Needless to say, most of the Lovie hate is coming from the Schiano apologists. Big surprise. 4-12 was good enough for them with Schiano, but his successor better damn well be perfect!!!!
+1
Needless to say, most of the Lovie hate is coming from the Schiano apologists. Big surprise. 4-12 was good enough for them with Schiano, but his successor better damn well be perfect!!!!
Its not just Schiano fans. I think those that don't want Lovie are the couch GM/HCs that think they have all the answers for every front office position, draft pick, 53-man roster, and play call that anyone who does not match "their" pick is considered a waste and will set this franchise back decades, if not a century.
Needless to say, most of the Lovie hate is coming from the Schiano apologists. Big surprise.
You mean like some of the biggest Glennon haters were Freeman apologists?:-)
Who hates Glennon? Certainly not I.
I hope they hire Smith or someone else before they even entertain the thought of interviewing Gary Kubiak. Hopefully the reports are false that he is even on their radar. I can't believe anyone would even be considering "Mr. It's on Me" and "I have no idea how to fix it". I threw up a little when I saw that report last night.
Rooney Rule anyone?
yup...OBD
First interview and hopefully the last.
Rooney Rule anyone?
Every time a black guy is interviewed this is said ....it does the opposite of that the NFL intends . All it does is demean the black candidates.It would be like a rule saying that you had to draft a white player every draft . Every time we picked a white guy everyone would just say , " well he's just the token white guy, he isn't that good" . Demeans the player's worth , just as it demeans the black coaches worth.If I was a black guy I wouldn't want this stupid ass rule in place. It's insulting.
How in the world could "most" of anything come from Schiano fans? There were like 4 of them here.
I agree DJ, but what is more ignorant is claiming a coach that took a team to the Super Bowl (with Grossman no less) and has a .563 winning % is a "Rooney Rule" interview
How in the world could "most" of anything come from Schiano fans?
That's easyAnyone who criticized Freeman = Schianapoligist. Anyone who defended anything Schiano did = Schianapologist. Anyone that called cbw out for any of his nonsense = Schianapologist.
Schianofreedomsullisheridanorvopoligists?Supercalifragilisticexpialschianopologists!
How in the world could "most" of anything come from Schiano fans?
That's easyAnyone who criticized Freeman = Schianapoligist. Anyone who defended anything Schiano did = Schianapologist. Anyone that called cbw out for any of his nonsense = Schianapologist.
Lol well I think I hit 3/4 of those. I was on board for Rah and I also think Glennon is legit. No Peyton Manning but he won't get us into trouble. I guess I am just optimistic. I will say that I do not disagree with the decision to get rid of said coaches. And I would be a bold face liar if I said Lovie wasn't a **CENSORED** good coach and what we needed to help our team both heal and take the next step forward, not to mention bringing the fans back into the fold. However if my track record supporting Rah, Freeman and Schiano is any indication, I am toying with the idea of joining the trolls and pulling my support if it means Lovie is the one to lead us to the promise land. I will gladly eat turd if it meant the success of this team. Pride doesn't pay the bills.
"I will gladly eat turd if it meant the success of this team. Pride doesn't pay the bills."I don't think eating turds pays the bills either.
People who hate Lovie are people who think we must have an offensive-minded HC and an elite QB in order to win.
