Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 8 reply threads

  • Author

    Posts

    • CalicoJack55

      Participant
      Post count: 8516

      http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/judge-dismisses-part-of-jameis-winstons-countersuit-against-accuser/2245664

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 9891

      In before Runole?

      Please wait…

    • vlagatta

      Member
      Post count: 2638

      not a great week to be a bucs fan…….. enough already

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 9891

      not a great week to be a bucs fan........ enough already

      Bucs fans are also fans of Winston's suit? Lol, we're 0-2?Man, really rough week for Runole

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 318

       The Court cannot recall ever seeing such a remarkable and improper introduction to an answer. Structurally and legally, it is not a part of Mr. Winston’s answer and it has no place in his pleading.” Uh oh. Sounds pretty amateurish.

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 11045

      “Winston’s statement restated his arguments and accused Kinsman of a “vile scheme.”Now I know who wrote Winston's argument.

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 10626

      The counter suit was just a PR move IMO. So not surprised by this. After getting pummeled in the media for so long, they just wanted to throw a left jab her way.

      Please wait…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 9891

      "Winston's statement restated his arguments and accused Kinsman of a "vile scheme."Now I know who wrote Winston's argument.

      You just know the words seedy underbelly were in there somewhere

      Please wait…

    • aBuc727

      Participant
      Post count: 41

      The Court cannot recall ever seeing such a remarkable and improper introduction to an answer. Structurally and legally, it is not a part of Mr. Winston's answer and it has no place in his pleading." Uh oh. Sounds pretty amateurish.

      Nah, his slime ball lawyer knew exactly what he was doing. Still nice to see the judge slap him around a bit. This is the same sleaze ball who "accidentally" forgot to redact Kinsman's name when tweeting a document way back when nobody knew who she was. That's when she and her  family started receiving death threats from the wonderful FSU psychos. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/buccaneers/2015/09/15/jameis-winston-counterclaim-defamation/72324420/Conway denied a motion from Kinsman to dismiss Winston's claim of defamation, saying that his counterclaim is "inextricably intertwined" with Kinsman's complaint and therefore not barred by a two-year time limit for defamation claims.Conway also struck two affirmative defenses offered by Winston and a preliminary statement entered in that May filing. Over more than 16 pages, Winston's attorneys offered a narrative of his view of the case that asserted the sexual encounter was consensual and repeatedly accused Kinsman of lying."The unnumbered 16 1/2 page "Preliminary Statement" that precedes Mr. Winston's actual answer to the complaint is an argumentative, free-flowing narrative that attacks Ms. Kinsman and her version of events," Conway wrote. "Frankly, it reads like a closing argument. It was obviously penned more for the consumption of the court of public opinion than for this Court and the other participants in this case. The Court cannot recall ever seeing such a remarkable and improper introduction to an answer. Structurally and legally, it is not part of Mr. Winston's answer and it has no place in his pleading."Winston's attorneys must now file an amended answer and counterclaim by Sept. 25.

      Please wait…

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.