Former Tampa cop sh...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Former Tampa cop shoots man for texting during movie

450 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
8,396 Views
F807B5609Eae64257Bf4877652Ea49Fee40Ac2451C152C12Fa596Ffeda647157?S=80&D=Mm&R=G
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Cabin Boy
Joined: 1 second ago

You have no point and you've never had a point Poor Spartan has the patience of a saint and even he can't keep you from shifting, changing and morphing your way from one rant to the next. It's absolutely mind boggling to normal thinking people what causes you to carry on like a village idiot after being exposed so many times. You range from complete ignorance on the subject to feigning some sob sister image to save the country with absolutely no plan whatsoever. I told you well over a year ago to put a plan on the table and to this day we are still here waiting. You're a provocateur, a shameful attention seeker and a complete hypocrite. You cite a false premise and expect others to buy into as if it makes sense. Bucfucious has explained the issues you're dealing with and I've labeled you psycho boy for the same reason. But just be honest with yourself you've been told these things all your life and yet you can't help yourself. You just want any kind of attention you can get.  No one here takes you seriously. You've become the butt of this forum not because of your opinions on whatever issue you provoke but because there's no consistency in any of your arguments. With the regard to your latest post. That's whats called institutional advertising. It's very common and been around for ages. let me give you an example. Have you ever seen a TV commercial advertising the need to have a will prepared? But the ad doesn't specify a lawyer? The purpose of the ad is to raise the awareness of having a will and motivate people to get one. Which results in additional clientele. I can only pray that when they do they're able to find a vastly more competent one than a raging fool like yourself. :-* :-* :-*

Daniel was engaging in institutional advertising?bwhahahahahahaahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahha

"We believe the average, that the majority of the Super Bowl fans have the same values that we have at Daniel Defense," Daniel said on the Fox show. "That is, we believe in protecting our families, we believe in our 2nd Amendment, which is our right to protect ourselves. We believe in the 1st Amendment, which is really the issue here. We're trying to exercise our 1st Amendment rights to give our opinion on the 2nd Amendment and not being allowed to do so."

lol https://danieldefense.com/

Reply
F807B5609Eae64257Bf4877652Ea49Fee40Ac2451C152C12Fa596Ffeda647157?S=80&D=Mm&R=G
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Cabin Boy
Joined: 1 second ago

You have no point and you've never had a point Poor Spartan has the patience of a saint and even he can't keep you from shifting, changing and morphing your way from one rant to the next. It's absolutely mind boggling to normal thinking people what causes you to carry on like a village idiot after being exposed so many times. You range from complete ignorance on the subject to feigning some sob sister image to save the country with absolutely no plan whatsoever. I told you well over a year ago to put a plan on the table and to this day we are still here waiting. You're a provocateur, a shameful attention seeker and a complete hypocrite. You cite a false premise and expect others to buy into as if it makes sense. Bucfucious has explained the issues you're dealing with and I've labeled you psycho boy for the same reason. But just be honest with yourself you've been told these things all your life and yet you can't help yourself. You just want any kind of attention you can get.  No one here takes you seriously. You've become the butt of this forum not because of your opinions on whatever issue you provoke but because there's no consistency in any of your arguments. With the regard to your latest post. That's whats called institutional advertising. It's very common and been around for ages. let me give you an example. Have you ever seen a TV commercial advertising the need to have a will prepared? But the ad doesn't specify a lawyer? The purpose of the ad is to raise the awareness of having a will and motivate people to get one. Which results in additional clientele. I can only pray that when they do they're able to find a vastly more competent one than a raging fool like yourself. :-* :-* :-*

Daniel was engaging in institutional advertising?bwhahahahahahaahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahha

"We believe the average, that the majority of the Super Bowl fans have the same values that we have at Daniel Defense," Daniel said on the Fox show. "That is, we believe in protecting our families, we believe in our 2nd Amendment, which is our right to protect ourselves. We believe in the 1st Amendment, which is really the issue here. We're trying to exercise our 1st Amendment rights to give our opinion on the 2nd Amendment and not being allowed to do so."

lol https://danieldefense.com/

Yea, Daniel's not feeding the poor you idiot, but he is capable of presenting more than one more message at a time. Something- not surprisingly-you simply can't comprehend. Now what's next from you? You've rail against his 1st amendment, want to eliminate the 2nd and then gripe about him engaging in free enterprise. You're really on a roll, comrade.

Reply
F807B5609Eae64257Bf4877652Ea49Fee40Ac2451C152C12Fa596Ffeda647157?S=80&D=Mm&R=G
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Cabin Boy
Joined: 1 second ago

You've rail against his 1st amendment, want to eliminate the 2nd and then gripe about him engaging in free enterprise.

Ahh . . the "if you disagree with me you are not an American" card  is out again. Not surprisingly, the same card played by Daniel.This is the DISHONEST comment you are defending Archie:

We believe in the 1st Amendment, which is really the issue here. We're trying to exercise our 1st Amendment rights to give our opinion on the 2nd Amendment and not being allowed to do so."

It had nothing to do with a belief in the 1st Amendment and the 1st Amendment  wasn't "really the issue here," it had to do with wanting to selling guns, the issue was selling guns. It had nothing to do with wanting to give "our opinion on the 2nd Amendment and not being allowed to do so" it had to do with wanting to sell guns.lol, the Truth will set you free . . . . that is, unless you're the target audience  (pun almost intended)

Reply
F807B5609Eae64257Bf4877652Ea49Fee40Ac2451C152C12Fa596Ffeda647157?S=80&D=Mm&R=G
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Cabin Boy
Joined: 1 second ago

Now you want to digress. You're starting to wear me out. Let's try and cut to the chase, shall we? Put a specific proposal on the table, so the whole forum can finally see exactly what you want on the subject of gun control. Not that I believe that for one second you're capable of doing it.You've got the stage, counselor. Go on, prove me wrong.

Reply
F807B5609Eae64257Bf4877652Ea49Fee40Ac2451C152C12Fa596Ffeda647157?S=80&D=Mm&R=G
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Cabin Boy
Joined: 1 second ago

Now you want to digress.

no, you want to run from your defense, lol.  you and Daniel share a common bond it seems, you both think everyone else is stupid.  That was probably the worst ham-handed retreat I have read on these boards . . . "um . .  I don't have a response so . . . um . . . yeah . . .  I am going to change the subject and then blame you when you dont follow along . . "pfffffffffftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt :-[

Reply
Page 48 / 90
Share: