Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 371 reply threads

  • Author

    Posts

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So he pretty much had a hand in every aspect of the Democratic Party collusion attempt to steal the 2016 election

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Perhaps the one BIG positive that could come from a Trump presidency

      http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454649/robert-mueller-team-investigate-the-investigators

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is a text message from Strzok right around the time the FBI had obtained the dossier:

      One of the most notable messages, from Aug. 15, 2016, came from Strzok.

      “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” said Strzok, possibly referring to then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

      Is the “it” the dossier? Trump wins the nomination in July and Steele, the author of the dossier is hired. Surely, the “it” is the dossier

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Yeah, and he was soley responsible for:
      1) Giving Huma and the others Immunity– then letting EVERYONE walk free,
      2) Changing the words to “extremely careless”,
      3) in the room during the Hillary interrogation,
      4), 5), 6), etc. ….

      So he either A) just “randomly” kept getting these important tasks, or, more likely B) was being rewarded by people WAY UP THE FOOD CHAIN for getting the desired outcome at each stage (collusion at the highest levels).

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Classic ethos deflection argument.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      I’m not sure what the problem here is ….. besides the fact that Strzok failed:

      I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,”

      We couldn’t take the risk and everything short of the taking of lives should have been done to keep that buffoon out of the Oval Office. Strozk is a true American and would have been an unsung hero if he was able to have completely accomplished his goal.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Because the direction of a democracy should be determined by the political views of law enforcement?

      Smh.

      Trump is such an awful President that people will ignore this story? Actually praise tg efforts of the FBI?

      America is broken

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 15, 17 at 7:40 am #1047859

      Because the direction of a democracy should be determined by the political views of law enforcement?

      Smh.

      Trump is such an awful President that people will ignore this story? Actually praise tg efforts of the FBI?

      America is broken

      This isn’t about “political views”. It’s about handing the country over to someone totally unfit, if nothing else by his maturity level, and whatever needed to be done, short of loss of life, was perfectly acceptable to me. America was broken but the pieces were swept up and dumped in the trash can with Twitler’s election. Hopefully someone electable runs, from either party, in 2020 that can pull the pieces out and put them back together again …

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      “Those who don’t accept the results of the Election are a threat to Democracy.”

      ^^^ the only true thing HRC has ever said

      Move to a different country, Col. Clink.
      This is America.
      We don’t allow corrupt tactics to win over The Will of the People.

      Trump 307
      Hillskank 223

      “SCOREBOARD.”

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      We don’t allow corrupt tactics to win over The Will of the People.

      Trump 307
      Hillskank 223

      “SCOREBOARD.”

      Don’t forget the other scoreboard…

      The one that shows someone else receiving nearly 3 million more votes. Perhaps you should take a closer look at your inbred brethren over in Alabama. How in the fuck does a state like that go blue? We’re you all too busy fucking your sisters or did your trucks get stuck in the mud on your way back from your weekly rally?

      Perhaps instead of spending all his time on the golf course, getting into twitter wars with BBB, sucking Bannon’s cock, and still acting like a pussy over getting blackballed by the NFL; he should take a closer look at what’s going on.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Unfortunately for Trump, the context of that quote could be interpreted in a number of ways.

      Unlike Trump’s divisive and moronic statements that are clear as day…

      Now we have Fox and friends et al trying to undermine the credibility of Mueller and the FBI because they are scared shitless of what they’ll find.

      This is Chron being scared.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 15, 17 at 10:19 am #1047875

      “Those who don’t accept the results of the Election are a threat to Democracy.”

      ^^^ the only true thing HRC has ever said

      Move to a different country, Col. Clink.
      This is America.
      We don’t allow corrupt tactics to win over The Will of the People.

      Trump 307
      Hillskank 223

      “SCOREBOARD.”

      Learn to read, assclown. I accept the results but I do fully support almost any action that would have kept that traitorous buffoon out of there … and it wasn’t the Will of the People, it was the Will of the Electoral College.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      No matter what you think of Trump the very point of democracy is that voters decide who is fit. Imagine that the candidate you support is undermined by LAW ENFORCEMENT.

      THIS IS THE UNITED STATES, not Liberia

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Klink – you are nothing more than the mirror image of Chron and your thoughts process – that you know best, to the point of subversion – is why people on Chron’s side were able to elect Trump

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is why Trump is such an unfortunate “outsider” to get elected President. His detractors hate him so much – and he’s given them plenty of ammo – that they’d actually brush off this grotesque conduct …. because the end justifies the means.

      America is broken because it’s citizens are broken.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Scoreboard, democrat party hoes.

      Such a Great Win! :-)

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      @TheChronicHotAir

      Scoreboard, democrat party hoes.

      Such a Great Win! 🙂

      See what’s going on in Alabama?

      That’s just the beginning, you sister fucking jackoff.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 15, 17 at 2:37 pm #1048014

      No matter what you think of Trump the very point of democracy is that voters decide who is fit.

      Good point ….. except we’re not a democracy and the voters didn’t decide. Whoever decided how to allocate electoral college votes decided.

      Imagine that the candidate you support is undermined by LAW ENFORCEMENT.

      THIS IS THE UNITED STATES, not Liberia

      I would hope if my candidate was as much a threat to THE UNITED STATES as Trump is and I was too stupid to see it, someone would have tried to undermine him.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 15, 17 at 2:45 pm #1048016

      America is broken because it’s citizens are broken.

      And they couldn’t have picked a worse person to try and mend it … Not sure how you can’t see that.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Klink – you’re a moron or dishonest?

      Just because we have an electoral college doesn’t mean we’re not a democracy

      You’re other comments don’t even merit a response except, perhaps, go get a tissue or a tampon or both.

      I have been bashing Trump on these boards. I am not a Trump fan but I am even less a fan of hyper-political fools like you and Chron. Same people, just opposite views

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      CK loves to ride the middle and create equivalency arguments. He’s just so smart and objective!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      If you think law enforcement should not undermine the democratic process you’re “smart and objective”?

      Setting the bar pretty low

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Col. Clinger.

      It’s deplorabble to say it’s OK for the FBI to create a fake dossier, and then take that dossier to FISA courts to get permission to spy/undermine your political opponent(s).

      100 X worse than Watergate!!

      Dem damn democraps!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Nah, you’re missing the point. It isn’t like I or Klink are in support of these type of acts… it shouldn’t happen. But what you’re doing is equivocating the countless ways Trump has broken the law, bent the law, abused his power, disenfranchised millions, lied to the people, and made us a mockery to the rest of the word with one guy doing one stupid thing that quite frankly (unless I’m missing something) doesn’t really mean much.

      • John Wilson

        Participant
        Post count: 149

        Schiano

        Please elaborate on Trumps broken laws, disenfranchisement, abuse of power, etc.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      You listen to too much CNN, MSNBC.

      All of America was told EVERY NIGHT for 7 months that “there is absolute evidence that Trump & Putin altered the election results”.

      The job of news is to report facts, not try to misinform gullible people to believe false stories/narratives.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Yet you watch Fox News, INFOWARS, Daily Caller, and a bunch of other trash that ACTUALLY creates fake news.

      The irony I’m sure is lost on you

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      @TheChronicHotAir

      is to report facts, not try to misinform gullible people to believe false stories/narratives.

      Trump’s twitter feed?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      The Stupidity of Liberals

    • Pewter Pirate

      Participant
      Post count: 1615

      Wow Crownless for the 1st time you and I are at 90% agreement.

      I don’t care if it’s Republicans or Democrats law enforcement should never ever determine elections in any shape form or fashion. Freedom is absolute regardless if I agree with a President on policy. If that is the case we are no better than Russia, China, Itan, Cuba, etc….

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      broken or bent laws:

      the emoluments clause: he cannot receive gifts from foreign governments.
      sexual assault: he’s admitted to grabbing women without consent
      fraud: Trump University
      wrongful influencing: tweeting to fire plays within the NFL

      disenfranchisement:

      Are you seriously needing me to explain this one to you?

      Abuse of power:
      Tax plan that will clearly favor him and his connections is probably a good, quick start.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Got it.

      NOTHINGBURGER.

      Excuse me while I go money launder pallets of cash to the enemy Iranians….

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Classic kkkchron response… void of intelligence and reason.

      How’s your pedo-boi Roy Moore doing these days? How’s that Trump tax plan doing for you? Feeling like the swamp is drained, right?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is beyond dumb and completely untrue:

      “But what you’re doing is equivocating the countless ways Trump has broken the law, bent the law, abused his power, disenfranchised millions, lied to the people, and made us a mockery to the rest of the word with one guy doing one stupid thing that quite frankly (unless I’m missing something) doesn’t really mean much.”

      To begin with, I think that word “equivocating” doesn’t mean what you think it does, lol, but putting that aside there’s no one COMPARING the two EXCEPT Klink and Schiano. The two are independent. The ends don’t justify the means.

      Secondly, the word “stupid” almost implies unintentional and it was not.

      Third, if you think LAW ENFORCEMENT interfering in the electoral process “doesn’t really mean much” then you’re either a moron or incredibly dishonest. Of course …. OF COURSE … we cannot have unelected law enforcement determine the outcome of a presidential race.

      Good lord, wake the fuck up. This was the FBI trying to sway the outcome of an election through a smear campaign. KKKChron is actually correct that this is potentially worse than Watergate, all the more terrifying that it’s getting so little play in the press

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      The press has been in strong collusion with the Left for several years– yet they try to “claim” Trump is against free press.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      You’re right, equivolate is what I meant to write.

      The rest is your usual superiority complex – as if you’re the only person that doesn’t want democracy undermined.

      From what I’ve read, this story amount to very little BUT I will cede that I haven’t gone in-depth. If you have a good read that outlines the severity of this issue without grossly exaggerating it I’d be happy to read it. Perhaps it would sway my opinion.

      Regardless, I interpret Chron (and your defense of Chron) as an attempt to undermine the CURRENT investigation into Trump’s dealing with Russia. Let us also not forgot the re-opened investigation into Clinton one week before the general election which certainly affected the outcome. These things happen on both sides. I watched Bush steal an election. Gerrymandering. Election rigging… plenty of shit happens so what is it about this dosier that is sets it above Watergate et al?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Wow, do you even watch the news?!

      The FBI had the dossier created (perhaps), so they could then take it to a FISA court as grounds for opening a spy investigation against a political foe.

      Dirty stuff.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      “George Washington’s Mount Vernon was a working plantation during his presidency, so did international tobacco sales to foreign governments or officials violate the Emoluments Clause? More recently, President Obama received royalty income from his books during his presidency. If the British government had decided to purchase a copy of The Audacity of Hope for every member of Parliament, would that have violated the Emoluments Clause?”

      “Thus the Supreme Court said in 1850 that an emolument included “every species of compensation or pecuniary profit derived from a discharge of the duties of the office.”
      Or in 1912: “[E]moluments are but expressions of value used to give complete recompense to a deserving officer.”
      And in 1920: “[A] sum collected by a clerk for a service not pertaining to his office….was not a fee or emolument.”

      I don’t think a tweet or stump speech represents an “official act” which the code violation you are referring to requires. It also states the act “based solely on partisan political interests”. This was clearly written to avoid “political discrimination” by forcing employers to discipline members of the opposite political party. So, I guess it would have to be proven that Trump knew the political affiliation of any Future protesters.

      Are you referring to the Billy Bush tapes? Talking smack with someone is hardly an admission of anything.

      Trump University is/was no different then any other real estate get rich quick “school”seen on tv for the last 30 years. There’s a sucker born every minute. But, this is also the thing that bothers me the most. I think it was definitely a bad decision to go into business with Sexton and Spitalny. I think Trump saw a way to make money by putting his name on a product and let the pepople in the seminar business run it…a big mistake.

      The benefits or consequences of the tax plan will not be felt until the dynamics have played out. One example is the effect of repatriation. The left leaning writers cite somewhat of a ridiculously low impact this will have. I don’t like what i’m seeing about the capital gains on the average investor. It’s a mixed bag inside of a complicated puzzle that also has the establishments finger prints all over it. Although history has shown “tax cuts for the rich” have been beneficial to the nation as a whole….JFK, Reagan.

      The way I see it, it’s the media behind the “disenfranchisement”. Why do you think Trump is a racist? Because he thinks US sovereignty benefits its citizens? Do you disagree? Because he said some of the border crossers are criminals? Do you disagree? It’s my belief that you think he’s racist because you have been told he’s racist.

      All of the “bad things “ Trump has done are chicken shit compared to what you, me and everyone else knows has gone on in DC for decades. None of his misteps would make the last page of any newspaper if he had (D) next to his name. To say or think otherwise is folly and you know it.

      Quite frankly, I don’t give a shit what Trump does or doesn’t do outside of cleaning the swamp. And quite frankly until the majority of Americans recognize that one priority, the shit argued about on boards like this are completely meaningless. So yeah, in case you were wondering, I voted for the outsider that was/is hated by both sides of the establishment and i’ll do it next time also.

