Why would there be a need to frisk anybody in Chicago? They have some of the strictest gun laws in the country . . . and everyone know Chicago is the first city in the world enclosed in a glass bubble
oh the stupidity . . . glass bubble . . . pfftway to add your usual NOTHING to the conversation scarecrow
Despite your snarky comments Vin I am on board with you on this one. You can't arbitrarily harass people but given a cause to stop someone, I am so on board with stop and frisk. The "cause" however is the sticky point isn't it? There needs to be rules but I do not agree with it being banned completely. I am also on board with swamping crime laden neighborhoods with extra cops. It doesn't have to be "the hood" either, because quite often sh*t A frequently goes from neighborhood B to neighborhood C to commit crime. Now that also runs the risk of racial profiling, so it is a tender subject. Needs a balance.
agreed that it is a tough balance, but it works . . . profiling works . . .disarming people works . . but
disarming people works
Only if you live in a bubble, right Counselor?
disarming people works
Only if you live in a bubble, right Counselor?
I guess you couldn't read the actual article scarecrow? Guess you can't read many articles about the same program in NYC? lolHere, just so you don't have to run and find an adult to explain things to you, let me try (I am out of crayons, sorry) to point out what should be the OBVIOUS disconnect between your two posts in this thread. Ready, here we go:1. You suggested that city gun laws should be the solution when OBVIOUSLY anyone can bring a gun in from outside the city2. Stop & Frisk actually REMOVES guns from the street. That is the point. Less guns, less gun violence (see the word "less" scarecrow?)3. Comparing the two makes no sense because you don't need Stop & Frisk to be PERFECT to reduce gun violence (see Chicago, MYC and more). Conversely, you would need a bubble (i.e., a PERFECT defense) to impact gun violence under the "but they have the toughest gun laws" system, which is why your first comment is STUPID.See . . . its not that hard. Scarecrow, just so you know . . . the people who create talking point arguments like the nonsensical one you keep repeating ("Chicago has the toughest guns laws") are counting on people who do not (or cannot) think.
way to represent the niche.
Less guns in the wrong hands decreases gun violence. More guns in the right hands also decreases gun violence. Taking away everyone's rights and forcing them to live under government occupation would also decrease gun violence. All been covered a thousand times, someone just needs attention. Stop giving it to him.
