You're wrong...COMPLETELY wrong. I would tell you how wrong you are, but Amazing Atheist put it better than I ever could. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snViuRNT5Jk
"Amazing Atheist" is all I needed to see. Pass.
So watching Amazing Atheist is dumb but believing in a ridiculous and overly complicated government conspiracy isn't?
The way evolutionists believe life was created has been proven to be a mathematical impossibility. Your little atheist friend believes in it regardless. So, yes, I'll take "overly complicated" in favor of someone who believes in the impossible.
Let me make one thing clear...I don't believe in everything Amazing Atheist says. In fact there are plenty of times where I downright want to STRANGLE him as a devout theist. But I think the video I posted was alright and proved the conspiracy wrong. I say that 60% of the time he's right, and 40% he's flat out wrong. Can we agree to disagree, after all, it's not like I'm a HUGE Amazing Atheist fan, or even think he's a good, nice person. I just find him funny and for the most part pretty smart.
Okay, and I'll make something clear. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy in the sense that it didn't happen. I think there are many holes, many things that can't (and haven't) be explained, but outside of that I'm not sure what happened. Cops attempting to cover up the fact that another shooter or shooterS were responsible for this, wouldn't be too hard to believe or as you put it "overly complicated".
Alright, I suppose that's reasonable. Just be careful with threads like this, posting doubts about Sandy Hook is dangerous and WILL be interpreted by some in ways you don't want. I myself believe some crazy things; I have doubts about Osama's death, I think we have been visited by extra terrestrial life. That said, I usually keep these ideas relativley quiet so as to avoid sparking controversy. If I were you, I'd lock the thread and just have a PM conversation with some people willing to listen. I'm all ears about this as long as you have a good argument. I would never in a million years think this was faked, but you could have decent reasoning, I don't know. :)
I've been posting on this forum for nearly 15 years, I'm well aware of how things go around here. I realize you aren't trying to be an asshole, so don't take this the wrong way but you need to grow a spine. The fact that you'd lock a thread, or avoid stating your opinion on any matter because you don't think it would be well received is ridiculous. Don't be a coward, we have too many of those around here already.
Okay, and I'll make something clear. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy in the sense that it didn't happen. I think there are many holes, many things that can't (and haven't) be explained, but outside of that I'm not sure what happened. Cops attempting to cover up the fact that another shooter or shooterS were responsible for this, wouldn't be too hard to believe or as you put it "overly complicated".
There is always holes in these situations. That's why they called chaotic.
If you've watched the videos of the scene, chaotic is the last thing you'd describe it as. I'm not exaggerating when I say cops were standing around. In one video a cop is hanging out by the hood of his car having a snack. There's eyewitness testimony of more than one person being involved, the media ignores that angle, and they won't release photo/video evidence of the "real" killer. We aren't supposed to question that?
lol
If you've watched the videos of the scene, chaotic is the last thing you'd describe it as. I'm not exaggerating when I say cops were standing around. In one video a cop is hanging out by the hood of his car having a snack. There's eyewitness testimony of more than one person being involved, the media ignores that angle, and they won't release photo/video evidence of the "real" killer. We aren't supposed to question that?
As any cop will tell you, the worst witness in the world is an eye witness.And, what's more, the video you see is normally after the worst has happened so is not as chaotic.
So cops are to be trusted, eyewitness are to be ignored? Regardless, I don't need to rely on eyewitness testimony to tell me that someone was chased into the woods. There's video proof of it. The only thing I can't confirm on my own is the teacher who saw two shadows. Was she in a state of panic and not seeing things clearly? Maybe. But I wasn't in a state of panic when I watched the video of a man running into the woods, a man the MSM has completely ignored.