      How do you criticize people that claim fake news when you’re on here talking shit about tweets, the emoluments clause nothingburger, your spoon fed racism claims, etc. How’s that Russia probe going….bullshit fake news. How about the criticism of Trump saying he electronically surveilled…..bullshit fake news. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor….bullshit from a bullshitter backed up by the media and fools all around. Those emails? They were about yoga!….fools. We were talking about grandchildren on that plane! Oh, OK say the fools. Bernie is a socialist and a millionaire. That’s weird…..well not really. I don’t think anyone in Castro’s regime worried about their next meal. Do you see any pattern here?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “I interpret .. . your defense of Chron . . . as an attempt to undermine the CURRENT investigation into Trump’s dealing with Russia.”

      wtf? that makes no sense. I am not defending Chron? And Why do you keep taking an independent story — FBI undermines election — and making it into some Machiavellian defense of Trump? I did not post “fire Mueller because his right hand guy is a lefty.” I posted that it should be unthinkable to have law enforcement undermine an election.

    • Pewter Pirate

      Participant
      Post count: 1615

      , if you think LAW ENFORCEMENT interfering in the electoral process “doesn’t really mean much” then you’re either a moron or incredibly dishonest. Of course …. OF COURSE … we cannot have unelected law enforcement determine the outcome of a presidential race.
      Good lord, wake the fuck up. This was the FBI trying to sway the outcome of an election through a smear campaign. KKKChron is actually correct that this is potentially worse than Watergate, all the more terrifying that it’s getting so little play in the press

      This above is spot on. I am just not surprised how little play it gets in the press. Unfotunately a lot of today’s press has the ends justifies the means mentality

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      “Quite frankly, I don’t give a shit what Trump does or doesn’t do outside of cleaning the swamp. And quite frankly until the majority of Americans recognize that one priority, the shit argued about on boards like this are completely meaningless. So yeah, in case you were wondering, I voted for the outsider that was/is hated by both sides of the establishment and i’ll do it next time also.”

      Ok so no point in talking to then.

      Again, this isn’t me condoning it. This is me failing to see the gravity of the situation. One FBI agent sent a text showing a clear bias. The fusion stuff is par for the course and more will come out soon. Don’t really see the big issue with using fusion to find out more information on an unknown political outsider that won’t even release his tax return.

      So you’ve got Strzok sending a text to his girlfriend about not wanting Trump elected. This is alarming but he was also booted off immediately by Mueller. What I’m saying is that one text doesn’t really mean much until we learn more. Could this be a big deal, wide-spread issue in the FBI? Sure… but all I see is people like Chron using this to undermine the eventual FACTS that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

      So… What am I missing CK? FBI is investigating Trump, this undermines the FBI. Seems clear as day to me. Fox News is already trying run this EXACTLY like I’m describing.

      It’s ironic that you’re worried about democracy but you’re ready to implode over a story with almost no evidence to show the gravity of it. So again… What am I missing? Are there facts I’m missing because until something else comes out to make this story stronger (which could happen) I’m just seeing you as a self-righteous chicken little.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      But I will give CK credit in that he’s rallied the right-wing banditos behind his need for anonymous message board popularity. Classic CK

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      I wouldn’t respond any further if I were you either.

      And there you go again claiming it as fact that Trump colluded with Russia….all because people, without any facts, told you Trump colluded with Russia…..but of course “this fusion stuff is par for the course”….”don’t really see the big deal using fusion to find out more information….”

      Find out more information!? How about paying a foreign agent to create false information? Is that collusion? Is that a problem in your narrow world view? Going by your method of “fact finding”, Jim Jordan posed the theory that the dossier was used to gain FISA warrants while questioning FBI Director Wray… He said it, so it must be true! This could be put to bed if Wray released the FISA application. Of course that hasn’t happened.

      What a joke. Don’t respond, I left the cash on the nightstand

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      this is feigned ignorance because it clashes with your world view:

      “One FBI agent sent a text showing a clear bias.”

      Multiple members of the FBI had a meeting RIGHT AFTER A CANDIDATE WAS NOMINATED BY HIS PARTY to discuss what they viewed as a “cannot happen” situation, which was THAT CANDIDATE being elected to office and they took steps to create a bogus dossier to discredit that candidate.

      OBVIOUSLY — and this is why posters like Schiano are dishonest tools — the issue is not the single text, its the circumstance.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      this nonseense was the EXACT point of my early post in this thread:

      “So… What am I missing CK? FBI is investigating Trump, this undermines the FBI. Seems clear as day to me. Fox News is already trying run this EXACTLY like I’m describing.”

      So what if it undermines the FBI? I couldnt care less about that. The point of the thread not the current investigation (except to you, as a deflection) its the past conduct, during the election. That is obvious, but yet you keep linking the two and “shooting the messenger” (which is funny for a turd who posts argument references all the time, lol)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      @CK – Post a link of that meeting… hadn’t heard that. That changes things.

      Your comments outline your confirmation bias. I said based on what I’ve seen I don’t see this being a huge deal. Tell me if there is something I’m missing (like the meeting)… yet you accuse me of being a “dishonest tool” while I’m asking for more context.

      You just need to be loved. Your Neanderthal entourage awaits your brilliance.

      @John – I’m not wasting another breath on you.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      Ok so we’ll all pretend the Neanderthal comment was meant for someone else….

      Until you at least start to recognize your hyprocricy, discussions with you are meaningless. A good place to start would be to (quietly, by yourself) go over my responses to your crime, disenfranchisement, fraud etc. post objectively. If, after some time to reflect, you can start to appreciate the attempts to railroad the President get back to me.

      There is a lot of banter about Trump’s policies vs establishment policies. Its mine and a great number of Americans view that as long as the DC corruption persists, it doesn’t matter which “side” puts forth a policy. It will inherently be constructed to benefit said establishment…and no one else.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      What makes you a Neanderthal is that you believe that Trump ISN’T the establishment. A N.Y. millionaire that inherited his father’s fortune is somehow an “outsider.”

      He hasn’t and will not “drain the swamp.” He didn’t even persue HRC like he said he would. His tax plan favors the rich; what a shock.

      So yeah, you’re an idiot for believing a word this guy says… but hey, he makes fun of women, Indians, war vets, mentally challenged, Muslims, Mexicans, and anyone that looks at him the wrong way so I guess he’s right up your ally!

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      It makes no sense to think he is establishment. A 70 year old billionaire just up and decides to spend a ton of his own money and agrees to get dragged through mud during the twilight of his life? A guy who has never been a politician. If he is establishment, why not stay behind the scenes and continue to be the media darling he became and “continue to spread his influence” and make back room deals. Wouldn’t he have a number of allies…you know like the republican establishment? An establishment president would clearly have that support. This last sentence alone pretty much makes your claim a non starter, fool.

      It’s good to see that you have comepletely disregarded my previous smack down of your foolish, regurgitated “facts”. It’s kinda cool how you are such a smart person that you have managed to go full circle and land back on ignorant.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      You’re defining establishment as simply republicans and democrats. Do you realize how idiotic that is? The whole problem with politicians is the abundance of nefarious influence.

      By your logic mayor Bloomberg isn’t establishment because he has a billion dollars. Trump is bought and paid for just like everyone else. He plays the pawns just like everyone else. He’s in it for himself just like everyone else. He stands to gain from all of this just like everyone else.

      I don’t know why I’m trying to explain this to you. You voted for and openly support a Donald fucking Trump. You clearly have no character or values.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      No, that is not how I define establishment. I guess when I said if Trump were part of the establishment he would have the support of the establishment republicans, that somehow confused you. Most people would have read the part where I said if he were establishment, he could have stayed out of politics and done the back room deals all while keeping his public image intact and then decided to not respond in the same mannner you did.

      Yes, Bloomberg is establishment. A lot of Wall Street is establishment, major banks, media, entertainment, large corporations. Anyone with power and influence can be part of the establishment. That is not the same as saying everyone with power and influence is part of the establishment.

      Trump’s name recognition is a huge part of his business success and/or failure. Hotels, condos, golf courses all rely on their good name and customer loyalty for success. Hospitality 101. So again, you think he made his name vulnerable to attack (which everyone knew was coming) and stayed the course to campaign and win the presidency all to help his business? A man at his age with everything he could possibly desire, except maybe more time for golf, decided to risk it without any desire to make a difference. Looking at it logically, making a difference is the only reason to risk it.

      You say Trump hasn’t and will not drain the swamp. At this point, that is a matter of opinion. I hope he does. You seem to hope he doesn’t just so you can say you were right. What is not a matter of opinion is the fact that Jeb, Clinton, Sanders and all the other candidates (except Gary Johnson who had zero chance of winning) would make absolutely no effort to drain the swamp.

      It’s also pretty impressive that you personally know every Trump voter has no character or values. Wow, you really are the man.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      @schiano

      You are a dishonest tool and frankly you’re not very good at covering that up. The “meeting” is discussed in the link I provided in my very first post in this thread. If that wasn’t easy enough, try Google?

      By the way, you keep using words and phrases like confirmation bias and “equivocating” and “ethos deflection argument.” Maybe spend less time trying to sounds smart and more time actually reading? Just a thought…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      CK- ut oh, looks like I’ve triggered you. Sorry you need to be loved on message board so much. You’re just so like… wow you just love democracy so much and like wow, so altruistic.

      Such a patriot!

      @John – more gibberish… You love Trump and everything he does is the best. Cool…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      As far as the “meeting” goes… according to your national review article (gee, let’s maybe find a neutral article) they met in someone’s office and there are a ton of assumptions as to who was in this “meeting.” Seems like a ton of speculation based on one agent’s text.

      Weak as fuck argument. So again, this isn’t much of anything other than one person showing a clear political bias and being removed from the investigation.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Schiano is a dilly dilly.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      From your article:

      “While more context is necessary to understand the meaning of the text and what transpired in the meeting in McCabe’s office, the message raises the possibility that top bureau officials were infecting investigations with their personal political views.”

      Could there be dirty language? Sure… but maybe I can just call this “locker room talk.” That seems to fly these days…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      @schiano

      More “shoot the messenger”. That’s really surprising coming from a guy arguing against a point for pages that he didn’t even understand. Lol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Lol! That’s hilarious! Here is a pro tip: if you want someone to read your article, don’t post one with a clear bias. I see “national review” and pass.

      Clearly the term “meeting” is grossly exaggerated. It could literally be two people just bitching about Trump, unrelated to the investigation. So much speculation from one person’s text message.

      The thing is with you CK is you care more about showing both sides of an argument and riding the fence on your views than the actual truth. You don’t strike me as a Trump supporter but in your mind playing devil’s advocate and/or “seeing both sides” makes you somehow more objective. It doesn’t. That’s a false equivalency bias.

      Your feathers are ruffled when I say that, so it seems to me that I’ve struck a nerve… good.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Lol. It’s good that you give yourself credit, I guess.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      For the reading-impaired (and intellectually dishonest):

      “Strzok referred to an alternative FBI “path” regarding Trump’s “unlikely” election that Page had proposed during a meeting they’d attended in “Andy’s office” — meaning deputy director Andrew McCabe, the bureau’s number-two official, second only to then-director James Comey.”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 18, 17 at 4:30 pm #1048453

      For the reading-impaired (and intellectually dishonest):

      “Strzok referred to an alternative FBI “path” regarding Trump’s “unlikely” election that Page had proposed during a meeting they’d attended in “Andy’s office” — meaning deputy director Andrew McCabe, the bureau’s number-two official, second only to then-director James Comey.”

      Just to clarify, you’re not saying that Page was the one proposing an alternative path in case Trump got elected, are you?

    • Pewter Pirate

      Participant
      Post count: 1615

      Participant
      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 18, 17 at 1:14 pm #1048377
      Schiano is a dilly dilly.

      That is just funny

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Does two people (or even 3), even being purely insidious, constitute the lack of integrity of the whole FBI?

      And very good CK, you outlined that two people met and that Andy had a conversation with Strzok. Unless there is another document that outlines some sort of diabolical plan all we have is speculation.

      You’re so deep in this argument you might just start arguing in favor of Trump on the whole… just to show two sides of course.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Is there a place to see the actual text as a whole? I think that would offer some much needed clarity.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Another right-wing hack:

      Ari Fleischer

      @AriFleischer
      I think the falsified rumor about Trump firing Mueller has gotten more MSM coverage than an actual text message between FBI agents, involving the Deputy FBI Director, discussing an “insurance policy” in case Trump wins.
      10:45 PM – Dec 17, 2017

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Schianoismyhero
      Dec 18, 17 at 8:26 pm #1048498

      Is there a place to see the actual text as a whole? I think that would offer some much needed clarity.

      CK posted it on the first page but it wasn’t in the link he had provided. Here’s the complete text also found in a Washington Post article:

      I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Obama ballwasher at the FBI, Andy McCabe, failed to show up at his scheduled testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee last week– and Monday, fellow scumbag Bruce Ohr blew off his scheduled testimony.

      Collusion between the FBI, DOJ, and the Democratic Party

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      I’m still trying to figure out how Strozk changed history …

      And the fact that one of the right wing assclowns down voted my post that just provided the actual text wording just shows how afraid of facts they are.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      yeah….private text messages between two FBI schmucks at telling each other that Trump sucks.

      75% of the planet knows that.

