The Mary Hart thing is just weird, but how about something like this?
Tell me again how defund the police is wrong when no one even bats an eye at a policeman in Oregon flashing a white power sign at a Proud Boy that he’s obviously chummy with. pic.twitter.com/3hPEcyM8nI
Officer cleared after appearing to flash white power sign at Oregon protest
A counter-protester to the Black Lives Matter rally had been seen patting the officer on the back after he flashed the “OK” hand signal.
“The Oregon State Police on Sunday cleared a trooper who appeared to make a white power symbol during a Black Lives Matter protest in Salem, Oregon, over the weekend.”
Note in the article that NBC declined ot show the video
You and the whole outraged crew are deranged lunatics. I can feel your butt hurting when you watch that cop ok the white bearded guy….. I probably ok’d someone this week.
what the heck is wrong with you anyway? There is no context here and could easily be innocent but the way you present this… and what I know of you I think it would never even cross your mind that it could be anything innocent but that really is the problem I have with you boiled down to a tee. This attitude is true for a multitude of like minded, woke snowflakes going around being bigots and assholes to countless people while wholeheartedly believing that they are fighting the bigots. That goes for the snowflakes who recorded this…. You can hear them commenting on it in the background. Just fucking hilarious.
Way to prove my point. An assault captured on camera. obviously drunk rednecks who surely do deserve to spend some time behind bars for assault but you’ve gone and taken a victim’s side of the story who clearly wants it to be some big racially motivated “lynching” because someone in his group claims to have heard someone say to get a noose when in the midst of a drunken confrontation having to do with property rights.
It seems that perhaps some of these white losers may have been under the impression that some of a large group of people were trespassing and being drunk and stupid, assaulted some poor guy. Would never condone anything like this even if they were trespassing thats bullshit no matter what color you are. You can’t assault people thats like a law or something which you damned well know. I take issue for the hundredth time with your sensationalism and knee jerk over reactions to all things woke.
Nothing on that video shows anything except drunk assholes assaulting someone and a bunch of people confronting them. Jesus how the hell would they lynch anyone with a bunch of people around who are on the guys side anyway. Why why why does this woke moment mean we all have to find racism in every single situation? Even when we do find racism why why why do we have to make someone saying something racist a worse crime than physically assaulting someone? What the heck.
Edit: Just watched this thing like 10 more times….. the fact that any rational human being would post this with the title that a black man is being lynched and then people like Verge would take it seriously as if thats what was actually happening is mind boggling beyond any words.
Of course it disturbed me but I could not hear any of the racist stuff claimed by the guy who was assaulted. I did however read his statement which is attached to the video and while it does sound horrifying it’s obviously one sided. Even then his statement only alleges that someone in his group heard one of them say to get a noose AFTER being confronted by a large group of the victims friends and a bunch of vague after the fact “revalations” like that he now knows that they were singling him out because he’s black or whatever and also some other people supposedly heard someone yell white power at someone else earlier. That’s not factual it’s just this guys current impression after getting assaulted by a bunch of assholes.
Do you not see that we could be going overboard with all this woke shit? Watching an assault on video is supposed to be disturbing, thats why assault is against the law. If you’re disturbed because someone labeled the video as a lynching then tada…. we have found your problem.
I really hope that helps you see things more clearly.
And sure you have no problem with the labeling of that video? And that’s my point.
Your woke asses are part of the problem and a big contributing factor to that is the antifa pushed idea that you are morally justified to do anything you want to a fascist. That means any dumb hick who has the gal to wear a hat with a confederate flag on it must be lynching a black guy if he assaults him and good riddance if he spends the rest of his life in jail over tackling some guy in the woods. After all someone was wearing one of those hats!
It means that certain people aren’t entitled to fair treatment because of what they believe or the color of their skin which is bigotry and hatred all wrapped up with a pretty social justice bow on top.
