Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 9 reply threads

  • Author

    Posts

    • jbear

      Participant
      Post count: 3929

    • jbear

      Participant
      Post count: 3929

      All I can say is do not piss this guy off. If nothing else it’s entertaining watching him take apart the media outlet he founded.

      The Chomsky bit is for Virgil because it’s one of his favorite points about Greenwald… that he might be crazy!

      “Among other things, that Post article features The Intercept’s ongoing attempt to depict me as mentally unwell in order to delegitimize my criticisms of their shabby journalism. It quotes the site’s editor-in-chief, Betsy Reed, as saying I have “lost [my] moral compass and grip on reality,” echoing The Intercept’s prior claim that mounting anger at their organization is being fueled not by widespread revulsion over their increasingly unethical and politicized journalism but rather by my “unbalanced tweets.” The Post also quotes Reed as claiming that I have “done a good job of torching [my] journalistic reputation”: liberal journalists, who only speak to and for one another, always believe that the primary if not sole metric of journalistic credibility is how popular one is among other liberal journalists. “He’s a huge bully,” she added.

      Depicting critics of liberal orthodoxies as mentally ill, rage-driven bullies, and shadows of their former selves, is a long-time tactic of guardians of establishment liberalism to expel dissidents from their in-group circles. A lengthy 2003 New Yorker smear job on Noam Chomsky headlined “The Devil’s Accountant” — at the time when he was a rare and vocal critic of post-9/11 U.S. foreign policy — described how Chomsky was once a credible voice but, sadly, has now “become increasingly alienated from the mainstream” because he “has no ideas to offer.” Chomsky’s “thinking has grown simplistic and rigid,” the author wrote. She quoted Christopher Hitchens as saying that while he once admired Chomsky’s stable ideology and noble commitment to principle, he is now going basically insane, describing his views of the war in Afghanistan as “the gleam of utter lunacy piercing through.”

      The article also claimed that while Chomsky’s criticisms of Israel have alienated his liberal following, it has caused him to become popular in far-right anti-Semitic circles. That article also described Chomsky as an angry bully, prone to outbursts of rage against female colleagues to the point of making them cry, being humorless, and in general just plagued by mental pathologies which accounts for his unwillingness to accept liberal pieties. Sound familiar?”

    • jbear

      Participant
      Post count: 3929

      “In 2018, I compiled many of those personality-driven and mental health smears that had been weaponized back then against Chomsky because, at the time, other liberal outlets — such as The New Yorker and New York Magazine — were already using the same mental health and personality-based themes to expel me from the precincts of liberal decency due to my rejection of their Russiagate conspiracy theories, which had turned into a virtual religion, including at The Intercept. Both of those long profiles were devoted to a central theme: I refused to accept what everyone who is sane and mentally healthy could see — that Trump had colluded with Russia and Putin exercised some sort of clandestine control over Trump — because I had rage-based trauma from childhood that I never resolved.

      In 2012 and in the years after I frequently described how the same mental health themes were weaponized by liberal establishmentarians against Julian Assange: an incessant focus on the WikiLeaks founder’s personality and alleged mental health pathologies to discredit his pioneering work. I’ve often noted that the reason the Nixon administration ordered a break-in of the office of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychoanalyst as a response to his disclosure of the Pentagon Papers was because depicting someone as psychologically unwell is the preferred method of power centers to distract attention away from valid critiques and to expel dissidents from their salons. The script which The Intercept and their liberal allies are using against me is an old, stale, and trite one.

      All of this, quite obviously, is an attempt to distract attention away from The Intercept’s serious journalistic sins. It is also designed to personalize the anger which their behavior validly provoked onto me, to conceal the fact that numerous journalists across the political spectrum — not just me — reacted with disgust at what they did and what they are still doing.”

    • KarmaPolice

      Participant
      Post count: 2481

    • KarmaPolice

      Participant
      Post count: 2481

      Lmao

    • jbear

      Participant
      Post count: 3929

      Are you satisfied?

    • KarmaPolice

      Participant
      Post count: 2481

      Are you satisfied?

      If I say yes do I get compassion?

      A Snickers?

    • jbear

      Participant
      Post count: 3929

      Are you satisfied?

      If I say yes do I get compassion?

      A Snickers?

      Possibly…. You do have permission to use your babysitting money to buy a Snickers bar. Hopefully that will help. But as for the compassion? We’ll have to see about that.

    • KarmaPolice

      Participant
      Post count: 2481

      Are you satisfied?

      If I say yes do I get compassion?

      A Snickers?

      Possibly…. You do have permission to use your babysitting money to buy a Snickers bar. Hopefully that will help. But as for the compassion? We’ll have to see about that.

      Yes!!!

    • FireLicht2020

      Participant
      Post count: 6165

      I’m not giving Greenwald clicks, sorry.

      Summarize your argument

Viewing 9 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.