      Move on folks…nothing to see here

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      @havok904 – that’s what I’m saying… I just don’t see this as much. That text doesn’t really say much. Is there a response to it or any additional context that would give it more weight?

      I think the “path” refers to the electoral college. Not sure about the insurance policy part. Seems odd…

      So again CK, what is it you (in your own words) think is going on here?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Schianoismyhero
      Dec 19, 17 at 3:57 pm #1048875

      I think the “path” refers to the electoral college. Not sure about the insurance policy part. Seems odd…

      The WaPo article that was linked above for the content of the text presents another, non coup related nonsense, way it can be interpreted …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Lol. Ends justify means

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      CK is afraid to put it in his own words. How cute…

      Don’t worry, you’ve got the racist conspiracy theorists of this board rallying behind you. Those upvotes are important!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “Kill the messenger”

      Lol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Surrender noted

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Argue with a fool or you have surrendered.

      Got it. Lol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 1309

      @Shiano,
      I think it’s admirable that you go to battle against a handful of right wing lunatics here in the Cove. Not sure why you waste your breath, these folks are just not wired properly. I have found that these people are so heartless that only after something happens to them or someone in their family that they suddenly comprehend many of the basic issues and merits of programs. Nancy Reagan changed her tune about stem cell research only after the father of the deficit Ronny got sick. Dick Cheney now supports gay rights after his daughter announced she was a lesbian. I work with a right wing contractor who is now whining and concerned about losing his affordable health insurance.
      You are spot on when you speak of core values, anyone who steps into a voters booth and votes for a Republican is voting against common decency to our fellow men, women and children. The new tax plan is hell bent on undermining the affordable health care act and health insurance for children. But hey who cares huh? Kids don’t need health insurance. How about that Scott Pruitt fella, his job title is head of the Department of Environmental Protection, PROTECTION is in his job title. Has anyone noticed he has done nothing to actually protect our environment? I think under our current president the job title should be Department of Environmental Destruction. I guess when there are a few dollars to be made who gives a shit about clean air and water. I have no Republican friends for a reason, not interested in whatever values they think they have, the are certainly not mine.

    • Pewter Pirate

      Participant
      Post count: 1615

      Skipper

      Has anyone noticed he has done nothing to actually protect our environment?

      Not asking for you to prove global waming exists. Mostly all scientists agree with that. Where scientists disagree is whether global warming is casued by “man” or if it is “natural”.

      The premise of this is “man made” global warming versus “natural” global warming The earth has warmed. Please show me how the regulations that have been put in place by the EPA since the 1980s to stop “man made global warming has stopped global warming. Every year I am told by the left and media the global warming is getting worse and all of the polar bears are going to die. For 37 years the EPA has been fighting against “man made” global warming. Why does it keep getting worse? Why are the polar bears going to die? We have an EPA. Is it doing anything except passing regulations and wasting money that is not stopping “man made” global warming, because maybe just maybe global warming is “natural”, and cyclical has nothing to do with man?

      I know the above is difficult for people on the left to understand, because they have been conditioned to believe that the only way global warming occurs is because of man even though global warming has been cyclical since man started keeping tempartures. It is also hard for people on the left to swallow that maybe government cannot fix everything, and actually in the process of doing “good deeds” with regulation actually hurts people and does nothing for the environment. After 37 years the EPA has not made a dent in global warming. After 37 years maybe just maybe try something different, other than scaring the crap out of kids with the world is ending and polar bears are going to become extinct unless we have the EPA that has not done shit to slow or stop global warming. Good intentions don’t fix things, that is why they are intentions and not solutions. The EPA is a good intent idea that does not solve anything.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 1309

      You just reaffirmed my post in the lunacy of the Republican Party.

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      @Skipper

      Dec 21, 17 at 9:52 am #1049277
      You just reaffirmed my post in the lunacy of the Republican Party.

      Pfft…

      Who needs science? We’ll just pray to a fictional character and everything will be okay.

    • Kermit56

      Participant
      Post count: 344

      @ Skipper
      You may want to look up a good orthopedic in your Obamacare network (if there are still any good ones left participating). You are bound to at least sprain an ankle or two dismounting from such a high horse.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      the irony of this post is almost too much to take :

      Skipper
      Dec 21, 17 at 12:03 am #1049232
      @Shiano,
      I think it’s admirable that you go to battle against a handful of right wing lunatics here in the Cove. Not sure why you waste your breath, these folks are just not wired properly. I have found that these people are so heartless . . . … anyone who steps into a voters booth and votes for a Republican is voting against common decency to our fellow men, women and children. …. I have no Republican friends for a reason, not interested in whatever values they think they have, the are certainly not mine.

      Surely some “right wing lunatic” is going to come back an just trash Skipper for being a “crazy liberal” even though they are the ones who are “not wired properly.”

      lol

      • Anonymous

        Inactive
        Post count: 6698

        Such a classic post from CK.
        1.) All you do is take the other side ALL THE TIME. You don’t have an opinion. Your opinion is just being devil’s advocate.

        2.) You still haven’t articulated what it is, in your own words, think is going on behind that text. The reason you haven’t, is because you don’t have a fucking clue. Most of the time you’re just picking a stance from a hat.



        @skipper
        – I agree with most of what you said but there are plenty of well-spoken Conservatives that I’m friends with and where I live. We agree on a few things and we spark intelligent debate in the areas we disagree…

        You’re right in that this board is filled with the fringe right wingers… personally, I’m socially liberal and fiscally conservative but according to PP, Kkkchron, and a few other dolts I’m basically a communist.

        I appreciate the insight. Ignore Kermit’s post as it lacks any substance. He’s just looking for those sweet sweet right-wing upvotes. Kinda like CK. It gives them wood.

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      *grabbing extra butter for my popcorn*

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Barack Hussein Omar Akbar Obamastain might be getting in BIG trouble for destroying a 10 year investigation (drug running by Hezzbolah) so that his shitty Iran Deal wouldn’t be in jeopardy.

      Ya’ won’t see this REAL NEWS on CNN or MSNBC….

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Lol. Keep working on your big words Schiano.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Keep skirting the question with ethos attacks.

      Is ethos a big word now? Should I explain it to you?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      A month in the life of Schiano:

      1. Schiano posts something dumb
      2. CK points out it was dumb.
      3. Schiano’s feeling are hurt
      4. Schiano spends weeks posting ABOUT CK.

      lmao

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      You really can’t answer that one simple question can you? Damn… Must have really gotten under your skin.

      Merry Christmas

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Would you two knock it off! I’m still waiting for a response about how Strzok changed history. You know all this other stuff confuses Chron and he can’t focus.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Do some investigating, Col. Clinger.

      I’m not going to hold your hand and help you do internet searches.

      If you can’t find VERY DAMNING info on Strzok, McCabe, Orh, then you’re not trying…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Yeah Klink! Try Infowars, Breitbart, and Fox News and you’ll find “the truth” you idiot!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Everyone knows CNN and NBC are the truth

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 22, 17 at 7:22 pm #1049617

      Do some investigating, Col. Clinger.

      I’m not going to hold your hand and help you do internet searches.

      If you can’t find VERY DAMNING info on Strzok, McCabe, Orh, then you’re not trying…

      In other words, you got nothing on Strzok CHANGING HISTORY. The most DAMNING stuff that there’s actual evidence of is that he felt the same way about Donnie the Dolt that the majority of the Americans who voted did …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “The most DAMNING stuff that there’s actual evidence of is that he felt the same way about Donnie the Dolt that the majority of the Americans who voted did”

      ^^^^^denial

      even if that was true, law enforcement is obviously held to a different standard, right? I mean, his BOSS kicked him out right?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Private Clinger,

      Since you are either 1) too lazy, or 2) too stupid to actually “try”…

      Strzok singlehandedly changed the the FBI wording to “extremely careless” (vs. jail ensuring classification)…

      Strzok singlehandedly gave Huma, Cheryl Mills, & others IMMUNITY, in exchange for….. nothing!
      Immunity is a tool used for catching other fish– not for letting everyone walk!!

      Hillarskank should not have EVER been allowed to run for President.

      We’ll soon see (hopefully) what role he had in the Dossier.
      His cohart at the FBI, Andrew McCabe, looks to be taking the route of the IRS hag– retiring in the next 90 days so he can receive full retirement benefits and avoid testifying.

      There ya’ go, stupid, lazy Private Retard Klinger.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      That’s what KKKchron read at his circle jerk right-wing websites… how about something to substantiate those claims?

      CK meanwhile is seriously going off the deep end. It’s not even funny anymore. Seriously concerned for his well-being.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 22, 17 at 3:58 pm #1049566
      A month in the life of Schiano:

      1. Schiano posts something dumb
      2. CK points out it was dumb.
      3. Schiano’s feeling are hurt
      4. Schiano spends weeks posting ABOUT CK.

      lmao

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Chronucklehead, you still don’t get it. Unless you’re Marty McFly you can’t CHANGE history so your title is, as expected, as ridiculous as your posts. History has happened, there’s no changing it.

      Let’s assume though that your right wing lunatic driven theory about HC not being able to run because of what Strzok did came to pass. That would have been your worst nightmare because ANYBODY else the Dems put out there would have kicked your boy’s ass in the EC to go along with butt kicking he got in the popular vote.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      I’ll buy you skirt to go with your tapdancing…

    • DorianGray

      Participant
      Post count: 11

      As far as these investigations go — I want democratic heavy teams investigating republicans and republican heavy teams investigating Democrats. I think the partisanship is so strong among the hacks in DC we can’t trust anyone on the “same” team to do anything ethical

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “I want democratic heavy teams investigating republicans and republican heavy teams investigating Democrats. I think the partisanship is so strong among the hacks in DC we can’t trust anyone on the “same” team to do anything ethical”

      investigation are done by non-partisan law enforcement

      oh . . .um . . . never mind

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      “…investigations are done by non-partisan law enforcement

      oh . . .um . . . never mind.”

      _ _ _ _ _

      Just like the Supreme Court (actually, the whole court system).
      Since when should “JUSTICE” be seen thru the prism of Political Party first?
      So lame.

    • DorianGray

      Participant
      Post count: 11

      So anyone think the Mueller team is balanced?

      It’s clearly not.

      I’m quite happy with its composition.

      When it comes to trying any of their findings, that part clearly needs to be beyond doubt non partisan

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      MUELLER’S TEAM IS DIRTY AF!

      Strzok singlehandedly changed the the FBI wording to “extremely careless” (vs. jail ensuring classification)…

      Strzok singlehandedly gave Huma, Cheryl Mills, & others IMMUNITY, in exchange for….. nothing!
      Immunity is a tool used for catching other fish– not for letting everyone walk!!

      Hillarskank should not have EVER been allowed to run for President.

      We’ll soon see (hopefully) what role he had in the Dossier.
      His cohart at the FBI, Andrew McCabe, looks to be taking the route of the IRS hag– retiring in the next 90 days so he can receive full retirement benefits and avoid testifying.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Hillarskank should not have EVER been allowed to run for President.

      Which would have been the worst case scenario for the Clown-In-Chief. How are you so fucking dense as to not realize this?? Any Democrat running other than HRC and they’re in the WH by a landslide.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “Any Democrat running other than HRC and they’re in the WH by a landslide.”

      The Democrats put up a terrible candidate, no doubt.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So Cub Scout Klink,

      You say that Strzok and the other dirty FBI agents didn’t change history– but then you say that the dumbocraps would have won with another candidate.

      You got caught showing how stupid your 1st denial was, right drag Cub Scout?

      #assandeggonyourface

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 26, 17 at 7:18 pm #1050648

      So Cub Scout Klink,

      You say that Strzok and the other dirty FBI agents didn’t change history–

      Exactly …. because nobody can CHANGE something that’s already happened.

      but then you say that the dumbocraps would have won with another candidate.

      Absolutely ….. This is where you’re too fucking stupid to understand that those two statements aren’t mutually exclusive.

      Here I thought this whole thing of yours was just shtick but you really are this fucking stupid. I said the “dumbocraps” would have won with another candidate. I didn’t say that anything Strzok did

      In that context, everything ANYBODY does changes history, you simp. You can’t CHANGE what’s already happened

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Wow.

      You’re a backpeddling Cub Scout, Klunk.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Ah the era of “fake news.” We can just undermine everything now…

      media
      science
      FBI
      victims of sexual assault

      All fake. Nothing can be trusted… there was this dude named Hitler that pulled this shit too.

      The FBI is “tainted” because of one text that implies one meeting, that is just as likely a meeting to bitch about Trump as it is to abuse their power and limit his chances of winning the election.

      To me, this just shows that his supporters are scared of what they might find… then their whole narrative is flipped on it’s side. If there was nothing, kinda like the Obama Birther movement, then they would just lean into the accusations and give some transparency.

      The dude won’t even do what EVERY PRESIDENT over the last 100 years has done and release his tax returns. This dude does nothing but hide shit, lie, and spoon-feed his zombie-followers one-liners and zingers.

      An Idiocracy at its finest.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 26, 17 at 11:34 pm #1050720

      Wow.

      You’re a backpeddling Cub Scout, Klunk.