He’s more of that never-ending white supremacy being charged with the vaunted “Hate Crime”
Two San Francisco-area residents accused of painting over a “Black Lives Matter” mural are facing hate crime charges.
Nicole Anderson, 42, and David Nelson, 53, both of Martinez, were charged Tuesday with three misdemeanor counts, including a hate crime violation, the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office said in a statement.
The July 4 incident was captured on video that shows a woman splattering black paint on the yellow block letters on a downtown Martinez street and then using a roller to cover some of the letters in the mural, which was city approved.
Painting over something somebody painted on public street = hate crime = whackjobs
Bonkers! Please fire tell me you also think this is bonkers. Don’t you see how this woke moment has already gone too far and has the potential to get a lot worse. When this is ok we all lose. Hate crime my ass.
Well I do hate always ending up on the jerk’s side of these discussions but that’s just how I see it. Still I don’t think the victim is a liar as you were saying in one of your other posts. I just have a problem with the whole idea of a hate crime. The victim seems less worried about being assaulted than he is about whether someone said a certain word or wore a certain hat while or before he got assaulted. I have a problem with that. It’s especially problematic if certain elements are going to try to use these laws to enforce social justice. I have a really big problem with that.
Also in my view my defense of the assailants would not change if the men had swastikas tatooed on their faces. That said the violence and racist stuff probably could theoretically get ramped up to the point where I could at least understand the desire to charge for a hate crime even if I am against the principle but I find that these laws are currently used or threatened to be used in cases where the application could easily twist real justice into something else.
“ Both are charged with violation of civil rights; vandalism under $400; and possession of tools to commit vandalism or graffiti; which are all misdemeanors, according to the district attorney’s office.”
On almost every topic, any discussion requires first correcting stupidity lol
None of you read or comprehend and …. never mind
“ Unlike the criminal offense just described above under Penal Code 422.6 PC, Penal Code 422.7 PC is simply a penalty . . . specifically, an additional penalty that is imposed whenever you commit a California misdemeanor that is also a hate crime”
This thread is a great example of the lunacy of these conversations
Buggsy sees words “hate crime” and never reads the article to see it’s not the “vaunted Hate crime” is a misdemeanor CA penal code because the people vandalized property (not “that somebody painted on a Public Street, but that was approved by the city) and they did so, by their own words, because of race.
Not grasping any of that though the “vaunted Hate Crime” will become “it says the word ‘hate crime’”
No doubt from a person in FL who used to scream about States Rights 😂😂
In 2016 another citizen was charged and convicted under the same misdemeanor hate crime for spray painting “get out Chinese” or something similar. I guess race wasn’t part of his motivation?
To Schianos point, yes this stuff goes too far. SanFrancisco is not exactly representative of the US. It’s filled with liberals.
The absurd “outrage” here is just as much a joke. A freaking enhanced fine for vandalism in SanFrsn is not the “vaunted Hate Crime” that sends the faux-libertarians through the roof
By the way, Buggsy and JBear – 130,000 deaths and your boy DeSantis still hiding numbers
Guess that’s why we’re talking about a SanFran misdemeanor
I’ve read it, Mr. Cronkite. They are being charged with a Hate Crime, not sure how that’s even debatable. So which part are you contesting as moronic? Attempt to not do your patented double-talking, slimeball attorney horseshit and answer the very direct question.
Buggsy, I am not sure if I am giving you too much or too little credit for grammar lol
This is you now: “They are being charged with a Hate Crime.”
This was your first comment: “charged with thevaunted “Hate Crime”
“the” (singular, “a” generic)
“vaunted” (much talked about)
Also, as to you actually reading the article, this is how you characterized the event:
“Painting over something somebody painted on public street”
This is in the article:
“Martinez Mayor Rob Schroder said in a statement Tuesday that permission was granted to the group Martizians for Black Lives to paint the mural on July 2.”
So its no different than vandalizing one of the many approved murals in Tampa, not somebody painting over some random thing painted on the street.
