yea, it sucks, but you and Vin are on the same side of this one...
I also dont begrudge Durango for having his conspiracy theory, but he invites the nonsense in this thread because he calls all who disagree idiots. In facts, I would go so far as to say Durango calls everyone idiots in threads like this so they will entertain him, its sort of his "thing."If Durango had an earnest interest in sharing/discussing his theory (as opposed to entertaining himself with the name calling etc) you would not see him engage in all the "I dont have the burden of proof" and "admit I a right first" nonsense he posts in this thread. he would just simply explain his views. So, its either part of a game for him or he is just insecure about his theory. maybe both, who knows?
lol, you have to see the irony of this post
LMAO. That supposed civility didn't last too long.
lol, oh well . .
" the truth is Olaf and I have one major substantive disagreement but we actually have similar view on many issues. same with Illuminator." 
yea, it sucks, but you and Vin are on the same side of this one...
I also dont begrudge Durango for having his conspiracy theory, but he invites the nonsense in this thread because he calls all who disagree idiots. In facts, I would go so far as to say Durango calls everyone idiots in threads like this so they will entertain him, its sort of his "thing."If Durango had an earnest interest in sharing/discussing his theory (as opposed to entertaining himself with the name calling etc) you would not see him engage in all the "I dont have the burden of proof" and "admit I a right first" nonsense he posts in this thread. he would just simply explain his views. So, its either part of a game for him or he is just insecure about his theory. maybe both, who knows?
lol, you have to see the irony of this post
LMAO. That supposed civility didn't last too long.
Sorry, the irony was just too strong, lol. The "major substantive disagreement" (which of course he has with 99% of the board) is fueled by his name calling and personal attacks directed at the people that didn't agree/countered his "message". I also dont begrudge Vin for having his guns opinion, but he invites the nonsense in the threads because he calls all who disagree idiots. In facts, I would go so far as to say Vin calls everyone idiots in threads like this so they will entertain him, its sort of his "thing."If Vin had an earnest interest in sharing/discussing his opinions (as opposed to entertaining himself with the name calling etc) you would not see him engage in all the "Pro-gun fear" and "admit I a right first" nonsense he posts in the threads. he would just simply explain his views. So, its either part of a game for him or he is just insecure about his opinion. maybe both, who knows?
Here, let me help you out. If you really think it was office fire. Jut show me a few photos of said office fire. Let's start there shall we?Lord knows couldn't be any easier than that, right?Good ahead, dazzle me.
Moron, idiot, retard. Seriously, what part of the NIST report of 25% of the building being ripped away do you fail to understand? The fire alone did not bring down the building. The fact that a whole flipping chunk of it was missing was a big problem...along with a fire, along with a load distribution that spread weight to the edge of the. Yielding thus making the damage received even more critical.. Yeah, little office fire.
Here, let me help you out. If you really think it was office fire. Jut show me a few photos of said office fire. Let's start there shall we?Lord knows couldn't be any easier than that, right?Good ahead, dazzle me.
Moron, idiot, retard.Seriously, what part of the NIST report of 25% of the building being ripped away do you fail to understand? The fire alone did not bring down the building. The fact that a whole flipping chunk of it was missing was a big problem...along with a fire, along with a load distribution that spread weight to the edge of the. Yielding thus making the damage received even more critical.. Yeah, little office fire.
The queen of dramatics is back.Let me help you out, again. BTW..This was posted about 5 pages ago and published in 2008. ::)
"NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse""Finally, the report notes that "while debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7.""NIST's conclusion."Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event," said NIST WTC Lead Investigator Shyam Sunder. "Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down." http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc-082108.cfm
