"You said he fell off of a 10 game cliff. How do you explain him playing well before that?"You admitted yourself that he declined, you just tried to blame Schiano by ignoring the fact that it began under Raheem. Of course he player better before that, playing crappy to begin with and then playing crappy some more does not constitute a decline. Look the word up if you need to.
"You said he fell off of a 10 game cliff. How do you explain him playing well before that?"You admitted yourself that he declined, you just tried to blame Schiano by ignoring the fact that it began under Raheem. Of course he player better before that, playing crappy to begin with and then playing crappy some more does not constitute a decline. Look the word up if you need to.
Faking it until you make it, huh Buc Von Luminator?
The Black Hole.
The Black Hole.
No. A black hole is claiming that Freeman's decline happened before Schiano, and when asked what was the reason that he played well in the first 10 games of 2012 to get Schiano off to a promising start to his tenure here, you divert to asking me to look up vocabulary words for you.Freeman's first 10 games under Schiano, he completed 56.4% of his passes and had a TD to INT ratio of 21:7. Freeman went on a 5 game stretch in Schiano's first 10 where his QB rating never dipped lower than 104.2.In his last 9 games starting under Schiano, he completed 50.8% of his passes and had a TD to INT ratio of 8:14. He only had one game with a QB rating over 80.0. So why don't you look up "decline", sport, and tell me if it means starting the 2012 season off better than you ended the 2011 season, and then "falling off of a 10 game cliff".
Alright, Black Hole, you win. From first round "franchise QB" to deer in the headlights, inactive on game day, Vikings third stringer is not a decline.
You admitted yourself that he declined, you just tried to blame Schiano
Alright, Black Hole, you win. From first round "franchise QB" to deer in the headlights, inactive on game day, Vikings third stringer is not a decline.
Surrender noted.
4-2 in his last six. Schiano is a great coach. He has really turned the corner.
Who cares whether he is an improvement or not. Neither are good NFL head coaches.At least Raheem had one good season. And that was with a team that did not have nearly as much talent as this team does.
Remember when Raheem was HC and we went to San Fran and beat them 21-0?
Remember when Raheem was HC and we went to San Fran and beat them 21-0?
Then again, they also lost 48-3.At the end of the day, they both suck.
Thankfully the Bucs don't have a head coach who gets obliterated by good teams like Raheem Morris anymore.
Well and I thought the offense given who we have and what they have played an ok game. The defense OTOH was awful despite some nice individual games.
Well and I thought the offense given who we have and what they have played an ok game. The defense OTOH was awful despite some nice individual games.
Glennon was obviously better in the hurry up. They should put him in that position more IMO. Teams like the Broncos almost never huddle up, Peyton calls the play at the line. Glennon may be more suited to that kind of tempo.I can't pile on the D too much. They were out there way too long, they were gassed. Way too many 3 and outs by Glennon and co.
It is easy to see how an argument could occur in determining which coach (and their staffs) was worse. Just sayin' guys...
Was there a part of this team that didn't need a complete makeover when schiano took over? Punter/kicker/Long Snapper (thanks Calico)? Anything else?
How did Schiano start 6-4?
Poor attempt at deflection. Answer the question.
The question is asinine, and the answer irrelevant. Of course the roster needed an overhaul. Morris coached the youngest and cheapest team in the NFL for three seasons in a row.
So you are saying that in 3 years of drafting and developing young players through the draft Morris failed. Thank you for your confirmation, but he did bring in a punter and a kicker.