      LOL …. I’ve said from the beginning that Strzok didn’t CHANGE histoy and nothing I’ve said since then refutes that. You’re just too stupid to comprehend that … and it’s backpedaling, moron.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Cub Scout Klink in drag,

      “You’re stupid.”

      So if Strzok bends all the rules and keeps Hitlary in the race, enabling the United States to elect a Republican instead of a Democrat (think of ALL the changes Trump has made)…. you’re still going to claim that Strzok didn’t change history?!?

      Good luck with that, FullRetard Time-machine McFly…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      I am not even close to a Trump supporter so I don’t raise the FBI issue to deflect from anything. I raised it because it’s a serious issue.

      Also, Mueller was appointed to investigate alleged COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russia DURING THE CAMPAIGN (the liberal mindset being that Trump could not have won any other way). He may still uncover credible evidence of CAMPAIGN collusion but make no mistake about it …the early returns are not good. Even flipping the one guy caused a misplaced, one day firestorm in the press that quickly fizzled on anonymous reports of POST-ELECTION meetings only.

      The liberal mindset is strong and deluding because many with that view can’t conceive of possibility that they could be wrong. It leads them to believe that people who don’t think the same way are “wired wrong” rather than consider that they might have things wrong. Liberals who cannot believe their candidate could lose to Trump are behind a high stakes investigation that will either end with Trump burning at the stake or with Trump having a very powerful “exhibit A” to give to those who see Washington as broken

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is Isikoff, part of the liberal smart set. You can just taste his hope in this paragraph:

      “In just the last few weeks, his prosecutors have begun questioning Republican National Committee staffers about the party digital operation that worked with the Trump campaign to target voters in key swing states. They are seeking to determine if the joint effort was related to the activities of Russian trolls and bots aimed at influencing the American electorate, according to two of the sources.”

      The problem is the paragraph says nothing. It doesn’t even say “they” are investigating possible cooperation between Trump/RNC and Russians, it just says they are investigating ifbtye activities were “related.” Related? You mean the way the FBI’s investigation and a dossier are “related?”

      High stakes. The Clinton campaign pays for a dubious dossier created by a foreign spook so it can smear Trump and it’s dismissed as routine “opposition research.” Trump representatives agree to attend a meeting where a Russian suggested they might have dirt on Hillary Clinton and that is “treason”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Lol… CK doing his best Alex Jones “the problem with liberals” rant.

      What a fucking clown. Congrats on your precious upvotes!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Schiano – feeling still hurt and calling me a clown after comparing the Internet to Hitler.

      Poor kid. Classic Cove

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 27, 17 at 11:57 am #1050807

      So if Strzok bends all the rules and keeps Hitlary in the race, enabling the United States to elect a Republican instead of a Democrat (think of ALL the changes Trump has made)…. you’re still going to claim that Strzok didn’t change history?!?

      Absolutely. My question is what word are you having trouble grasping the meaning of, change or history.
      An even better question, though, would be if YOU believe what you just wrote, that Strzok changed history to the point that he allowed your hero buffoon to get elected, why would you start a thread trying to vilify him? You should be eternally grateful to him for “changing history” and singing his praises.

      You’re stupid.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “You’re stupid.”

      You are arguing with him for pages over the meaning of a word. ;-)

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Laughing Out Loud at the stupid thing called CubScout Klink!! LOL

      Strzok didn’t change history because he didn’t jump in a time machine?
      What a moron!! (flips off klinger then wipes a burger on him)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 27, 17 at 9:59 pm #1050961

      Strzok didn’t change history because he didn’t jump in a time machine?

      Sonuvabitch, you finally got it …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Dec 27, 17 at 9:54 pm #1050957

      “You’re stupid.”

      You are arguing with him for pages over the meaning of a word. 😉

      I’m stupid for arguing with him at all, much less over the meaning of a word …. two words actually.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Not agreeing with you—- mocking you.

      By your flawed definition, Lee Harvey Oswald didn’t change history.
      99.9% would disagree with your f’ed up definition, Klunk.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      I just realized that I might (sadly) have more respect for Chron because he at least takes a stance and stands behind his ideas and ideology.

      Unlike CK who rides the fence on every issue and pussyfoots around the debate. The ultimate yeah yeah when given the opportunity.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 28, 17 at 10:43 am #1051006

      Not agreeing with you—- mocking you.

      You should be thanking me because obviously when you started this thread you apparently didn’t have a fucking clue how Strzok supposedly may have “changed history” and looked like your usual buffoon self ….. You’re welcome.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Schiano, I am sorry I hurt your feelings.

      Does that help?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      CubScout Clink stated:
      “You should be thanking me because obviously when you started this thread you apparently didn’t have a fucking clue how Strzok supposedly may have “changed history”

      Page 1, retard… 4th post on thread, plain as day.

      Go sit in a corner son..

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Here’s that post, idiot:

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 14, 17 at 8:22 pm #1047823

      Yeah, and he was soley responsible for:
      1) Giving Huma and the others Immunity– then letting EVERYONE walk free,
      2) Changing the words to “extremely careless”,
      3) in the room during the Hillary interrogation,
      4), 5), 6), etc. ….

      So he either A) just “randomly” kept getting these important tasks, or, more likely B) was being rewarded by people WAY UP THE FOOD CHAIN for getting the desired outcome at each stage (collusion at the highest levels).

      Where in there did you say that what Strzok did supposedly allowed HRC to continue running, handing the election to Twitler? Here’s a hint: NOWHERE. Those things in your post didn’t “change history” by themselves, it was the supposed ramifications of allowing to keep HRC on the Dem side. You never mentioned that because you were too stupid to realize it until I pointed it out. You were too busy thinking the idiot won on his own merit. The Clown-In-Chief won the election, not by who voted for him but by who didn’t vote for HRC. Truthfully, Comey “changed history” more than Strzok with that last minute email investigation bullshit.

      Again, you’re welcome for articulating what you apparently couldn’t … the chair in the corner awaits your presence, critter.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      The thread is the perfect example of the dichotomy in the this country.

      Half of the people blindly love Trump and think he does no wrong.
      Half of us see through his arrogance, idiocy, and self-centered agenda.
      Then there is CK riding the fence in the middle to get his precious up-votes.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Gawd you’re stupid Klink…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Dec 28, 17 at 8:34 pm #1051139

      Gawd you’re stupid Klink…

      I knew when I posted that long paragraph it may have overtaxed you. Have someone read it and explain it to you. Next time you want to start a thread slamming a Democrap, get your shit together before doing so. I feel like kind of a traitor for finishing your work for you …… again, you’re welcome.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Gawd, you’re stupid, Clunk…

      …what a retard.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “The Clown-In-Chief won the election, not by who voted for him but by who didn’t vote for HRC. “

      The liberal mindset that drives the Russia investigation and that drives FBI agents to cross a bright line …is not far off from that comment.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      CK is turning into the Alex Jones of this board.

      I don’t like or support HRC even if she did win the popular vote by 3 million. Trump won fair and square for a variety of reasons. HRC was arrogant in her campaign and it bit her in the ass. Fuck her for giving us this circus. Don’t like her. Don’t support her. Investigate her just like Trump and let the results of that investigation speak for themselves.

      CK thinks he has it all figured out but he’s just a spineless, populous tool. He needs to be loved on an anonymous message board… sad

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Another day another cry of pain from Schiano?

      Shocking, I tell ya.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Another deflection. Show me where trickle down economics works

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      That’s your strawman. Need a tissue?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      How is that a straw man when you’re defending the tax bill? Do I need to explain to you what a straw man argument is, or will you just deflect with the whole big concepts/words argument?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      You need to explain to yourself that everything will be okay. No need to cry.

      I am for smaller government. Period. “Trickle down” is just a political phrase going back to Hoover

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      You’ve ascended to a new level of douche. Like most people you aren’t ACTUALLY small government, you just like to feel like a libertarian.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      A crying, name calling mind reader. Impressive. Glad to know what I really am!

      Thanks for your help

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      How… hypocritical of you.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Keep crying kid. Liberal ethos

      (See what I did there?)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Man, big words really insult you! Did big words pick on you in middle school? Did big words touch you in your no no place? We will show those big words whose boss.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So many felonies– all swept under the rug by those Obama scumbags at the top of the FBI and DOJ.

      #DemocratCollusion

      That’s why they are fighting so hard to take down Trump.

    • SackedBySapp

      Participant
      Post count: 155

      the combination is 13-6-12

      I’ll see you in time

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      wtf?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      LOCK THEM UP, then Hang a few of them?

      Hillbeansstrzokcomeyobam

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Democratic scum at the top of the FBI and DOJ need to be packing their belongings… big news coming!

      Tick tock tick tock…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Yup Trump will have to go under oath and testify.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      I wouldn’t expect a democrat to know what’s coming…

      #CNNisTrash
      #MSNBCisTrash

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Mueller’s sham investigation is dog turds

      FBI informs Congress they “lost” 5 months of texts between anti-Trumper Strzok and his anti-Trump FBI lover, Page.

      Also, FBI & DOJ already knew Hitlary was going to be declared innocent BEFORE the FBI interviewed her.

      #drain the swamp
      #hang the traitors

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      *picturing Chron’s comments muffled slightly out his pillow case Klan mask and attire… cousin in a headlock and tiki torch raised high*

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Still trying to figure out Chron’s problem with Strzok when the history he supposedly changed resulted in handing the election to Twitler …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Seriously… they re-opened the HRC investigation less than a week before the GE.

      Look at the downvotes, lolz. You can set your watch to it.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      You two must miss Chron

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Washington Examiner. Lol. The difference between you and me CK, is that I know the agenda when I see it.

      See what I did there?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Schiano — the difference between you and me is vast (I hope). ;-)

      The tweet references the list from the WE, but the point, which I assume you deflect intentionally, is 5 MONTHS OF MISSING TEXTS . . . and not just 5 months but five months of critical time.

      Think about that. Still looking, but I believe that means that the he FBI has texts before and after . . . but a “technical glitch” excised those texts in between the texts that would be most informative.

      Not even a touch if suspicion from you, Schiano? C’mon, be honest. Not even a “hmm, that seems odd.”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      It does seem odd… can you link something verifying the claim of intentional omission? The Washington Examiner isn’t going to cut it.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “can you link something verifying the claim of intentional omission?”

      If it was a verified claim the FBI would’ve been shut down already. lol.

      Its a fact. The FBI disclosed the fact in response to an investigation. For the time being, one is left to draw their own conclusion until its investigated further. That’s the context in which the fact is being discussed.

      I dont see the WE as a disinterested source, but neither do I see CNN as a disinterested source. So, the absence of reporting by CNN doesnt make the inference any less plausible, right? I am not sure there is a reasonable explanation for specifically excised texts with texts on both sides. Thats why I wonder if that is accurate.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      I’m gonna see if I can find it somewhere else… if it’s just the Examiner I can’t invest my faith into that syndicate. Sorry, they suck.

      Edit: PBS and CBS are reporting it. Very odd but again, it’s just one guy trying to cover his ass.

      If it’s something more, hopefully the corruption surfaces.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Oh and CNN is reporting it… will be interesting to see what happens.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      One guy trying to cover his ass? It’s the FBI. Texts on FBI phones that have gone missing

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      It’s an FBI phone?!? Well that does change things. I was under the assumption it was his personal phone.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Peter Strzok, a dude Robert dirty cop Mueller thought should be on his “impartial” investigation witch hunt, was informed of a hack to Hillary’s homebrew email account- but did nothing about it.

      #HangMueller&Strzok

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Mar 6, 18 at 12:27 pm #1065277

      Peter Strzok, a dude Robert dirty cop Mueller thought should be on his “impartial” investigation witch hunt, was informed of a hack to Hillary’s homebrew email account- but did nothing about it.

      Resulting in the handing of the election to Donnie. You should be thanking him instead of wanting to hang him…. It’s amazing you’re still this fucking clueless about this to keep bumping this thread.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink, I feel bad that I have to ask, but am starting to wonder. You really that deranged or just bored and trying to start shit?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “Resulting in the handing of the election to Donnie.”

      This is the liberal mindset. It couldn’t be that she didn’t win in merits, it had to be some kind of conspiracy. How about she sucked as an ESTABLISHMENT candidate in a year that was so anti-establishment they voted in Donnie. Hell, look no further than Bernie basically beating here.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 6, 18 at 7:28 pm #1065389

      “Resulting in the handing of the election to Donnie.”

      This is the liberal mindset. It couldn’t be that she didn’t win in merits, it had to be some kind of conspiracy. How about she sucked as an ESTABLISHMENT candidate in a year that was so anti-establishment they voted in Donnie. Hell, look no further than Bernie basically beating here.

      I know you love pulling this “liberal” mindset bullshit but where did I say it was a conspiracy that caused her to lose?
      I apparently wasn’t clear, or you’re as blinded as Chron. If Stzok “changed history” by protecting Hillary (which is what this lunatic’s thread is apparently about), thereby keeping her in the race, the election was basically handed to Donnie because if there was one candidate this year that Donnie had a chance of beating it was HRC …. and he did. Anyone else running against him and the male version of Honey Boo Boo is back to reality TV.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink you did sound like you were roaming at the mouth. If you were a dog I would have shot you thinking you had rabies.

