Post count: 1169

Basic logic causes most gun arguments to completely disintegrate.

Here’s another one.

Even if you buy the self-defense myth, anyone carrying a handgun in the Boulder grocery store would be at an immediate disadvantage. Even a police officer called because he possessed an equal firearm was at a disadvantage and he was killed (supposedly based on reporting).

I understand that some of that is tactical, but it’s also just the flat out difference in fire power so for the bogus self-defense myth to be true in a country loaded with assault rifles everyone would have to be carrying a salt rifles instead of handguns

That’s even more dumb because the hypothetical “good guy with a gun” is not wearing a uniform. So any police officer entering the grocery store especially after one of their own was down and reports of an assault rifle, with obviously think to shoot any civilian holding an assault rifle. What’s next?