If Clowney is there at 6, Atlanta WILL draft him.
I really doubt that Smith and Tedford will hitch their success/failure to Glennon. Just a thought...
If Clowney is there at 6, Atlanta WILL draft him.
Been saying the same thing. If only we had won one less game... We'd have a chance at him or Manziel.
I'm a fan of this kid, I think he could be a stud in the NFL. He needs to work on ball placement, but general accuracy is there, if that makes sense. He's not a finished product by any stretch, but I'd love to see him on the Bucs.
I think Hundley will go #1 overall.He's too much of a prototype for teams not to believe that he can be a marquee guy once they train him up. That'll be especially true for a team with a QB "guru" as a coach, which now fits the Texans. Bridgewater may be better at the mental elements of the game and with his accuracy, but he doesn't possess Hundley's strength, size, running ability, and potential durability. The nental elements can be taught (according to those who believe they can coach him up); you can't teach his physical gifts. The only negatives that would keep him from the #1 spot are (1) character and/or off field concerns and (2) a belief that his inaccuracy isn't fixable. Once fans see Hundley, though, especially next to Bridgewater, then Hundley will be the guy they want.
Draft him and play Glennon while Tedford coaches him up for a year? Trade Glennon next offseason?
Ideally. Its looking like a long shot though that he slips to #7 though.
McCown as the vet, Hundley as the understudy... ;)
if that means we get Matthews then HOORAY!!! Otherwise, it sucks. I hate Atlanta.
Hundley reminds me a lot of Freeman coming out of college..
He'll go #1 overall.He's too much of a prototype for teams not to believe that he can be a marquee guy once they train him up. That'll be especially true for a team with a QB "guru" as a coach, which now fits the Texans. Bridgewater may be better at the mental elements of the game and with his accuracy, but he doesn't possess Hundley's strength, size, running ability, and potential durability. The nental elements can be taught (according to those who believe they can coach him up); you can't teach his physical gifts. The only negatives that would keep him from the #1 spot are (1) character and/or off field concerns and (2) a belief that his inaccuracy isn't fixable. Once fans see Hundley, though, especially next to Bridgewater, then Hundley will be the guy they want.
Good point. Hundley has the highest upside of any QB in this draft class. I still don't see him overtaking Teddy Bridgewater though because he's more consistent and more accurate. Plus, he's the safer pick because he's more experienced.Hundley might go #2 to the Rams depending what happens in FA. Or they could go Sammy Watkins to fill the void for a #1 WR. It'll be an interesting off-season to watch that's for sure.
He'll go #1 overall.He's too much of a prototype for teams not to believe that he can be a marquee guy once they train him up. That'll be especially true for a team with a QB "guru" as a coach, which now fits the Texans. Bridgewater may be better at the mental elements of the game and with his accuracy, but he doesn't possess Hundley's strength, size, running ability, and potential durability. The nental elements can be taught (according to those who believe they can coach him up); you can't teach his physical gifts. The only negatives that would keep him from the #1 spot are (1) character and/or off field concerns and (2) a belief that his inaccuracy isn't fixable. Once fans see Hundley, though, especially next to Bridgewater, then Hundley will be the guy they want.
Good point. Hundley has the highest upside of any QB in this draft class. I still don't see him overtaking Teddy Bridgewater though because he's more consistent and more accurate. Plus, he's the safer pick because he's more experienced.Hundley might go #2 to the Rams depending what happens in FA. Or they could go Sammy Watkins to fill the void for a #1 WR. It'll be an interesting off-season to watch that's for sure.
Det,I can tell you that St. Louis isn't taking a QB at #2. Fisher has already stated that Bradford is his guy. Matthews is their pick. Or they will trade down.
I think I would rather have Bortles then Hundley
Bortles, Hundley, Bridgewater, Manziel, Carr all could go in the top 10. That would be a historic run on QBs. Are we going to be in on that?
I want him about as much as I want I want Bortles. So if he's there in the 4th, let's take the project.
He'll go #1 overall.He's too much of a prototype for teams not to believe that he can be a marquee guy once they train him up. That'll be especially true for a team with a QB "guru" as a coach, which now fits the Texans. Bridgewater may be better at the mental elements of the game and with his accuracy, but he doesn't possess Hundley's strength, size, running ability, and potential durability. The nental elements can be taught (according to those who believe they can coach him up); you can't teach his physical gifts. The only negatives that would keep him from the #1 spot are (1) character and/or off field concerns and (2) a belief that his inaccuracy isn't fixable. Once fans see Hundley, though, especially next to Bridgewater, then Hundley will be the guy they want.
Good point. Hundley has the highest upside of any QB in this draft class. I still don't see him overtaking Teddy Bridgewater though because he's more consistent and more accurate. Plus, he's the safer pick because he's more experienced.Hundley might go #2 to the Rams depending what happens in FA. Or they could go Sammy Watkins to fill the void for a #1 WR. It'll be an interesting off-season to watch that's for sure.
Det,I can tell you that St. Louis isn't taking a QB at #2. Fisher has already stated that Bradford is his guy. Matthews is their pick. Or they will trade down.
really? That's surprising. I must have missed that. Cool, I can see them taking Matthews because Saffold is a FA. They got Jake Long though at LT, but taking a RT in the top 5 isn't a ridiculous idea anymore so I guess that's an option as well.
