this doesnt matter much at this point, but its an example of two things:
1) the massive insecurity over TRUMP’S HANLDING THAT leads you guys to cling to this . . and
2) that you dont read very carefully.
A. its an “observational” study – from the second paragraph “The observational study, published by medRxiv,”
“an observational study draws inferences from a sample to a population where the independent variable is not under the control of the researcher”
B. Its not “cornavirus survival rates” the author INFERRED that is increased its a small (but important) subset. From the article – “the coronavirus survival rate by as much as nearly 200% if distributed at higher doses to ventilated patients with a severe version of the illness.”
C. Lastly, its dont say it did improve survival rates, its said IT COULD — the author is HYPOTHESIZING. From the article – “could increase the coronavirus survival rate by as much as nearly 200% if distributed at higher doses to ventilated patients with a severe version of the illness.
PewterReport.com prides itself on being the most complete, comprehensive news source covering the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and delivering inside scoop on the team found nowhere else.