The Counselor is being outlawyered by anonymous people on the internet.
This isn't Stetson Law.
/threadlol
roflmao ^^^^^ I could not have made the point below better myself
Buggsy, this was on page 15 I think . . . what page are we on now? Look at the responses from all the pro-gun types . . and . . . well . . you
Escobar, engaging the good counselor is a fool's errand.The appropriate response, I have learned, is to sit back and laugh.
lol ^^^^^^^ #confidencebuilderActually Buggsy if you go find a reasonable adult to help you what he or she will explain to you is that the overwhelming majority of the pro-gun posts in this thread are focused on me and not the issue because there is no response to this:the gun was the proximate cause of the deathIf that ^^^ statement by me was not true, this thread ends pages ago with a simple honest counter, but instead because that statement is the simple undeniable truth ... and the truth hurts ... the only thing a bunch of the pro-gun types have as a response is to deflect the attention from that truth. Any honest and reasonable adult will tell you that is what we are witnessing here Buggsy. The funny thing is your insecurity, in general and on this issue specifically, leads you to post that you are the one sitting back laughing without even realizing the bitter irony. ;)
By the way Buggsy, if you find that adult to help you, he or she will probably tell you that an HONEST response to my post above and the statement that the GUN was the proximate cause of death would be to say:"yes, that is true . . but . . ."However, the same adult would probably tell you that what will likely follow AFTER my comment above will be more of the same . . . more of the previous 16 pages, more comment about me rather than the fact that the GUN was the proximate cause of death . . . . . . .which really only proves my point further
man, you guys are funny.
Australian murder rate. Guns banned n 1996. Murder rate barely wavered:
You saw it. You are wrong again. You will continue to post your nonsense anyway. Carry on.
nor could I ........ /threadlol
Australian murder rate. Guns banned n 1996. Murder rate barely wavered:
Spartan, before I take the time to respond to your UK and Australia charts, you lived in the UK (I think) so you are in a unique position to know, are you saying that the murder rate in the UK and in Australia would've been the same over the time frame of the charts WITHOUT the gun laws in those two countries? I know you are posting the charts to say that the gun laws did not change the murder rate, but I suspect you only mean that in the sense that the rate did not go down (in your view)? Is that correct, do you think the murder rate in those two countries stay the same with no gun restrictions in place?Thanks
"so as I said its not that ACT of pulling a trigger and pointing that is the proximate cause of the death because the pointing and trigger pulling could have been on a water gun, it is the ACT of having the gun (i.e. firearm) there, or stated differently, bringing the gun."So we're finally agreed, the gun was not the proximate cause, bringing it to a place it was prohibited was. You stepped right into that one, Shifty Dancer. Now spin your way out.
