I'm 100% sure Jeanine Garafolo ...eerrrrr...Garopollo would not beat out Glennon , not in his rookie year at least.Grass is not always greener...Would you really pass over a dynamic player like Odell Beckham for this little QB from Eastern ?
I think regardless of any QB we take, Glennon is at the very least starting the season as QB1
Lol mh.
Lol mh.
its pretty obvious, really. Bortles and Manziel aren't NFL ready. Bridgewater might be, but he'll be gone before then. Carr can probably run a vanilla offense so maybe, but they'll be patient.Lovie Smith will get at least 4 seasons here. Theres no need to rush. IF they draft a QB, they'll be patient, bring him along carefully and let Glennon take the licks while letting the defense keep us in games for at least 4 weeks
Problem is they couldn't afford for Glennon to ball out. Then they look dumb for spending a top 10 pick on another QB. Therefore you have to play the rookie.
Problem is they couldn't afford for Glennon to ball out. Then they look dumb for spending a top 10 pick on another QB. Therefore you have to play the rookie.
Not really. If Glennon is balling out, it'll mean we're winning and no one will care. Then, if/when the opportunity presents itself, you trade one of them and have a great stash of draft picks on a playoff team
Problem is they couldn't afford for Glennon to ball out. Then they look dumb for spending a top 10 pick on another QB. Therefore you have to play the rookie.
Not really. If Glennon is balling out, it'll mean we're winning and no one will care. Then, if/when the opportunity presents itself, you trade one of them and have a great stash of draft picks on a playoff team
No, you don't trade one of them , you'd trade Carr....in which case he'd have hardly any trade value because he hasn't played any or proven anything. You might get a 3rd if you are lucky , more likely a 4th-5th , and you'd have wasted a premium pick.But I guess it's true no one would really care as long as the team is winning ...but wasting that top 10 pick could be the difference between wild card winning and Superbowl contending winning ....If it's no hurry why not see what you have in Glennon and then go all out to get a better QB in next year's draft, if need be , rather than reach for Carr?
Problem is they couldn't afford for Glennon to ball out. Then they look dumb for spending a top 10 pick on another QB. Therefore you have to play the rookie.
Not really. If Glennon is balling out, it'll mean we're winning and no one will care. Then, if/when the opportunity presents itself, you trade one of them and have a great stash of draft picks on a playoff team
No, you don't trade one of them , you'd trade Carr....in which case he'd have hardly any trade value because he hasn't played any or proven anything. You might get a 3rd if you are lucky , more likely a 4th-5th , and you'd have wasted a premium pick.But I guess it's true no one would really care as long as the team is winning ...but wasting that top 10 pick could be the difference between wild card winning and Superbowl contending winning ....If it's no hurry why not see what you have in Glennon and then go all out to get a better QB in next year's draft, if need be , rather than reach for Carr?
It just depends on what the team sees in Carr. Could be a Rivers/Brees type situation except instead of FA, one would be traded.All very speculative. Maybe the rookie (whether Carr or whoever) is already better in the offense than Glennon. I just don't think that drafting one necessarily means Glennon will be on the bench immediately.
Everybody seems perfectly ok with bringing a rookie QB in and bringing him along slowly. Letting him make his rookie mistakes. You know, giving him a couple years to no longer be a rookie.So long as its the QB they want. Why does Glennon not get these considerations? He hasn't even played a full season yet and that was under what most consider to be poor coaching. He is already on the roster and costs us nothing. By all accounts he lives at the facility and has a drive and will to be great that is very uncommon. Call me crazy but I am not ready to count this kid out yet.
No, you don't trade one of them , you'd trade Carr....in which case he'd have hardly any trade value because he hasn't played any or proven anything. You might get a 3rd if you are lucky , more likely a 4th-5th , and you'd have wasted a premium pick.
This would be fairly unlikely.
Everybody seems perfectly ok with bringing a rookie QB in and bringing him along slowly. Letting him make his rookie mistakes. You know, giving him a couple years to no longer be a rookie.So long as its the QB they want. Why does Glennon not get these considerations? He hasn't even played a full season yet and that was under what most consider to be poor coaching. He is already on the roster and costs us nothing. By all accounts he lives at the facility and has a drive and will to be great that is very uncommon. Call me crazy but I am not ready to count this kid out yet.
I'm calling you crazy.
Everybody seems perfectly ok with bringing a rookie QB in and bringing him along slowly. Letting him make his rookie mistakes. You know, giving him a couple years to no longer be a rookie.So long as its the QB they want. Why does Glennon not get these considerations? He hasn't even played a full season yet and that was under what most consider to be poor coaching. He is already on the roster and costs us nothing. By all accounts he lives at the facility and has a drive and will to be great that is very uncommon. Call me crazy but I am not ready to count this kid out yet.
I'm calling you crazy.
Says the guy who thought Freeman was a great QB right up until the moment we benched him.
Well, Tedford will make the call, ultimately. My guess is that he already knows if he wants Glennon replaced or not, and since there has been all these nuggets dropping by Litch and Lovie about not ruling out QB's, it doesn't look good for Glennon. Bottom line is, if Glennon was seen as "the guy" by this incoming staff, they wouldn't risk a fractured relationship or bruising his confidence by going on record saying they are looking at other options. Glennon may very well get to start, but it will most likely only be because the opportunity to upgrade never presented itself.
Um, I'm pretty sure I thought freeman was a joke AND a bad draft pick until the throwback game, where pretty much everyone else jumped aboard too.And yes, I did think he was a good qb. Hard to know your starting qb for the last few years is popping molly.But then again, I think every qb not hopped up on drugs can be great within the right system.But you go on jabbering about a four win, 3rd round, average nfl qb on one of the worst offenses statistically. And to top it all off, lovie and tedford don't even want to start him.
Everybody seems perfectly ok with bringing a rookie QB in and bringing him along slowly. Letting him make his rookie mistakes. You know, giving him a couple years to no longer be a rookie.So long as its the QB they want. Why does Glennon not get these considerations? He hasn't even played a full season yet and that was under what most consider to be poor coaching. He is already on the roster and costs us nothing. By all accounts he lives at the facility and has a drive and will to be great that is very uncommon. Call me crazy but I am not ready to count this kid out yet.
Many people don't believe he has the upside of the first round options
I'm not convinced he doesn't.