      The FBI love team hated Trump. The Democratic primary system took the power out of the hands of the people by giving so many delegates to the states instead of the voters.

      Also the Democratic party, the two heads in particular, played dirty pool against poor Bernie.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Mar 7, 18 at 4:56 am #1065434

      Klink you did sound like you were roaming at the mouth. If you were a dog I would have shot you thinking you had rabies.

      But you’re cool with this ….

      TheChronicHotAir
      Mar 6, 18 at 12:27 pm #1065277

      Peter Strzok, a dude Robert dirty cop Mueller thought should be on his “impartial” investigation witch hunt, was informed of a hack to Hillary’s homebrew email account- but did nothing about it.

      #HangMueller&Strzok

      Are you familiar with the term double standard?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Klink with more liberal mindset. “Dont look at me, look at KKKChron”

      Klink, own your own shit.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 7, 18 at 10:00 am #1065482

      Klink with more liberal mindset. “Dont look at me, look at KKKChron”

      Klink, own your own shit.

      This is where your trying to be the middle of the road, I’m above all this stuff, Mr Cool shtick continues to impair your reading comprehension capabilities. Nowhere did I disown my own shit, I embrace my own shit. All I did was point out that if you’re going to look at me like that, how are you not looking at KKKChron like that?

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Schiano er I mean Klink. Grow the fuck up man. I don’t think I have responded him even once.

      Now if you are going to complain about Chronic making you look incompetent and whiney, then at least hit him for the rent on the space he has in your head,

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      @Doublenickel55

      Mar 7, 18 at 1:24 pm #1065566
      Schiano er I mean Klink. Grow the fuck up man. I don’t think I have responded him even once.

      Now if you are going to complain about Chronic making you look incompetent and whiney, then at least hit him for the rent on the space he has in your head,

      While it’s no surprise to anyone with an ounce of intelligence, his comments went way over your head.

      • doublenickel55

        Participant
        Post count: 984

        DH, I guess should be honored that you decided to address me directly instead of through an intermediary.

        Since apparently I am not at your level of intelligence, please explain how this went over my head. You may want to do it such a way that someone not of your elite intelligence may understand.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Disgraced, demoted, dirty scumbag FBI agent Andrew McCabe gets a $2 million pension if he is not FIRED by this weekend.

      Yesterday, the FBI’s internal watchdog group recommended that he be fired.

      Will Robert Mueller’s personal ____jobber McCabe get axed??

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      @Chronic

      Not sure why you insist on bumping up this thread. 12 pages and you still haven’t clarified how Strzok changed history …. but if it WAS keeping HRC in the race, why would you be upset about it and want to hang him?

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      TheChronicHotAir
      Mar 15, 18 at 2:11 pm #1068640
      Disgraced, demoted, dirty scumbag FBI agent Andrew McCabe gets a $2 million pension if he is not FIRED by this weekend.

      Yesterday, the FBI’s internal watchdog group recommended that he be fired.

      Will Robert Mueller’s personal ____jobber McCabe get axed??
      I doubt sessions fires him, but he should.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      LOL!! ANDREW MCCABE KICKED TO THE CURB.

      Go choke on Mueller’s _____!!

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      McCabe still is nowhere close to losing what Flynn did.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Not yet. :-)

      Did you see the Peter Strzok/Page texts about the Flynn judge who recused himself AFTER a guilty plea & and did not give a public reason…that the DOJ was trying to hide from Congress?? (just released yesterday)

      Their whole conversation is a how-to-get-in-big-trouble in a corrupt investigation. It’s beautiful!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      True Americans all …. The US version of Operation Valkyrie. Hopefully we don’t pay the same price they did for their failure.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      I am confused Klink. Are you saying that Trump should be politically assassinated?

      Or are you saying that you think it would be tragedy to punish the people that intentionally lie to undermine a duly elected POTUS, while bringing shame to the positions they held and organizations they were with?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Col. Klunk calling for the assassination of a sitting U.S. President??

      Wow.

      #Clinkhole-jumped-the-shark
      #someone tell Siri
      #someone tell Amazon Echo

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Col. Klink
      Mar 17, 18 at 10:32 am #1069367
      True Americans all …. The US version of Operation Valkyrie. Hopefully we don’t pay the same price they did for their failure.

      ##########

      Ends justify the means. People potentially undermining Presidency was a “noble deed” because President akin to Hitler.

      Classic. This mindset is why many people hate liberals. The belief that they alone have perfect knowledge, even to the point of undermining the law.

      The law exists to protect us from the Hitler-like President and people like Klink

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      Col. Klink
      Mar 17, 18 at 10:32 am #1069367
      Ends justify the means. People potentially undermining Presidency was a “noble deed” because President akin to Hitler.

      Thank you for at least being intelligent enough, unlike the previous 2 dolts, to understand that I wasn’t talking about assassinating anybody … Look, I completely understand your disdain but I am fully in the camp that there are extremely dire times when the end does indeed justify the means and that this is one just shows how strongly opposed I was/am to having that oaf as the figurehead for this country.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      So Kline you can’t complaint when Republicans take same approach with Obama. They are just as convicted in their views as you are so they would justify it the same way

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink, I sure hope that we don’t have to apologize for thinking your IQ is at least room temperature.

      I think you probably are, and that you intentionally ignored the word politically in front of the word assassinate.

      I admit I had to Google what jump the shark meant. If you had done that, you would have figured out what he was saying. Again, I figure you probably did.

      So I am realizing that your hatred for Trump is so strong that you think their is no problem with public officials breaking the law to undermine his presidency. You have proven that you are ethically challenged enough that you intentionally misrepresent what others are saying.

      Considering this, why should we not think that you will intentionally mislead us on other ways.

      I guarantee you that your disdain for Trump is no higher than mine for Obama. I never thought it would be a good thing for Government officials to scheme and lie to destroy his Presidency.

      That being said, what has happened since Trump has been elected. I know you have shown your self to be not only intellectually dishonest, but dishonest on this subject as whole. But do try to be intellectually honest in a response.

      Of course you could just call people who disagree with you as dolts instead and intentionally misrepresent what they say.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      I think what everyone is trying to say is:
      We forgive you for being a bitter democrat who’s lost all sense of reason.

      (someone should still talk to Siri, tho)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 18, 18 at 5:20 am #1069831

      So Kline you can’t complaint when Republicans take same approach with Obama. They are just as convicted in their views as you are so they would justify it the same way

      Obama’s been out of office for over a year so I’m not sure the relevance of your comparison …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Mar 18, 18 at 7:30 am #1069841

      Klink, I sure hope that we don’t have to apologize for thinking your IQ is at least room temperature.

      I think you probably are, and that you intentionally ignored the word politically in front of the word assassinate

      I didn’t intentionally ignore “politically” but after reading Dolt #1’s response. I did gloss over your post, saw “assassinate” but didn’t register the “politically” in front of it so I do apologize for lumping you in with the board knuckledragger in that regard …

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      @klink

      Pick the next Democrat President then. The point – and I am sure its NOT lost on you — is that you have ZERO ground to stand on when Republicans take the same approach, when they elevate there own opinions over Due Process.

      This mindset is a big part of the political problem in this country and the reason that everything swings to extreme. Use total control of Congress to ram Obamamacre through because the majority judgment is best, then Republicans take power and do what they can to unilaterally dismantle Obamacare. Only extreme or hard-line party candidates are electable in this climate and, eventually, you get a Trump elected because all those people that view themselves in the middle eventually say “enough is enough, you all suck.”

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      So I guess Klinc is deciding to use dolt #1, instead of explaining what has gone so horribly wrong this past year.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 19, 18 at 4:16 am #1070052

      @klink

      Pick the next Democrat President then. The point – and I am sure its NOT lost on you — is that you have ZERO ground to stand on when Republicans take the same approach, when they elevate there own opinions over Due Process.

      When I take the same approach to Republicans doing the same thing to next Democrat President, please feel free to throw it back in my face …. until then that’s a straw man argument. I think the only shots like that I’ve currently taken at Republicans on here is at the board Klan member who calls Obama racist names and wanted to hang him, among others …. but apparently you equivalate that to what I’m doing since you lump me in with him so knock yourself out.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klnk, CK did nothing to you. You done it all to yourself.a very good job at that.

      Of course I could be wrong. I will give you a chance to explain how comparing a failed assassination attempt to our current POTUS is normal. Then reiterating that you have no problem with agencies telling lies to destroy a duly elected POTUS.

      I think you even said true heroes.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Klink is unique because his judgment is perfect.

      Liberalism.

      Klink knows best

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      That s my problem I need to become a liberal. I cannot count high enough to express how often time has proven my judgement to be faulty.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 19, 18 at 6:45 pm #1070277

      Klink is unique because his judgment is perfect.

      Liberalism.

      Klink knows best

      Finally, someone gets it …

      • doublenickel55

        Participant
        Post count: 984

        Col. Klink
        Mar 19, 18 at 11:29 pm #1070357

        CrownlessKing
        Mar 19, 18 at 6:45 pm #1070277

        Klink is unique because his judgment is perfect.

        Liberalism.

        Klink knows best

        Finally, someone gets it …

        Now that’s the Klink I am used to seeing

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Mar 19, 18 at 7:45 pm #1070295

      That s my problem I need to become a liberal.

      No, you’re pretty much right where you belong ….

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Klink: “yeah I am a douche. I admit it”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      CrownlessKing
      Mar 20, 18 at 10:51 pm #1070603

      Klink: “yeah I am a douche. I admit it”

      If I’m a douche because I stand by my convictions and think having this country being run by someone with the maturity level of a 15 year old scares the shit out of me then douche and proud of it …

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Guess I am clueless. I thought it was Klink using self deprecating humor to lighten mood.

      I guess I was hoping that these were over the top statements made to show disdain, because I really didn’t want 5o believe that Klink thought we would be better having bureaucrats intentionally undermining an election because they didn’t like the results.

      That was scary to me. I guess I was clueless.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      I am thinking of changing my ID to Massengill …

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      When will the IG release his report?

      Can Congress vote to WATERBOARD MUELLER?
      (asking for a friend)

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Potential good news?!

      Apparently, a judge recently ordered Bob “dirty cop” Mueller to hand over ALL the evidence in the General Flynn case.
      Lit’l Bobbie has gotten in big trouble in the past for withholding evidence.

      The Judge proclaimed that HE will decide if evidence should be left out or not! :-)

      F Mueller

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Can Congress vote to HANG MUELLER?

      2/3rds majority??

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Are you asking for a friend?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Yes.

      Well played. :-)

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      11 criminal referrals forwarded today to the DOJ, FBI, Huber.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      TheChronicHotAir
      Apr 18, 18 at 9:48 pm #1076870
      11 criminal referrals forwarded today to the DOJ, FBI, Huber.

      ————————————————————————————————————————————————-
      ….it begins
      The IG is recommending charges for McCabe.

      The IG report concerning Hillary’s FBI “investigation” is expected next month.

      Comey will be on the hot seat.
      Speaking of Comey, have you all heard the interview about obstruction?
      Joan Jones WTOP-FM: “is the smashing of cell phones and destruction of thousands of emails by the Hillary campaign in 2016 obstruction of justice?”
      Comey’s Response: “now that’s a great question. That’s the first time i’ve been asked that.” OK, so you had to be asked? Or maybe (actually) you avoided that question at all costs. What a good little soldier you are! He then goes on and on about whether there was criminal intent. Ummm, the emails had been subpoenaed. So yeah, there was criminal intent!

      On a side note; he admits not being asked that question before. Oh but no, there is no evidence of the fake news narrative. Purposely burying stories and/or not asking the critical questions are as much a part of fake news as…..well, fake news.

      And now the DNC is suing Trump, Wikileaks and Russia!!?? Are you f*cking kidding with this shit? Mueller and Rosenstein are on record saying Trump is innocent….shocker. Not to mention that you seriously want to invite the opening up of more Wikileaks documents? Oh and let’s not forget these are the same people that stole the nomination from Bernie. I don’t know, maybe you lost because you didn’t even have the majority of your own party’s voters on your side. Idiots!

      It’s going to be an interesting and exciting year. This is just the beginning

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Nice post, John Wilson.

      New news in the last few days: Bruce Ohr, important t#Rd at DOJ (4 doors down from the Head), demoted.

      Also, dirty cop Mueller has until May 1st to decide what to do with General Flynn.
      Sentencing was 90 days ago, but it got delayed.
      I think there’s a chance dirty thug Mueller will DROP THE CHARGES and let him WALK, since shady details of case have come out out and even a deep state retard like Mueller might be afraid of obvious liability.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      I was upset about Flynn, especially when it came out the agents questioning him didn’t think he lied.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      Yeah I also think Flynn walks, as he should. It sucks that a good man got railroaded out of an important position.

      The last few days/weeks are really showing the complete lack of any evidence pointing to the allegations against POTUS. It is finally becoming more and more clear that the DNC/Clinton machine/establishment are involved in a classic episode of deflection. For those who chose to see it, the evidence has been there for a long time. But the boiling point is fast approaching and it didn’t play out as they anticipated.

