I keep seeing players that opted out put in the first round and at the top of lists. Doesn’t that go against the love for football needed to be successful? I get there may be a case or two where a family member was highly at risk, or from an unorganized program, but don’t winners always bet on themselves? I think that only crap scouting departments will make those mistakes
You Inner Passion in Your Heart.Everyone -every person in this world has a Dream: a passion, a vision in
their life that pulls them and urges them to move forward in life. You, my friend have this vision within
you, it “whispers” to you occasionally, but in some cases it cries out. It cries out to be listened to and
acted upon because this vision comes from your soul.Find your inner fire, your sense of purpose; this fire
will help you harness strengths you’re not even aware you have. washington dc femal escort services Be connected with your inner passions –
your Life’s Dreams, and live that passion every day.
I don’t think they should be faulted for staying out. They don’t owe their teams anything. College football is a business. Those who are preparing for the NFL have to do what’s best for their careers. The only reason any NCAA teams played this season was financial. You can make a case that playing would have better prepared them for their career, but I don’t buy into the idea that they should have played to help their team or that they let down their team. Jamie Newman for example transferred to Georgia and never played a down. Did he owe Georgia anything? No he didn’t. But because of injury and opt out he has very little experience, and he’ll likely be on the inactive list every week in the pros. How will he ever be ready to play?
So in hindsight was it was a good decision for players to hold out? That’s a legitimate question. But do they deserve to be marked down for bailing out on their team? No.