Dal, how about the teacher that said she saw two shadows? How about the guy chased into the woods? Could the officers be attempting to cover up the actual number of shooters that day? Was the teacher lying? Unfortunately nobody knows, because very little has been revealed about the man chased into the wooded area. I read he was a parent who went to the school to make gingerbread houses with the kids, heard the gunshots and took off running, and I read he was an off duty officer from another county. What he'd be randomly doing in the woods at the exact time of the shooting is a mystery to me, as is the reason he would run from the cops. An eyewitness, you can find his interview if truly interested, says he was there when the man was escorted to the police car in handcuffs. He said the guy was put in the front seat of the car, odd, and was wearing camo pants and a black shirt. Why hasn't this been followed up on? In my mind this guy is more likely to be the killer than Lanza. In fact, it's more likely that he was Christopher Rodia...you know, since the car in the parking lot was registered to him. All could be cleared up with actual proof, yet none has been released...how odd.
lol
Your comments are so ridiculous it is hard to follow your "point".You talked about PARAMEDICS never seeing the victims and then not wanting to take cop's word, but see it yourself.
Do I need to start calling you Corky? My point is very clear, I want to see proof of what we've been told. It's as simple as that. If you look up the Columbine shooting, you'll very quickly find a picture of the killers laying in a pool of blood. Where is that picture for Adam Lanza? Why was it okay to release that picture in 1999, but not 2014?
Sadly even a basic google search on something like "sandy hook first responders" will pull up accounts from the people who were there and saw the dead bodies, found Lanza, engaged him, and so forth. This isn't hard to find info so unless a whole crap ton of local cops and state trooper are lying for some odd purpose that makes nonsense WTF are you on about with this proof crap? http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/04/sandy_hook_first_responder_key.html http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/investigations/Sandy-Hook-The-First-15-Minutes-221260161.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/nyregion/horrors-of-newtown-shooting-scene-are-slow-to-fade.html?pagewanted=all
Are you really this dense? I said PARAMEDICS weren't allowed in the school and never saw the victims. How did your "basic google search" prove that as incorrect? Every one of those links talk about cops entering the building, when did I say that didn't happen? I didn't, so I think you know where you can shove those links. You're a great example of what's wrong with this country. People are now willing to accept the word of others as proof of something. I don't know why these cops would lie, or if they even are. I do know that I haven't seen any proof myself, and if the media isn't going to provide that, what the hell do they even exist for?
Wow, I mean this is really insane. So these people who saw, many of whom have been interviewed or spoken publically so they are not being filtered by the "evil" media, the dead bodies in situ. So unless you think these cops are lying what is your premise?
You're wrong...COMPLETELY wrong. I would tell you how wrong you are, but Amazing Atheist put it better than I ever could. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snViuRNT5Jk
"Amazing Atheist" is all I needed to see. Pass.
So watching Amazing Atheist is dumb but believing in a ridiculous and overly complicated government conspiracy isn't?
The way evolutionists believe life was created has been proven to be a mathematical impossibility. Your little atheist friend believes in it regardless. So, yes, I'll take "overly complicated" in favor of someone who believes in the impossible.