      A lot of people have risked everything to perpetuate this false, completely fabricated narrative. Makes you wonder why such an all in effort. To say or think they were just doing their “patriotic duty” because Trump is just so dangerous is delusional. Before this fiasco of a narrative became mainstream, Trump was always a respected, well liked international business man. With how seemingly fast ISIS has been corralled, North Korea has turned around, the economy and jobs have improved and on and on it’s almost like the people in power before Trump weren’t really trying too hard to really fix things.
      You know just like most Americans have been scratching their head at the disfunction coming out of DC for decades. There has been an innate feeling among most people that common sense left the building a long time ago. You see things like McCain sitting around in Syria with known Al Qaeda leaders or was it a mayor or senator in Haiti that came out and said what complete thieves the Clinton machine is following their “aid” in the earthquake aftermath…..this list could go for pages and pages.

      Seems to me these people are extremely desperate to protect themselves. Go back and read Trumps inaugural address. He said he’s going to give the government back to us, the people. Could it be that is exactly what they are afraid of? Losing their gravy train and possible criminal prosecution is a pretty good motivator.

      The jury is still out on whether Trump can or will drain the swamp. But, he has forged ahead with his agenda thus far despite massive opposition from the msm, Hollywood, Democrats and Republicans. And you know what? So far his agenda has been working.

      So to all the Trump haters, I don’t expect or want you to be quit. But, how about getting beyond all of the BS impeachment and criminality talk and take a good hard look at those screaming the loudest?!

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Trump drain the swamp? Lmao.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      It’s as if some of you never leave your 3 alt-right Trump websites.

      Get out and get done fresh air. The works us very different then you describe

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      I will be the first to say that something was off about Flynn. I never felt comfortable with him.

      That being said, he did nothing to deserve the he’ll he was pit through. The sad part is he will never gain back what he lost.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      Until and unless arrests are made there is no proof. But to say there is no movement in the direction to clean up corruption is a bit myopic.

      Saudi purge
      North Korea
      Executive Order freezing assets
      Over 20,0000 sealed indictments
      Inspector General unteathered
      TPP
      Paris Climate Accord

      Back room deal corruption has clearly ruled the day in DC for decades. Hillary has clearly been a huge part of that. And again why the all out attack on Trump from all sides? Attacks that will soon prove to be the criminal downfall of many DC power players?

      BTW, I read and listen to all sides. Maybe I have a better filter than some. How sad for some to think a corrupt DC is the only DC we can have.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is draining the swamp?

      Saudi purge
      North Korea
      Executive Order freezing assets
      Over 20,0000 sealed indictments
      Inspector General unteathered
      TPP
      Paris Climate Accord

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      You realize Trump took $30 million from the NRA and then had a hilarious press op where he encouraged governors to not be afraid of the NRA only to later kowtow to the NRA after a private meeting with NRA leadership.

      It’s like all corruption is created equal but some is more equal than others. That’s why it’s a joke to read people like you guys posting about draining the swamp. You don’t want the swamp drained, you want the portions you disagree with drained. Lol

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Lol even here trying to make it about the evil NRA. and gun debate. CK,you may want to seek professional help.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Sorry to interrupt your Trumpfest, DN55.

      It’s an example. There are others. My point, which you ignore, is that people like you are actually hypocrites. You praise Trump for selectively draining the swamp.

      You’re just the other side of the coin.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Apr 23, 18 at 8:39 am #1077618

      Lol even here trying to make it about the evil NRA. and gun debate. CK,you may want to seek professional help.

      I guess that depends on what “draining the swamp” actually means to you. To many, idealists I might add, it meant getting rid of the special interest groups and their puppets in Washington DC, bringing in those that are truly for the people, not for some organization funding them. The NRA is a perfect example of a swamp denizen. Sorry that CK’s observation went over your head.

      The only consistent draining being done is through the revolving door of White House staff and appointees …

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      CrownlessKing
      Apr 23, 18 at 10:20 am #1077653
      Sorry to interrupt your Trumpfest, DN55.

      It’s an example. There are others. My point, which you ignore, is that people like you are actually hypocrites. You praise Trump for selectively draining the swamp.

      You’re just the other side of the coin.

      yet you choose the NRA. Dude that’s not normal. Not normal at all.

      As far as the 30 million given to Trump, I went ahead and looked that up.

      Here is what happened. The NRA independently spent,10m on pro trump ads and spent 20m on ant Hillary ads. That’s not exactly donating 30m to the trump campaign.

      Now this has nothing to do with Mueller what so ever. It has nothing to do with.

      Now if you can take time away from demonizing any person or group that doesn’t share your belief and conviction on Trump, find One time I made refers certain to draining the swamp.

      Then again, when it comes to gun control, you seem to go after someone’s character with the facts be damned.

      Do we need to take up a collection for you to get professional help? Its not normal and this obsession is not healthy.

      Now I will wait for your next attempt at character assassination.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink, I never made a comment about draining the swamp. In saying that, Trump raised far cewr campaign contributions. When if comes to,surface, the candidate legally cannot provide input, I don’t know for certain, but am pretty sure that the NRA, provides a very small portion to campaign ads when compared to the total campaign money spent.

      Yes I do understand that their is a wink and a nod to superpacs, but in reality Trump,could not have asked for the ads to be placed or not placed.

      The point I was making is this Miler BS has nothing to,do with 5 He ,RA nor guns. Yet CK manages to bring them in.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink, my stance is the same as before trump. You can call it drawing the swamp if you like. I don’t. Its latest make centralized Government smaller and give more power to the local government.

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      He was making a point and used a fairly simple example.

      How hard is that for you to grasp?

      Oh wait…forgot who I was addressing.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      DH, yes it is fairly simple. CK found a way to make an anti NRA statement in a thread to do nothing with guns.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      DN55, maybe you are the one that should seek help if you’re triggered so easily. I used the NRA example because it’s such a stark contrast to the notion that he is draining the swamp. You obviously realize that or else you would not have made that pitiful, Rubio-esque deflection about spending on ads versus direct contributions to a campaign. Lol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Doublenickel55
      Apr 23, 18 at 12:07 pm #1077689
      DH, yes it is fairly simple. CK found a way to make an anti NRA statement in a thread to do nothing with guns.

      ***

      By that standard, the other poster made a North Korea statement? Lmao

      Good lord.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      This is some funny stuff.

      DN55, I am trying to find the post where you lash out at John Wilson for raising an issue (Trump) not related to the subject of the thread (FBI agent)? It must be in here, right? ;-)

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Settle down CK. First, most people with obsession won’t admit the obsession. You are starting to go 20 different directions again.

      Someone shows you are wrong, instead of responding you claimbits a failed argument, nonsensensical, in this case Rubio-esque deflection. Either you don’t understand campaign finance, or you intentionally misled. Trump did not take 30m from the NRA. Its easy to just discount what was said. Business as usual. The point was not whether it was a ruevstatement, its your obsession to guns and the NRA. Again not normal and not healthy.

      Did the poster you referenced show an unhealthy obsession with north Korea in any other thread? See the difference? I doubt you will, as that would mean admitting the unhealthy obsession.

      Next, if I don’t denounce someone you disagree with, I must be what? Hate to,dissapount you but lots of people I,don’t law out at. I ,e Dr lashed at you until you showed an unhealthy obsession with gun control and started assassinating character.

      For the record, John Wilson does seem to be well read. You might learn something from him if you read what he wrote.

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      Lol.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Lol, Rubio made that same distinction without a difference. Your position (and Rubio’s) is like saying I support you if I give you money to deposit into your account but not if I pay your debt to a third-party. So, in other words, f—k off with that bullspit ;-)

      Here, this will really set you off:

      https://theintercept.com/2017/03/28/donald-trump-rewards-fossil-fuel-industry-by-signing-climate-denial-executive-order/

      Damn off topic link! Trigger warning! ;-)

      Blame John Wilson!

      DN55, thank for your concern. I really apprecuate it. ;-)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “CK, you have an unhealthy obsession with fossil fuels … and swamps”

      Lmao

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Congratuluations CK, you managed to bring up an argument that did not include bashing the NRA. I am proud of you!

      Now for the point you did bring up, is it possible that Trump acted on his belief system? At least a possibility?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      DN55, the funniest thing about this discussion is your repeated flaccid attempts to mock me or insult me. Lol. “Settled down CK” “Congrats CK”. Man, you’re really mean!

      Trump acting on his belief system? Anything is possible but …

      ““President Obama spoke for me and every American in his remarks in Newtown, Connecticut,” Trump tweeted the next day.”

      Oh no .., I did it again!! “Obsessed people don’t know ….”

      :-)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Apr 23, 18 at 11:21 am #1077673

      Klink, I never made a comment about draining the swamp.

      It was pretty obvious to everyone, well almost everyone, that CK was responding to Johnny’s farcical comments about Trump “draining the swamp” ….. and the important part of CK’s comments about Trump/NRA wasn’t the money, it was this:

      … had a hilarious press op where he encouraged governors to not be afraid of the NRA only to later kowtow to the NRA after a private meeting with NRA leadership.

      That is the perfect example of being mired neck high in the swamp, at least as far as I interpret the term …… Now maybe he’s reversed his stance again, which wouldn’t surprised me based on his flip flopping history, but couldn’t find anything.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Klink, I think I may have said this before, but I consider Trump a mixed bag.

      When he was on the apprentice, I thought he was an arrogant asshole.

      I am not afraid to admit he confuses me. I disagreed with President Obama, on most things, but that birther thing bothered me a bit. I hated W never standing up for himself, but wonder why Trumovhas to degrade people when he disagrees with them. Tromp is very arrogant in public, bit I understand he is humble and salt of the world in private. You see he confuses me.

      I like a lot of the things he has done. I like cutting regulations. I like changing the trade status. I like his stance on immigration. I like what he has done on taxes.

      I think much of what he says and does is hyperbole. I don’t think he is serious many of the times he talks. I do think he has some pretty messed up ideas as well.

      So I never bought intobemptying the swamp. I look past some of what I see as faults, as he is much better than the alternative.

      You probably won’t hear me say a while bunch of great things about trump, you probably will not hear me say a bunch of bad things either. You will hear me talk about some of the things I am,glad he has done or how much BS this investigation is.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      CrownlessKing
      Apr 23, 18 at 1:55 pm #1077716
      DN55, the funniest thing about this discussion is your repeated flaccid attempts to mock me or insult me. Lol. “Settled down CK” “Congrats CK”. Man, you’re really mean!

      Trump acting on his belief system? Anything is possible but …

      ““President Obama spoke for me and every American in his remarks in Newtown, Connecticut,” Trump tweeted the next day.”

      Oh no .., I did it again!! “Obsessed people don’t know ….”

      wbat is funny is that a person that any time a discussion comes up that disagrees with his view is a failed idea or nonsensical will complain about being mocked.

      I find it funny that a person that openly asks if a person is racist hates gays or cares nothing for the people shot has a deep,concern for feeling like he is being mocked.

      I am staying completely away from any thread that has to do with guns because you have made it impossible to discuss. You honestly do believe any decision other than yours does not make sense. You honestly think that if a person disagrees with you on banning a certain rifle does not care about the deaths. As such, its not worth having a conversation on that subject with you.

      When I point that out to you, it feels to you that I am mocking you.

      The sad part about it is, I did not have that feeling with you on any issue other than guns. I actually had some sort of respect for you, even when we disagreed.

      Then you go and start bringing up the gun issues in other threads. The responses I get back from you, I do not think are true responses.I feel like they are flaccid attempts to Mick or insult me.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      doublenickel55
      Apr 23, 18 at 4:00 pm #1077748

      Tromp is very arrogant in public, bit I understand he is humble and salt of the world in private. You see he confuses me.

      LOL …. Understand from whom?? Ru?

      • doublenickel55

        Participant
        Post count: 984

        Col. Klink
        Apr 23, 18 at 4:34 pm #1077763
        doublenickel55
        Apr 23, 18 at 4:00 pm #1077748

        Tromp is very arrogant in public, bit I understand he is humble and salt of the world in private. You see he confuses me.

        LOL …. Understand from whom?? Ru?

        i have read several places when on a construction site how he was one of the guys.

        I read a story about him looking up,a guy that helped fix a flat and paying off his mortgage.

        I remember asking,my wife why he couldn’t have the same humility when talking in public as he dead when talking about his dead brother.

        No one thing, but several things I read over the years. Some before he even considered running for POTUS.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      So DN55, I hurt your feelings by pointing out your arguments were FACTUALLY wrong?

      Maybe a message board is not really your thing. Just a thought …

      By the way, how’s that whole “most regulated industry” thing going? Care to admit that was a laughable claim?

      ;-)

      • doublenickel55

        Participant
        Post count: 984

        First no one likes being called a racist or that they hate gay people, of course unless they do. That didn’t bother me so much. I figured most people would see it for the race and gay bating it was, where you pissed me off was when you said sonething I took as I didn’t care about those kids who died. That sir, did not hurt my feelings . it pissed me the fuck off. I got over it because I realized that you are so overcome by emotion that you are acting on emotion. I figured it was best to just not discuss it with you, rather than discuss it with an unreasonable man, at least unreasonable on this issue.

