Post count: 1578

simple example- both the headline and the subhead are false


“Journalists, Learning They Spread a CIA Fraud About Russia, . . . Instantly Embrace a New One

1. “faud” is bullshit. Say it hasn’t been proven, but it was not an outright fraud and even the first story says “possible” and “potential” etc. This is why he has to got Maddow clips. She’s about as representative of the media as he is.


The most significant Trump-era alliance is between corporate outlets and security state agencies, whose evidence-free claims they unquestioningly disseminate.

1. “alliance” is bogus because it suggest common purpose asnd to that point helater suggested they “merged.” The merger stuff is really dumb:

“It is not an exaggeration to call it a merger: so much so that a parade of former security state officials from the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS and others was hired by these news outlets to deliver the news. The partnership was no longer clandestine but official, out in the open, and proud.”

the reason they media had so many “CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS ” was because Trump said they were all Deep State and ignore intelligence. In other worss, TRUMP MADE US INTELLIGENVCE THE STORR so of course the media is going to have US intel etc on

2. “evidence free” is total BS. There was $500K found by special ops and interviews with detainees. Say that it didn’t turn out to be true (yet), but “evidence free” is total bullshit and its because he’s pissed because the press shuns him as a loon


If the CIA leaked the story to keep us in Afghanistan, they must’ve have bene pissed at the result because the result is it was a story about TRUMP NEGLIGENCE. That’s why his story is loaded with quotes and links that are really about Trump’s negligence (ie not acting on the reports). There’s only ONE instance of the so-called cabal saying “we must stay in Afghanistan because of Russian Bounties and that one is a throw away line in a press release AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE NED TO DEAL WITH RUSSIAN AGRESSION.

— IN ONE OF THESE POSTS YOU SAY SOMEHTING LIKE IT (CIA LEAKED OT KEEP US IN AFGHANISTAN) SEESM PLAUSIBLE. Fair opinion to have but not backed up by that article. Thats why I keep saying it never gets past an editor