Anonymous

Inactive
Post count: 9891

First of all, neither Talibnor Blount were "cut", they were TRADED.  Secondly, EVERONE seemed to be glad when Taliban was traded. More rhan a few on this board couldn't understand the Bucs not using him but finally came the conclusion that if Blount  WASN'T going to be used it was better to get something for him at least.  I was in that crowd.

Whether or not anyone here thought those were good moves at the time or not is completely irrelevant.  This isn't an "I could have done better" thread. It's a "lets look and see what was done wrong" thread, and both of those now look like wrong moves.  Talib was apparently recoverable with the right treatment and there was contribution to be had from Blount.

Lol

Please wait…