"I have nothing to support my theory, so I'll insult everyone and see if they're dumb enough to let me shift the burden of proof onto them."That's the level of thinking we're not bothering to deal with, but are taking the time to chuckle at.
The burden of proof is always the one making the assertion. An assertion of office fire collapsing a 47 story steel structure is absurd. Almost as absurd is your entire refusal to admit your mistakes on this subject and pathetically change the discussion that I need to explain demolition. But of course if this were a discussion about the fall of the building you'd have nothing to add as evidenced by your lack of knowledge on the subject. Your entire input has been nothing short of a school boy howler.
Mr. Milich: "The burden of proof is always the one making the assertion."For everyone but you, you mean?
Mr. Milich: "The burden of proof is always the one making the assertion."For everyone but you, you mean?
So you do plan on telling us how about the structural damage and diesel fuel now? And then tell us how the NIST report is correct. I mean take your choice it's your fable.
I was burning some wood in a 55 gal. drum last night and sure enough, that drum collapsed right in front of me.Sincerely,Bucfucious
