Here is one with more footage of the simple "office fire". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8
How about this one? More modern.Fully Engulfed. Raging fire. Nope. Never fell.The most recent example of a spectacular skyscraper fire was the burning of the Hotel Mandarin Oriental starting on February 9, 2009. The nearly completed 520-foot-tall skyscraper in Beijing caught fire around 8:00 pm, was engulfed within 20 minutes, and burned for at least 3 hours until midnight. Despite the fact that the fire extended across all of the floors for a period of time and burned out of control for hours, no large portion of the structure collapsed.
If this is your case counselor, then you have no case.Are you saying that what was shown on that clip was the cause a collapse of a 47 story steel structure building?Do you have any clue how incredibly freakin' ridiculous that is?Seriously?
you are the one with the wacky theory, the burden is on you to make others believe it, if that is your goal, so . . . . you have things backwards. You'd have to explain how it WAS explosives and how there has not been a single conspirator uncovered etc. You'd have to explain your alternate causation, not the other way around. I think you've already hurt your credibility by characterizing that fire as an "office fire," but I can look past that. Just start by explaining how the government conspirators have never been exposed . . .
"I think you've already hurt your credibility by characterizing that fire as an "office fire," but I can look past that." But I'm not going to look past it. Because that's your theory not mine. If you believe the official explanation then you believe office fire. Which is why you've spent the last few posts trying to show office fire. No chief. I'm not the one that has to explain what happened that day. YOU are the one that's making the assertion and thusly the proof is on you and your government conspiracy theory.
Instead of you boys spending time on youtube to validate your already formed opinions you should spend some time actually reading what a vast amount of qualified professionals have gone on the record as having said. You're both too busy scrambling for rebuttal material instead of actually reading about the subject. Here I'll help you out. http://www.ae911truth.org/en/evidence.html