        Now you see I could have fought back and said something to the affect of you didn’t care about the other 12k gun deaths because they were not so many at a time. I could have said you discounted finding out the why even though it could save thousands of lives a year rather than 100. I could have said you don’t care about the thousands of deaths committed without a gun.

        You see. I refrained from stating that because I knew it not to be true. I know you don’t think that. You are just so overcome by what is publicized in the news that this takes priority to you.

        And just because something doesn’t make sense to you, does not prove it false. I think our resources would be much better spent in other areas than banning a rifle. I think banning a rifle will be counter productive, as it will not solve the problem, but will keep us from looking elsewhere.

        The fact you are overcome by emotion, you decide to bring this in as an example in a non relevant thread,

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      DN55, you should at least own your shit. It’s not that it “feels” to me like you’re trying to mock me when you post stuff like “calm down” “obsessed” etc, it’s that you ARE TRYING YO MOCK
      ME. Lmao.

      It’s a wasted effort because I couldn’t care less then I do for your opinion of me. In fact, i think it’s funny that you seem to care so much what one poster types about your anonymous screen name.

      Look, almost by definition most defenses offered by gun people are very easy to destroy because they are not genuine and often times based on a fear that some might call irrational. You posted almost every gun defense that one sees, all because you don’t want more regulation. That’s fine, but so why raise all the other stuff that’s so easy to knock down an why top it off with the cherry of dumb (“most regulated industry”)?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      I am not overcome by emotion. That’s your conjured nonsense. I have been dealing with this issue for years, so many that it’s not really emotional, least of all talking on a football message board lol.

      Maybe it’s just that my posts make you “feel” that way. ;-)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Btw DN55, if you think I am emotional I would suggest you go back and look at the thread. My comment about the NRA was a response to John Wilson’s comment about draining the swamp. As you have posted yourself – IN THIS THREAD – you never mentioned draining the swamp. John Wilson did. My comment was a response to his comment, but look who chimes in right after me lol, with a comment about me, no less. It’s you, right?

      Pretty sure you’ve shattered all the glass in your home, but if you care read on from there. It’s you posting about me even with 2 or 3 other posters saying that I just raised an example (and a good one at that)

      Who is emotional?

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      CK, lets just say that I decided not respond to any gun posts because I was unwilling to discuss it with someone I saw as emotionally unhinged on the issue, and still do.

      This was in part because I had no intent on responding in kind. I said as much. Other than calling you a fucking asshole for saying what I took as I did not care about those kids and pointing out your emotional state on this issue, I have held true to this.

      Yet to prove how this was not the biggest thing on your mind, you point out Trump taking money from the NRA as an example. This is despite the fact that he could not have stopped the advertising if he wanted to. This is the one subject out probably hundreds you choose as an example.

      Yep I an certain you are emotionally detached.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Further proof you live in your own reality, I guess. You jumped into the middle of a conversation because of an example I used and because you’re apparently upset about a different discussion entirely …. and yet I am emotional. Lol.

      Um ….ok

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Get a room on another thread.

      This thread is about classless deep state lowlife democrat operatives who need to be thrown into prison, or worse.

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      Double nickel:
      Good call on the 30 million. Unsurprisingly, I see your point is lost.

      CrownlessKing
      Apr 23, 18 at 7:53 am #1077613
      This is draining the swamp?

      Saudi purge
      North Korea
      Executive Order freezing assets
      Over 20,0000 sealed indictments
      Inspector General unteathered
      TPP
      Paris Climate Accord

      ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

      I thought it was understood that draining the swamp is bigger than the USA. I guess that assumption was wrong.

      The money and influence distributed by the ousted Saudi prince is there for everyone to see. That has now ended.

      North Korea would consistently engage in its saber rattling. What was the response? Talking, concessions and aid. More saber rattling, more concessions and aid…
      Who controls the “aid”? Who audits the “aid”? Do you know what a slush fund is?
      What do you think changed all of a sudden?

      If you can’t make the connection between the rest of that list and corruption then there is no help for you.

      Have you seen the news from Armenia? Do you think it’s related? Do you think Iran will be soon to follow?

      You called me a hypocrite and also went from lmao at Trump draining the swamp to “selective draining”. That’s convenient. If you know corruption rules the day and think nothing can or will be done to change it, why do you continue discussing politics? What good does it do unless your discussions are in the “back rooms”? My discussions are based on there being a chance for change. Yours would seem to be based on nothing more than ego. And BTW, I have no delusions that you will give any thought to what I say outside of the mentioned ego boost you seemingly get from all of this. There are other that read this, including lurkers, that may actually do some research.

      Trump and his Generals are playing chess while your over in the corner screaming “king me, king me”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      No way! John Wilson agrees with the $30 million deflection!

      Shocking.

      I suppose you think Trumps position on guns is a consistent, moral position too?

      ;-)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      John Wilson, this is either deflecting or you can’t read:

      “If you know corruption rules the day and think nothing can or will be done to change it, why do you continue discussing politics”

      Of course, I didn’t say that. I sad that you and others like you are hypocrites when it comes to “draining the swamp” because your own guy has several big examples of swamp-like behavior that you ignore. You even tried to soft talk the $30 Miller in from the NRA even though Trumps position WAS “ban assault rifles” before the $30 million and now it’s NOT …even after a mass shooting with an AR!

      You’re just the flip side of the Democrats you skewer

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      So that’s your takeaway from all of that? Like I said previously, I guess my filter is better than some.

      Enjoy your ego stroking, goodbye.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      You can’t be a drain the swamp reformer if you’re like Trump. A drain the swamp reformer needs a mandate from voters. Trump has a small following and is about to preside over a near once in s lifetime midterm reversal. His ability to make real change is getting weaker not stronger, in part because of who he is.

      Lastly, the Trump admin deserves substantial credit for NK, but coming from you Trumpettes it’s smacks of the days when you said “look at the stock market” as an example of Trump’s economic success. That was obviously silly and premature so maybe you should wait until we actually see what NK agrees to before you start branding his policies as success?? Just a thought.

      Mexico pay for that wall yet?

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      John Wilson, your selective filter was precisely my point. Glad we agree on that

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Ok genius which part is deflection?

      Trump in no shape or form took 30M as CK stated. In no way shape or form.

      The NRA did spend 10m on pro Trump ads. The NRA spent 20M in anti Hillary ads.

      Aacording to Federal Law, the NRA is not allowed to communicate with trump on the ads. In no way is Trump campaign allowed to ask them to post the ads.

      Now I suppose Trump may have been able to publicly denounce the NRA and ask them not to in a public, but that is a far cry from Trump taking 30m not even close. To say that would be delusional.

      Oh my bad,I forgot who we were talking about here. Back to your scheduled programming.

      Please do note that John Wilson,wrote out a detailed post explaining both domestic and international policy. Yet CK chooses one thing to comment on hmmmm.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      From a January article (it’s worse for Trump now?):

      “Democrats have solidified their position in the November midterm elections in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, maintaining a 12-point lead among registered voters while improving to a wide 14-point advantage among likely voters in congressional preference.

      Democrats typically lose support in the shift to likely voters, given lower turnout among their stalwart groups. That’s not the case now: Among those most likely to vote, 54 percent support the Democratic candidate in their congressional district, compared to 40 percent for the Republican.”

      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-solidify-lead-midterm-elections-matchup-poll/story?id=52488582

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      CK, what happened during the Obama off presidential election years? The first in particular?

      What happened in the W off presidential election years? First in particular?

      What happened in the Clinton off presidential election years? First term in particular?

      What do you think may happen in the Trump first non presidential election?

      Hmmm let me see. He may lose the house but maintain the Senate.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      DN55,

      The irony of you trying to couch NRA spending on Trumps election in terms of a REGULATION!

      LMAO. You’re a freaking dishonest tool bag

      The NRA – within the confines of campaign finance laws, sure- spent $30 million to help get Trump elected. Only in the intellectually dishonest world of Trumpettes could you actually ignore that FACT and Trumps REVERSAL on assault rifles as mere unrelated events.

      You fugging hypocrites. Drain the swamp, my ass.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      DN55 to be a reformer you need support not alienation.

      Trump has Republicans leaving him (bill to protect Mueller) and never had Democrats and never had the majority of voters. He had a chance to win voters over as a President and he’s failed. In fact, he’s driven voters away, into the arms of all to eager Democrats. He’s even driven away part of his base with trade wars.

      He can’t even win a simple PR battle. He sent his wife to the Bush funeral and played golf. That is the move of a disinterested narcissist not a leader

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Trump suppporters in the Cove:

      Runole
      DN55
      One Truth
      Chronic

      That is majority politics, right?

      ;-)

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      CK, please give the definition of took.

      Please give the definition of hypocrite

      Please give the definition of delusional.

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Oh please also define trump supporter. Depending on your definition, I may or may not be.

      I think you may have left some people off the list too.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Nah, pretty accurate list.

      You claim to not be a lot of things.

      Who knows?

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      So no definition and no added names. I am certain you probably missed a couple.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Can Congress vote to HANG OBAMA for attempting to undermine a Presidential Election by using government agencies to commit illegal acts?

      #Obamagate

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Tick tock tick tock

      Rubbert Muuëller has until tomorrow (May 1st) to:

      1) sentence General Flynn
      2) delay sentencing again
      3) LET FLYNN WALK (quit pretending his sham investigation is relevant)

      #FreeFlynn

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      1) sentence General Flynn
      2) delay sentencing again
      3) LET FLYNN WAlk

      so he has until May 1st to do nothing? . . . got it

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Dirty agent Strzok beotchwalked out of the FBI building on June 15th (lost his security clearance). Still employed.

      Hope the reports of him turning into a songbird are true.

      #hangcomey&obama

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      You keep bumping this thread with your lie of a title, reinforcing your knucklehead status. I can only assume you relish the role.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Strzok appearing in a secret, closed door session before a Congressional hearing today. :-)

      # Hang Comey & Obama
      for
      Attempting to Undermine the 2016 Presidential Election

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Troubling thing about this is

      IF it was an attempt to prevent Russian interference in an election then you brief the Trump campaign. They didn’t so it has to make you wonder if they were trying to entrap th Trump campaign or at least create all this mess.

    • Runole

      Participant
      Post count: 2714

      Wow! You just opined that possibility? Have you been living under a rock?

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

      I want to know what’s up with the gummy-grin girl? OMG

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Runole
      Jun 27, 18 at 9:23 am #1090563
      Wow! You just opined that possibility?

      ####

      Um….huh? Where do you come up with that?

    • doublenickel55

      Participant
      Post count: 984

      Runole
      Jun 27, 18 at 9:23 am #1090563
      Wow! You just opined that possibility? Have you been living under a rock?

      CalicoJack55
      Jun 27, 18 at 9:40 am #1090568
      I want to know what’s up with the gummy-grin girl? OMG

      You have to give credit where credit is due. As far as I can tell, CK has been against this investigation. Mostly with Manafort, but other times as well,

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir
      Apr 30, 18 at 11:09 pm #1081425
      Tick tock tick tock

      Rubbert Muuëller has until tomorrow (May 1st) to:

      1) sentence General Flynn
      2) delay sentencing again
      3) LET FLYNN WALK (quit pretending his sham investigation is relevant)

      #FreeFlynn
      —–
      Flynn plead guilty.

      Take a seat and quit your mindless jabbering.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir
      Apr 23, 18 at 11:38 pm #1077857
      Can Congress vote to HANG OBAMA for attempting to undermine a Presidential Election by using government agencies to commit illegal acts?

      #Obamagate
      —–
      Nope. But they still shoot traitors

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Not if they are on the Retard (D) side.

      Hillary Clinton
      Barack Obama
      James Comey

      are all free to roam the land.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Is Chron using “retard” the equivalent of the n-word with AA?

      He uses it so much I’m starting to think it’s some southern, trash-rap or something…

      Can anyone confirm?

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      I thought that was what Chron and his sis nicknamed their offspring.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Robber Muüller (aka Nothingburger) has asked for a delay in the General Flynn sentencing for a 3rd time!

      WTF, Lockjaw?!
      “Obama, or get off the pot.”

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Even a dumb as you are, Chron, you must understand what the delay suggests, especially with no request for delay on two other targets.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      It could mean several things.

      Sure, tell me the Retarded Democrat perspective…

      BTW, congrats on FINALLY concluding that the FBI/DOJ “might” have made up the Russia/TrumpCollusion to frame him. (to anyone with a brain, that was obvious months ago)

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Yeah, dum dum couldn’t figure that out.
      (PeanutButterCrown)

      I’ve posted my thoughts on prior pages. Case is so compromised that he’s afraid to sentence– fearing post Trump decision massive lawsuit from Flynn’s camp.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “BTW, congrats on FINALLY concluding that the FBI/DOJ “might” have made up the Russia/TrumpCollusion to frame him. (to anyone with a brain, that was obvious months ago)“

      – thanks for confirming your feelings were hurt. Chronic, the fragile troll.

