms and a big belly. Not like a DE at all. And yea ill admit Clayborn looks a lil chubby right now but if you look, him and Bowers are both 6'3 280lbs. And Clayborn said they wanted him that big at Iowa and he plans and cutting weight right now. I really do see Clayborn now becoming a monster DE for us.
  • avatar

    I think one of the main reason that Tampa selected Clayborn over Jordan is that Clayborn has over come sistutations all his life, and I think that not only selected Clayborn and Bowers that other teams will say why didn't we do that. I THINK THESE FOUR DEFENSIVE PLAYERS BETWEEN THIS YEAR AND LAST YEAR DRAFT IS THE CORNERSTONE OF THE TAMPA BAY BUCS. CAN YOU IMAGINE WITH CLAYBORN ON ONE DE AND BOWERS ON THE OTHER SIDE PLUS PRICE AND MCCOY. TEAMS THIS YEAR WILL SAY HOW IN THE WORLD ARE WE GONNA STOP THIS EVER IMPROVING DEFENSIVE LINE. Remember this is only 4 players of the 11 man defensive side of the board. IT IS A WIN WIN SISTUTATION. LOOKING FORWARD TO THE BUCS IN DEC WHEN THIS 66 YRS TAMPA NATIVE (class of 64 HB Plant High School Graduate) will be coming home to SEE TAMPA PLAY DALLAS COWBOYS.to my home I grew up and love when Tampa Bay area only had 135,000 in the area. I HOPE TAMPA WINS MORE GAMES THEN LAST YR. HOW ABOUT TAMPA GO 8-0 AT HOME BUC FANS AROUND THE WORLD. LETS PLAY FOOTBALL>GO BUCS GL Hicks RET USA MEDIC>
  • avatar

    Claiborn had only three sacks in his senor season and has one pass rush move which is the bull rush that is hilarous to know that. Freaking Claiborn is a joke as I have wathed him many times. Posters want to make excuses for him saying it was the scheme which is even more hilarous. How many De's do you know aren''t requred to rush the passer? thats right none. So please stop wth this two gap scheme where he wasn't required to rush. The rest of the draft is easly an A, love the pick of Foster, Bowers and Black. Claiborn a total miss. Overall A-
  • avatar

    I'm excited about the prospect of having a young, non-stop, diruptive group on the D-line. I know every Tampa fan gets sick of hearing how they don't have a pass rush and can't stop the run--I hope now they do. I fear the sub 5-10 corner not named Ronde. Mack has gotten trucked several times over the past 2 seasons. But I'm willing to wait and see. I also fear the sub 5-10 running back. I like the fact that the Bucs' are going to run over people rather than around them. Very pleased with Stocker even at the price--no team believes Winslow is going to block & they all play pass. Two TE sets with Blount sounds awesome. Most of all, with the huge trade Atlanta did-I can only assume they thought they were Superbowl bound for the most part--can't wait to break their hearts.
  • avatar

    Clayborn is a better fit than Cameron Jordan, who played in a 3-4 at Cal. Clayborn is one tough SOB and a fiery leader. Bucs got the right guy.
  • avatar

    I was genuinely surprised we didn't take any offensive linemen, especially not in the later rounds, but given the way the last two drafts panned out I have faith in the front office.
  • avatar

    I really liked this draft. After watching some videos, I do agree that Stocker does have better hands than given credit for and unlike Winslow who is a quick/tall receiver, Stocker seem like a bruiser down the middle. Bradford is a big back, but from what I saw he does have a little bit of a burst through the hole before he starts running people over (Though I wish Bradford's highlight reel wasn't almost entirely against Washington, because he does plow through Foster a couple times). I hope Clayborn and Bowers do pan out, and hope their medical issues don't hinder them in the intensity of the pros. Though there is one thing that I am disappointed with: Now I don't get to read PR's reports from mini camps and hear about how all these guys are doing because of this stupid lockout.
  • avatar

    My only reservations are that we should have come away with at least one Offensive lineman and maybe one more Linebacker. But overall, unless Bowers and Clayborn flop this looks like an amazing draft. Last yr we managed to get starters in almost every round, we may have come close to that in this draft as well.
  • avatar

    I agree with Pete Prisco of CBS Sports, among others, that the Bucs deserve an "A" overall for their draft. Now for some fun and I refer you to the PR Bucs 7-Round Mock Draft 4.0 Final. PR, I'm sad to say, did not get one single pick right. My wife picked Bowers, and she thinks that NFL players ought to use flags so those dear boys would'nt get hurt so much. Because you picked Akeem Dent to be the Bucs 7th round comp pick and he went in the 3rd to the Falcons, you leave me no choice but to take you deep and award the big one "F". I still love ya, so same time next year!
  • avatar

    I like our draft and our last piece to the puzzle should be to add Raiders' cornerback Nnamdi Asomugha. I also wouldn't mind seeing us add a veteran Olineman and LB. Great drafting the last few years. Now lets put this team over the top by spending some money on a few free agents.
  • avatar

    Oh yeah... would have taken Jordan over Clayborn all day. I guess we really had a problem with our run defense. this guy is pretty good at both run defense and rushing the qb, but not EXCELLENT at either.
  • avatar

    I also though we should have grabbed Romeus. Just in case Bowers' knee craps out. I do think the Hardy pick was good, if he developes a little. Black was a lock to be on the bucs. Wasn't sure about the Gaitor pick though. I prefur big conference players. Biggers is more of a fluke than the norm for corners. I love the Foster pick, but also wish we would have taken another LB. Was sad that we opted not to take Alex Wujciak. I watched the film on him and he is a beast. A bona-fide thumper. Sheds all kinds of blocks and looks to be a better run stopper than Foster (based on youtube film alone of course). All in all, Super psyched about the draft. GO BUCS!
  • avatar

    Agree with all the grades except would give the Clayborn pick an A and the Gaitor pick a B. As for Hardy I think there were a couple receiving TE's available there with higher upside, but I can't quibble with such a small difference. As for Black I don't care what his 40 time was. A guy who gets 13 INT's in the SEC along with 3 defensive TD's, some forced fumbles and blocked kicks is an athlete plain and simple. His anticipation is so incredibly good that he gets a 2/10 second jump on your typical safety. That puts his real-world 40 in game situations at something closer to 4.5. With Bradford I'm gonna make a prediction that he becomes the second RB in the rotation behind Blount right away. He is an incredible athlete for his size and will surprise many people with how dynamic and productive a runner he is. As for the overall picture, I think this draft puts us over the playoff hump, even if we do nothing at all in FA. But if we add one or two key FA's I think we certainly make it past the first round of the playoffs (barring key injuries of course).
  • avatar

    I gotta agree for the most part. PR may not be real excited about Clayborn but the way I see it, having essentially 4 first round picks on our defensive line is not only crazy awesome, but I see these guys feeding off of each other and playing with nonstop energy every game making each other better and competing for sacks!!!!!
  • avatar

    I have a song in my head. "I love big backs and I cannot lie!"
Only registered users can write comments!
  • Blog

  • Articles

  • Around the Web

more RSS feed
moreRSS feed


View Magazine Front
Buccaneers’ Top 10 Players In 2013 Buccaneers’ Top 10 Players In 2013 As the 2013 season is nearing its conclusion, PewterReport.com ranks the Top 10 Buccaneers playing their best football down the stretch.
Missed an Issue? Archive
View Magazine Front


Should the Bucs sign Richie Incognito?

Pewter Report: Your source for inside and breaking news on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Hide Tools Show Tools