May be fake news?

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 287 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1184704
    CalicoJack55
    Participant
    Understand what you just read here: Harris demanded to know from Barr if 
    Rosenstein had been cleared by the DOJ ethics department to be both a 
    witness in Mueller-report-related cases and the overseer of those cases.
    
    She fully anticipated Barr looking confused and either saying he had no 
    idea if Rosenstein’s dual role and the direct conflict of interest it 
    implied had ever been addressed by the DOJ ethics department or that he 
    would come out and say “no.”
    
    Barr answered–much to Senator Harris’ obvious surprise—that Rosenstein 
    had been cleared for this dual role when he was appointed.
    
    Of course, Harris misses the revelation here from Barr.
    
    Yes, I believe Rosenstein is going to be a key witness in more than a 
    few upcoming cases. Harris thinks that should disqualify Rosenstein 
    from making decisions while he was in charge of Special Counsel Mueller.
    
    Flustered at not getting the answer she obviously wanted, all Harris 
    could think to do was repeat the question several times, perhaps in 
    the hopes that Barr would change his answer. He did not. Multiple times 
    she asked him if Rosenstein’s dual role had ever been addressed by the 
    Department of Justice’s ethics department, and so multiple times Barr 
    told her that yes, the issue had been addressed and Rosenstein’s dual 
    role had been cleared by the DOJ Ethics Department at the time he was 
    appointed to the role of Deputy Attorney General.
    
    Here’s your key reminder: when was Rod Rosenstein appointed to head the 
    Mueller Special Counsel? When he was confirmed to the DAG job back on 
    April 25, 2017.  As Barr correctly notes, it was actually discussed on 
    the Senate floor at the time his nomination to the DAG post was being 
    debated that he would the person leading the Russia investigation if he 
    was confirmed to this post, which he was, by a vote of 94-6.
    
    The DOJ Ethics Department looked into the issue of Rosenstein both leading 
    the Russia investigation and appearing as a key witness in cases that sprang 
    from what ended up being the Mueller Special Counsel at the time he was 
    appointed to the job way back in April 2o17.
    
    Ponder the implications of that, because it’s clear that Senator Harris 
    did not.

    Source

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...

    #1184706
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    Mueller Investigation Investigation

    Would be interesting to see Julian Assange and Bill Binney as witnesses…

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184720
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184723
    AlecEiffel
    Participant

    Understand what you just read here: Harris demanded to know from Barr if
    Rosenstein had been cleared by the DOJ ethics department to be both a
    witness in Mueller-report-related cases and the overseer of those cases.

    She fully anticipated Barr looking confused and either saying he had no
    idea if Rosenstein’s dual role and the direct conflict of interest it
    implied had ever been addressed by the DOJ ethics department or that he
    would come out and say “no.”

    Barr answered–much to Senator Harris’ obvious surprise—that Rosenstein
    had been cleared for this dual role when he was appointed.

    Of course, Harris misses the revelation here from Barr.

    Yes, I believe Rosenstein is going to be a key witness in more than a
    few upcoming cases. Harris thinks that should disqualify Rosenstein
    from making decisions while he was in charge of Special Counsel Mueller.

    Flustered at not getting the answer she obviously wanted, all Harris
    could think to do was repeat the question several times, perhaps in
    the hopes that Barr would change his answer. He did not. Multiple times
    she asked him if Rosenstein’s dual role had ever been addressed by the
    Department of Justice’s ethics department, and so multiple times Barr
    told her that yes, the issue had been addressed and Rosenstein’s dual
    role had been cleared by the DOJ Ethics Department at the time he was
    appointed to the role of Deputy Attorney General.

    Here’s your key reminder: when was Rod Rosenstein appointed to head the
    Mueller Special Counsel? When he was confirmed to the DAG job back on
    April 25, 2017. As Barr correctly notes, it was actually discussed on
    the Senate floor at the time his nomination to the DAG post was being
    debated that he would the person leading the Russia investigation if he
    was confirmed to this post, which he was, by a vote of 94-6.

    The DOJ Ethics Department looked into the issue of Rosenstein both leading
    the Russia investigation and appearing as a key witness in cases that sprang
    from what ended up being the Mueller Special Counsel at the time he was
    appointed to the job way back in April 2o17.

    Ponder the implications of that, because it’s clear that Senator Harris
    did not.

    Source

    This is someone who does not know what he/she is talking about. Beauty of Q (and similar) is that the audience doesn’t know and so they take it all as insight lol

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184763
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184839
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184843
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184864
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184865
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184893
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1184908
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1185017
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    …and BINGO was his name-o…

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1185033
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1185109
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    #1185110
    CalicoJack55
    Participant

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 287 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.