How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Barr is all finesse and speed. He is much closer to a prototypical 3-4 OLB than he is a 4-3 DE. Could he add more weight than Mack, probably, but then you also dont know what that would do to him as a player. Mack is a bit on the smaller side for a DE thats for sure, but his motor and violence at the point of impact are something you cannot teach and I would rather have that over Barr.
How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Which is insight you've gathered from google images.
Bucs don't need a samback that bad. Out of those three Ealy makes the most sense. And I am not a fan. At all.
Boid is right. From a scheme perspective Ealy is the only one that makes sense. The other two are bad scheme fits.
Man Trent Richardson sucks. Oh...no to any of these guys. None. Not a single one. Mack might be the next English (chargers). Barr has too many question marks, including effectiveness in scheme. And Ealy is just average, as a prospect IMO. Bucs do not need a Sam backer at the seven spot. Hell no.
How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Which is insight you've gathered from google images.
You mean by looking at him ? .....yeah that's usually how you form an opinion on something like this , LOLThanks for the pointless observation. You're being watched.
How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Barr is all finesse and speed. He is much closer to a prototypical 3-4 OLB than he is a 4-3 DE. Could he add more weight than Mack, probably, but then you also dont know what that would do to him as a player. Mack is a bit on the smaller side for a DE thats for sure, but his motor and violence at the point of impact are something you cannot teach and I would rather have that over Barr.
You could be right , it's all a matter of opinion. I like Barr though.
How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Which is insight you've gathered from google images.
You mean by looking at him ? .....yeah that's usually how you form an opinion on something like this , LOLThanks for the pointless observation. You're being watched.
Absolutely. Its never done by team physicians or doctors. Its usually done by message board members with no medical experience! How silly!I know. You like watching me when I shower. I get it, I'm flattered.
You need a doctor now to have an opinion on if someone has maxed their potential playing weight or not?? LOL Adults are talking here , watched boy ...take a hike.
The quick get off and finish :
The speed off the edge :
The Power :
The Quickness and Pursuit :
The physicality :
The frame to add more weight :
Call me crazy , but I like this kid , lol.
Sammy Watkins if he is gone, then Mike Evans. Did anyone notice what happened when Mike Williams went down last year?
How does Mack fit any better in a 4-3 than Barr ??If anything hes a worse fit in my eyes because he's already completely rocked up and can't add any more weight.
Barr is all finesse and speed. He is much closer to a prototypical 3-4 OLB than he is a 4-3 DE. Could he add more weight than Mack, probably, but then you also dont know what that would do to him as a player. Mack is a bit on the smaller side for a DE thats for sure, but his motor and violence at the point of impact are something you cannot teach and I would rather have that over Barr.
You could be right , it's all a matter of opinion. I like Barr though.
Very true, all opinion. Both are gambles to be sure.
