I'll review the beliefs of a few of the dumb asses in the thread. . . . . .but the usual crew of dumb assess in this thread actually believe it fell because desks and chairs were on fire.
"Agreeableness was negatively related to belief in 9-11 conspiracy theories. People who are less agreeable were more accepting of 9-11 conspiracy theories." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mental-mishaps/201009/conspiracy-theorists-is-the-truth-out-there
The inherent flaw with nearly all conspiracy theories is that they deny human nature. Human beings make mistakes, change loyalties, have different motives and different levels of commitment, etc. The notion that a bunch of people associated with the government sat around in a room and planned to bomb a building is far-fetched, to say the least, but the notion that those same people could do that with no one discovering the conspiracy, no one breaking the "circle of trust" etc. . . . . well, that's absolutely absurd.
I think that's what an average person would say and it's broad generalization . But no one's making that argument so its irrelevant.
I'll review the beliefs of a few of the dumb asses in the thread. . . . . .but the usual crew of dumb assess in this thread actually believe it fell because desks and chairs were on fire.
"Agreeableness was negatively related to belief in 9-11 conspiracy theories. People who are less agreeable were more accepting of 9-11 conspiracy theories." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mental-mishaps/201009/conspiracy-theorists-is-the-truth-out-there
So noted. Thank you, counselor. ::)
If it wasn't debris and fire that damaged the building...then what damaged it structurally to the point where gravity took over and brought it down?
What are you saying?
Im not "saying" anything.
I would agree.Next.
Nice dodge. Typical.
The inherent flaw with nearly all conspiracy theories is that they deny human nature. Human beings make mistakes, change loyalties, have different motives and different levels of commitment, etc. The notion that a bunch of people associated with the government sat around in a room and planned to bomb a building is far-fetched, to say the least, but the notion that those same people could do that with no one discovering the conspiracy, no one breaking the "circle of trust" etc. . . . . well, that's absolutely absurd.
I think that's what an average person would say and it's broad generalization . But no one's making that argument so its irrelevant.
you are. even putting aside the science and facts you ignore, for your theory to be true every human involved would have had to have been absolutely perfect in the planning, execution and post-bombing silence . . . pre-bombing, not a single person who considered participation but backed out, not a single person inadvertently finding a conspirator's research on a computer, no inadvertent discovery of a telling communication . . . . . . . .during the event, . . . no dropped receipt, no inadvertent video surveillance, no delivery driver happening upon conspirators . . and after the bombing . . . . not a single wife aware of the conspiracy that is now part of a bitter divorce, no scorned lovers, no disaffected former conspirators. not a single surviving piece of evidence of bomb (they found all kinds of evidence of planes in the other towers), . . . . etc. etc. etc etc.
