in the absence of a substantive reponse ^^^^^^ attack the messenger
I would attack the messenger but I don't have a gun. Maybe I'll get drunk and run over them with my car. Just as effective.
http://tbo.com/pasco-county/bond-hearing-resumes-in-pasco-theater-shooting-case-20140207/ “I thought the guy was going to beat the (expletive) out of me,” Reeves said on the tape, which was played in court this morning during a bond hearing for Reeves.---
Also on the tape, Reeves expressed regrets about how the situation unfolded.“If I had it to do over again, it never would have happened,” Reeves said. “We would have moved.”
Reeves’ attorneys, meanwhile, laid out their defense: That their client felt threatened by the much younger Oulson.
I would attack the messenger but I don't have a gun. Maybe I'll get drunk and run over them with my car. Just as effective.
absence of substance ^^ attack the messenger , but hey you are a guy who has posted that more guns = more gun violence after having denied that point for months . . lol . . . so I wouldnt expect anything but nonsense from you. You are to a gun debate what Durango is to a Building 7 debate :-)
In an oversimplified sense, SYG is the castle doctrine outside the castle . . . . click this link and you can read perhaps the weakest SYG/castle doctrine defense ever: http://tbo.com/pasco-county/bond-hearing-resumes-in-pasco-theater-shooting-case-20140207/ The interesting thing about this from a gun debate perspective though is that in his comments the shooter said that he would've simply moved seats if he could do it all over again. That is the problem with a gun, it is a very effective weapon so the results are profound even with a moment of misjudgment. . An angry man confronted by nothing but popcorn or a jealous boyfriend, a distraught family member or a careless parent . . add a gun to any of those and someone likey ends up dead. More guns = more gun violence