Also, as to it being a hate crime, you left all of this out in your quote supporting “the vaunted Hate Crime” now “a hate crime”:
“The July 4 incident was captured on video . . .which had previously been shared on social media . . .”a man can be heard saying, “the narrative of police brutality, the narrative of oppression, the narrative of racism, it’s a lie” . . .. the man is wearing what appears to be a “Make America Great Again” hat and a shirt with the words Trump and “Four More Years.”
I posted the CA code above. Like every hate crime its an enhancement (an extra penalty)and in this case to a state MISDEMEANOR, its not what you “Libertarian” guys have been complaining about, which is “the vaunted” FEDERAL hate crime expanding government
(Incidentally, the reason hate crimes exists is, in part, for the public impact, which is relevant here because the “The July 4 incident was captured on video . ..which had previously been shared on social media.” IN other words, the MAGA painters did it for the PUBLIC impact so of course they are going to be charged with a hate crime. It’s two different entities MAKING A STATEMENT)
I have posted a couple times, in a couple different contexts, that in a democracy the group in power ignore the group out of power at its own peril because once the roles are reversed the backlash will go TOO FAR
There are city approved BLM murals because the death of black men at the hands of police has been ignored so long that a televised murder of a black man and incendiary commentary by a President leads to HISTORIC riots.
Trump continues so a couple of his MAGA deface then BLM mural, so of course the city charges them with a hate crime
This volleyball chaos is the direct result of the lack of leadership in the country. Trump doesn’t represent the country, he represents a tiny, alt-right segment of his party. That’s terrible.
Na, I’m actually asking for something that he is quoted as saying that is racist. I’m not interested in dog whistles, interpretations blah blah blah, if he says racist things so frequently as some people say, then it should be easy right?
This smacks of people talking about my white privilege. When I ask for an example they go on some meandering diatribe about if I have to ask blah blah blah, and then can’t provide a single example of my white privilege.
The guy might be a complete and utter dick, and if that is the reason why you dislike him, I’m good with it, but if you are going to lob racist grenades, then back them up please.
Spartan, you’re smart enough to know this is flawed:
“ it, but if you are going to lob racist grenades, then back them up please.”
Racists acts are not limited to words, right? So a quiet lyncher is not a racist? A government policy like apartheid is not racist unless the government says the black people are subhuman? When a can driver passes a black man on the road, it’s not racist unless he yells “f— you, nigger?”
Also, why did the KKK where hoods? Overt racists are actually uncommon right? You’re suggesting that every American left of the KKK is not racist?
On White privilege … you’re posting on the Internet. Much of urban Detroit doesn’t have Internet. You’re MUCH. Less likely to get pulled over or killed by a cop. I mean, pick almost any walk of life – housing, banking, poverty, health care, health … and your life as a White person is statistically better than a black person.
White privilege doesn’t mean you’re bad or white is bad, it means exactly what you are doing, which is denying an absolute fact, racism is real.
Jesus you are a freakin asshole. Misdemeanor or not I don’t think being charged with a hate crime is going to sit very well with employers or frankly anyone. What do you not understand? They painted over a mural…. how can it be called a hate crime? Would it be called a hate crime to rip out a white Jesus statue or paint over a pro Trump mural?
I don’t know, you are just not good at thinking objectively. You get in your little hole and see the world from your little porthole and thats it… no growth, no development of any kind. This is yet another example of the left run amok and you not being able to see it…. because you don’t want to see it, is your problem not ours.
You are exasperating….. the “Vaunted” hate crime… that’s what your hanging your hat on? Sheesh I guess you won because that word would only be used to imply that being charged with a hate crime was a big deal. Clearly it’s a misdemeanor so I’m sure being charged with a hate crime won’t hurt these people in any way more than being charged with jaywalking would.
I’m also sure that the self righteous San Francisco progressives who thought these laws were a good idea had no intention of making a hate crime a big deal.
