Post count: 3316

All our RBs are good receivers. We ignored a bunch of better players, ignored our needs, and we took a RB that adds nothing we didn't already have about 50 slots before he should have gone. Dumb pick. Ray Charles could see it.

Our rbs are good in the Schiano/Sullivan offense but are they fits in Tedfords? Tedford and Lovie don't seem to think so. Do we want players who don't fit our scheme over players who do? If you see a guy who fits your scheme and you think he's a difference maker then take him. It's L&Ls first go around here. Let's let them put something together first and then we can judge it. As if we have any other choice or say in the matter.

Yup.Sims is the new 3rd down back but he will split time with Martin or Tedford will design plays with both of them on the field.

IMHO, a high 3rd rounder for a situational player on a team coming off of a 4-12 campaign does not make much sense to me.  You need a full time starter at that position.  Again, only IMHO. 

Please wait…