Re: Re: SR’s FAB 5:LAST YEAR A “FIASCO” FOR BANKS, VERNER;WHY COULDN’T BUCS STOP SLANTS?

#468333
Anonymous
Inactive

Quick note. there were a lot more then "a few" and some, like chevaliar, were extremely vocal and abusive in their defense of him.  We still have posters today crying how Lovie built the 10th ranked NFL defense and should have been given more time.  It really is a sad joke.In the article, there is a point that was commented on that I think was a VERY big reason why the defense didn't work.  Not only were there three secondary groups, corners, nickle and safeties, but each group had their own meetings and they did not meet as a whole group. If the CB is supposed to have inside help from the safety, it would be wise if they were both on the same page and looking at the same film, coming to the same conclusions, at the same time.  Especially if its true (and no reason to believe its not) that each of the secondary coaches taught the "scheme" differently.  Its common sense really.  I think it's pretty clear, yeah the scheme sucked, but the coaching and how the scheme was being taught to the players was the real culprit.

marinate on that for a second.....

0
0
No votes yet.
Please wait...