Are you stupid or something? Again, you need to get out of your hole because this is just too much. And by the way this is your thread that you started with the OK racist cop nonsense. You’ve done nothing here but make a complete ass of yourself as usual.
This is one of your all time dumbest posts. It’s a hate crime…. which is not a big deal at all because it’s a misdemeanor, because the guy was wearing a Trump shirt while he painted over a mural and claimed racism is a lie.
And I still haven’t heard of any BLM protesters getting charged with hate crimes for dumping blood on white jesus or putting obscene graffiti on memorials for confederate soldiers. I wonder how you’d feel about a similar law being applied to those people?
It’s political. You posting that the guy looked like a Trumper as some sort of defense of the hate crime charge is yet another example of your complete lack of objectivity. Being a Trump supporter does not make all your actions worse than they would otherwise be…. again, what it’s called is politics. Your whole idea hinges on the obscene, inflamatory and hateful belief that you clearly hold that the President is an over racist and he and his supporters actively support racism. I know that you believe that but the fact that you cannot see how offensive that belief is to a wide swath of the country is ludicrous and would be funny if it wasn’t so disturbing.
You get in your little hole and see the world from your little porthole and thats it… no growth, no development of any kind. This is yet another example of the left run amok and you not being able to see it…. because you don’t want to see it, is your problem not ours.
Here is just one of many possible arguments against your stupid opinion that somehow you think is a fact.
I know I’ve won when you claim victory and promise to stop responding. I wouldn’t let you take back the vomit you spewed in this thread even if you begged me to on all fours and licked the bottom of my filthy shoe.
And you are a lying POS if I ever saw one. Not only is what you said about the Atlanta firebombing completely untrue but it’s hilarious that you are still taking that two week old thread as some sort of victory. In that thread I posted a link titled “Atlanta Wendy’s Set Ablaze by White Female “Anarchist” Police Offer $10,000 dollar reward” with no commentary from me.
If the truth be told I’m sure that this nut is no stranger to protesting and is probably as influenced by antifa as any of these nutty white protesters who burn down black neighborhoods to protest police brutality but danged if this isnt the first I’ve said about it.
So much for that victory you thought you had. sheesh.
You’ve now gone from only posting flaccid insult attempts to asking that people respond to your fiction?
“spinning how something being charged as hate crime isn’t really being charged as a hate crime”
Not really up for adding your reading comprehension issues to the discussion.
““ Both are charged with violation of civil rights; vandalism under $400; and possession of tools to commit vandalism or graffiti; which are all misdemeanors, according to the district attorney’s office.””
The Great Land Robbery
The shameful story of how 1 million black families have been ripped from their farms
A war waged by deed of title has dispossessed 98 percent of black agricultural landowners in America.
“Owners of small farms everywhere, black and white alike, have long been buffeted by larger economic forces. But what happened to black landowners in the South, and particularly in the Delta, is distinct, and was propelled not only by economic change but also by white racism and local white power. A war waged by deed of title has dispossessed 98 percent of black agricultural landowners in America. They have lost 12 million acres over the past century. But even that statement falsely consigns the losses to long-ago history. In fact, the losses mostly occurred within living memory, from the 1950s onward. Today, except for a handful of farmers like the Scotts who have been able to keep or get back some land, black people in this most productive corner of the Deep South own almost nothing of the bounty under their feet.”
I don’t know how many reputable news sources have to say that these people were charged with a hate crime for him to admit he’s a lying sack of shit but I’m sure more than a couple is proof enough for any open minded person that the op is a liar.
Being charged with a hate crime is a misdemeanor! It’s no big deal! lol What a dick.
The Trumpette huddle naturally ignores the written word in “the Vaunted thread” that has become “a hate crime” discussion about a misdemeanor civil rights charge that may be a misdemeanor but could impact employment
(Kidding aside, you lugnuts can read)
Viewing 62 reply threads
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
PewterReport.com prides itself on being the most complete, comprehensive news source covering the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and delivering inside scoop on the team found nowhere else.