      Lmao

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

      Such a spineless backbone.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “Michael Cernovich is an American alt-right social media personality, writer, and conspiracy theorist.”

      ROFLMAO

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

      Crownless savors a nothingburger like he’s Mueller.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Fire away, dumbass.

      Let’s hear your sh#t…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Lol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

      Public Servant – Hot Rod Rosenstein!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKufs38L-cw

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      No way! YouTube!

      (from Alt-right sources?)

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      The Democratic Party of Retards says Peter Strzok is a hero who deserves a purple heart.

      More like “he deserves a purple #### in prison”.

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Ufologist

      Contactee

      ########

      Seek professional help

    • CalicoJackLV

      Participant
      Post count: 8518

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      CJ, do you think people ignore your links?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Does the FBI have only 12 employees?

      How the fudge does Strzok get put in charge of the 2 most important investigations of the year/decade??

      #Hang Comey & Obama for attempting to undermine the 2016 Presidential election

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Jul 15, 18 at 10:15 pm #1093725

      #Hang Comey & Obama for attempting to undermine the 2016 Presidential election

      Attempt? Comey DID undermine it, you numbskull …

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Oops, I forgot, there are dum dum Democrats here…I’ll need to explain (maybe with crayons).

      The crime is “attempting” to do it.
      (If someone tries to do it, but are unsuccessful, are they innocent? Of course not!)

      #KlinkFailAgain
      #WalkAway,Please

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Haldol

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Jul 15, 18 at 11:44 pm #1093740

      Oops, I forgot, there are dum dum Democrats here…I’ll need to explain (maybe with crayons).

      The crime is “attempting” to do it.
      (If someone tries to do it, but are unsuccessful, are they innocent? Of course not!)

      #KlinkFailAgain
      #WalkAway,Please

      But Comey was successful so why are you lumping him in with Obama ….. of course, your stupidity is in line with this thread with the lie for a title.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Nevermind. If you don’t know why Comey&Obama are BOTH guilty, then you haven’t been paying attention to current events.

      # HangComey&Obama

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      TheChronicHotAir
      Jul 16, 18 at 6:03 pm #1093843

      Nevermind. If you don’t know why Comey&Obama are BOTH guilty, then you haven’t been paying attention to current events.

      # HangComey&Obama

      Just sayin that Obama’s supposed failed attempt to undermine the election shouldn’t be lumped in with Comey’s successful attempt to undermine it.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Chron, yelling in circles.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Fidget-taz Peter Strzok, hero of the Retarded Left, fired for GROSS MISCONDUCT.

      Trump was right (again).
      Dirty af, corrupt Obama FBI/DOJ agents…

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      The Retarded Left just donated $250,000 to their glorious swamp hero (Strzok) in 1 day.

      # Hang&ChipperShredderComey

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      The Retarded Left just donated $250,000 to their glorious swamp hero (Strzok) in 1 day

      You’re actually too dumb to understand your own topic? Lol, only The Tweeter-in-Chief could manage to make this guy a “victim.”

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Thank you, Honest Abe Trump, for personally walking Strzok out the FBI building, and then literally, curbstomping him.

      # Curbstomp the Swamp

      :-)

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Haha. Trump made him a martyr

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Bruce Ohr, DOJ employee feeding fake info to the FBI, writing about his communication with fake dossier author, Christopher Steele.

      In one of Ohr’s handwritten notes listed as “Law enforcement Sensitive” from May 10, 2017, he writes “Call with Chris,” referencing Steele. He notes that Steele is “very concerned about Comey’s firing, afraid they will be exposed.”

      Steele:
      and was hoping that “important firewalls will hold” when Comey testified.

      In other words, retard Muëller‘s best friend (Comey) was providing cover for the whole operation.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      “In other words, retard Muëller‘s best friend (Comey) was providing cover for the whole operation.”

      Good puppet

      Trump speaks of the past, attacks the investigators, so you follow suit. Trump does that because he lied about Trump Tower and because all that has followed.

      None of you nitwits care though, more focus on lights out tonight. lol

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Too much CNN & MSNBC for you.

      Get educated, dum dum.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Yawn

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Dirty af, nothingburger Robber Muëller ignores the Biggest Scandal in U.S. history, and instead focuses on a 2005 tax fraud case from the Jar Jar Binks era.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir

      So he pretty much had a hand in every aspect of the Democratic Party collusion attempt to steal the 2016 election
      —–+
      So how did he arrange for
      Don Jr. to meet with Russians with the idea of getting dirt on HRC?

      Did he assist Jared Kushner in an attempt to establish illegal back channel communications with the Kremlin to a avoid using lawful communication lines?

      Did he help funnel money into the NRA from Russia to aid GOP candidates in 2016?

      Is he laundering money for Russian Oligarchs through Trump’s shitty resorts and condos?

      Did he tell Trump to pay off his hookers with campaign funds?

      Did he tell Trump to suck Putin’s nutsack in Helsinki?

      Did he tell Trump to gargle Kim’s balls in Singapore?

      I didn’t think so.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      All of that is fake news (somehow) by the MSM.

      Lolololol

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Clintons killed off another investigator, like their mentor Vlad Putin would do.
      Oh those dirty dems…

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      KKKron is unraveling before our eyes.

      Entertaining as hell!

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      You’re silly.

      And stupid.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Complete melt down by Chron.

      Here, this might help:

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So on top of everything else, we now find out that dirty af agent Peter Strzok was ALSO in charge of looking at the Anthony Weiner laptop that had Hillarskank’s emails.

       

      What, are there, like, only 3 or 4 people working at the FBI in the summertime??

       

      # HangComey

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      I can’t recall law enforcement effecting the outcome of any election.

      Local, state, and the Feds can only do that via voter suppression and gerrymandering.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      So how did how did a middle management type like Peter Strzok effect the election again?

      Was he the one that decided to reopen the email case three weeks before the election?

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir
      Clintons killed off another investigator, like their mentor Vlad Putin would do.
      Oh those dirty dems…
      —–
      She died from a seizure you dipshit.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      Cohen paid $50,000 to Russian Hackers.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      The real reason Trump hates McCain

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Yes, traitor McCain hand delivered the known fake dossier… that guaranteed chaos- with the help of retard media.

       

      “My heroes don’t get caught?” ~ Muëller

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir
      Yes, traitor McCain hand delivered the known fake dossier… that guaranteed chaos- with the help of retard media
      ——-
      I would much rather see the
      Russian Dossier on Trump

    • John Wilson

      Participant
      Post count: 149

      So there are really people out there still standing by the Dossier? Wow! Talk about cocoon! Sad, very sad.

      Looks like the same people that think no presidential candidate has ever gotten information from any foreign source before President Trump came along. Those same people think that is now, all of a sudden, illegal? Hint; the illegal part happens when money flows between players. Hint#2; follow the money of Clinton-Ohr-FusionGPS-Steele etc, etc…..that is, only if you’re truly concerned about the things you so loudly protest. If not, carry on. Better start preparing your “apology post” for when the facts become undeniable…..ya dummy.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      @JohnWilson

      A substantial amount of the information contained in the dossier has been confirmed.

      If you don’t know the difference between obtaining politcal data from a Washington based commercial research firm and a foreign adversary then you’re being willfully ignorant or you honestly don’t know what you’re talking about.

      Besides, that research was iniated by a Conservative anti-Trump anyway.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Peter Strzok: the king of deflection

       

      “I’m in charge of the Hillary fakeInvestigation. I’m gonna do everything I can to let her walk, and then I’m going to pretend Trump committed voting crimes with Russia.”

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      TheChronicHotAir
      Peter Strzok: the king of deflection

      “I’m in charge of the Hillary fakeInvestigation. I’m gonna do everything I can to let her walk, and then I’m going to pretend Trump committed voting crimes with Russia.”
      —-
      Go back to sleep.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      April 10, 2017: (former FBI Special Agent) Peter Strzok contacts (former FBI Attorney) Lisa Page to discuss a “media leak strategy.” Specifically, the text says: “I had literally just gone to find this phone to tell you I want to talk to you about media leak strategy with DOJ before you go.”

      – – – – –

      Obama-weaponized, dirty af FBI admitting they were(are) in full Trump takedown mode.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      24 pages and you still haven’t shown how Strzok changed history …………………… simp.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      I don’t have to “show” you anything.

       

      If you want to pretend that Horrible Acts of Sedition against the American people didn’t happen, go for it bro.

      You’re allowed to follow laughable russia collusion hoaxes…

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      I don’t have to “show” you anything.

      Cocoon

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 612

      I don’t have to “show” you anything.

      If you want to pretend that Horrible Acts of Sedition against the American people didn’t happen, go for it bro.

      You’re allowed to follow laughable russia collusion hoaxes…

      You CAN’T show me anything because you’re too stupid to grasp that Strzok DIDN’T change history and this whole thread was nonsensical from the get go. As far as a horrible act of sedition goes, and this is where CK vehemently disagrees with me, if there was ever a time where, IMO, an act of sedition was totally understandable, it would be one committed in the hopes of keeping that embarrassment to the vast majority of Americans out of the White House.

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

      The real reason Trump wants to debunk the Carter Page FISA warrants

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

    • Havok904

      Participant
      Post count: 13021

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So Muellerfaggot delayed Flynn’s sentencing 4 times- but now says he cooperated from the beginning, and is not going to get sentenced.

      Can Congress vote to to HangMueller?!

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Vanity Fair Summarizes All The Problems With The Mueller Investigation Trump Critics Don’t Want To Admit
      http://dlvr.it/QsxG96

       

       

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Handcuffs for Strzoksucker, McCabe, Comey, and later, Muëllerjackass…

      Of course, the DNC Propaganda Outlets (CNN, MSNBC) will not report their treasonous activities.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      “Muellerfaggot”.

      Wow, you really are a POS human being. 4 upvotes (2 from you I assume) so of course the MAGA cult is ok with that type of derogatory language in 2019. Typical…

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      It’s 2019– don’t assume that you know what I meant. There are 57 meanings of that word.

      ~Lock the FBI Dems up that were plotting a Coup Attempt, fg.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Sure thing you fucking bigot. Sure thing…

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Nobody called you anything drastic, dum dum, unless your name is Robber Mueller.

      Gosh, can you believe McCabe actually admitted some high level jackasses in the FBI/DOJ were plotting a Coup Attempt?! What do you think should happen to them??

       

       

    • Shelby T Mitchell

      Participant
      Post count: 62

      Really Democrats like him and others like Mueller get off on a free pass. While the GOP and Trump get scorned and indicted for a witch hunt. Except if they have evidence like they did on Cohen, Flynn, Manafort.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 6698

      Huh?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Handcuffs for Obama’s traitors.

       

      #HangScumbagObama for attempting to undermine the 2016 Presidential Election

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Tick tock tick tock

      Rubbert Muuëller has until tomorrow (May 1st) to:

      1) sentence General Flynn
      2) delay sentencing again
      3) LET FLYNN WALK (quit pretending his sham investigation is relevant)

      #FreeFlynn

      Muëllerpussy had nothing.
      I hope General Flynn SUES THE F##K out of Muëller&Co.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So, LoserStrzok was in charge of:

      1. Hillary sham investigation
      2. Trump Russia sham investigation
      3. breathing ‘life’ into a dead Flynn investigation- leading to framing and arrest.

      Anyone see a pattern here?

      And as previously pointed out… are there only 5 or 6 people that work at the FBI??
      1 scumbag doing 3 investigations for fellow scumbag, James f*head Comey
      .
      .
      .

      Hang, then chipper shredder Strzok & Comey

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Hang n Obama for Treason.

    • DonkeyHunter

      Spectator
      Post count: 13935

      Hang n Obama for Treason.

      How KKKron of you.

      Have you pitched in on your brother and nephew from Georgia’s go fund me page yet?

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Coup Attempts are greatly frowned upon.

      I would GLADLY pay a stimulus check to watch a Live hanging of (white) Obama “officials”.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      So how does POS Adam Schiff get total immunity for LYING about Trump/ Russia for 3 years??

      So sad.

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Great example, the bigger the Trump loon, the more you get basic facts wrong

      “ chiff get total immunity for LYING about Trump/ Russia for 3 years?”

      Call it Faux News syndrome.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      Hey dum dum #1.

      This thread also shows your comments before you got STUPID.

      You were correct in the 1st pages of this– and then you went FULL STUPID– and you can’t even discern basic facts now.

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      Awesome to watch KKKChron on total meltdown

      the actual documents exist, plenty of credible news reports . . none of them help KKKChron though so his source is the Instrgram of this Qanon Trumper

      bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahah

    • Anonymous

      Inactive
      Post count: 21932

      If you’re tethered to reality, your views change as the facts change.

      If youre detached from reality — you shape everything to your narrative and when there’s no credible information to do os, you go to YouTube and Instagram for other low brows who share the same views (if confirmation bias)

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

    • TheChronicHotAir

      Participant
      Post count: 6041

      The True Insurrectionists– fgtObama and all the people around him.

      Obama, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Biden, Clinton, Stzrok, McCabe, Mueller, Rosenstein, etc., etc….

Viewing 371 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.