I'll review the beliefs of a few of the dumb asses in the thread.Office fire caused the symmetrical collapse of a 47 story steel structure building to come down at free fall speed and collapse in its own foot print. Not structural damage, not jet fuel, not diesel fuel, not airplane. In other words it happened because chairs and desks were on fire. Never mind the fact that NO HIGH RISE BUILDING in the history of the world has ever fallen due to fire, but the usual crew of dumb assess in this thread actually believe it fell because desks and chairs were on fire.As NIST concluded in their report "It was an extraordinary event"Extraordinary, indeed. ::)
C'mon Bucfucious. You're about the only one of the three that has the slightest semblance of a brain cell out of the bunch. Let's see what you got, tough guy. I'm calling you out, beotch.
Let's go ladies, times-a-wastin'
Let's cut to the chase, Moonbeam. Here's the problem with your argument: Logic. As in you haven't got any. You want to point at what you perceive to be discrepancies in the official version of events, but then when you offer your own version of events it has gaping chasms in logic that you pretend aren't there. You can't really attack someone else's argument in an area where your own argument is weaker. The logic tack just isn't working out. All you've really got to work with is a plea to emotion. Rail at Bush. Tell people how he's the Antichrist and just the type of guy to pull something like this. Plenty of people hate him. You'll be able to pull a lot of them in with a passionate enough plea. Not anyone of any consequence, but never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. No matter how absurd a belief is, if you can get a majority to believe it then it becomes normalized and accepted. Two important aspects to your campaign will be making converts feel like they're special and smart because they're in on some kind of secret knowledge, and impress upon them the importance of converting others.In other words, abandon any semblance of a science based belief, and make it more like a religious crusade.
Let's cut to the chase, Moonbeam. Here's the problem with your argument: Logic. As in you haven't got any. You want to point at what you perceive to be discrepancies in the official version of events, but then when you offer your own version of events it has gaping chasms in logic that you pretend aren't there. You can't really attack someone else's argument in an area where your own argument is weaker. The logic tack just isn't working out. All you've really got to work with is a plea to emotion. Rail at Bush. Tell people how he's the Antichrist and just the type of guy to pull something like this. Plenty of people hate him. You'll be able to pull a lot of them in with a passionate enough plea. Not anyone of any consequence, but never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. No matter how absurd a belief is, if you can get a majority to believe it then it becomes normalized and accepted. Two important aspects to your campaign will be making converts feel like they're special and smart because they're in on some kind of secret knowledge, and impress upon them the importance of converting others.In other words, abandon any semblance of a science based belief, and make it more like a religious crusade.
Please tell me this is a joke. You're going w/ the GWB, NWO, False Flag, Loose Change etc. argument to try and make a point about how I'm making a religious crusade?WTF!!Just stop.Every post in this thread and every post in any thread I have ever made in this forum belies that notion entirely. You want to vehemently disagree w/ me on this subject and throw silly barbs back in forth? I'm fine w/ that. But show me any post in any thread that would back up anything that makes you think in your wildest dreams that my opinions on this subject are in anyway politically linked. You're the only one that's playing that card and you know damn well it's complete and utter BS.I have posted links to NIST, is that not a scientifically based argument for you?The rest of this BS is below the belt and you damn well know it.
The inherent flaw with nearly all conspiracy theories is that they deny human nature. Human beings make mistakes, change loyalties, have different motives and different levels of commitment, etc. The notion that a bunch of people associated with the government sat around in a room and planned to bomb a building is far-fetched, to say the least, but the notion that those same people could do that with no one discovering the conspiracy, no one breaking the "circle of trust" etc. . . . . well, that's absolutely absurd.