You're asking me to respond to something you made up.
Actually, I’m not.
JC made a comment about Jensen regarding the All-22 he watched.
You jumped in and essentially mocked him.
Since you’ve now brought your film breakdown acumen from the now-defunct cove, I simply asked you to give us your film breakdown on Jensen’s performance.
I’ve asked multiple times.
You keep dodging.
It’s not that difficult.
DH, I mocked JC for moving the ball on Jensen. Anyone can read that. Not for his play against the Cowboys.
This is now your umpteenth post NOT addressing your ACTUAL . . in text posted here .. . actual also READABLE slide on Arians offense. Anyone can read that too.
More importantly though then anyone reading any of that nonsense is THAT YOU know you made that slide and YOU (like Buggsy) like to call people "Nancy" and "Soy Boys" and stuff like that . . which makes you a hilariously fragile hypocrite on this issue ESPECIALLY when your love sonnet to Buggsy commends him for owning up mistakes (surprised your computer didn't blow up when you type that -lol)
So, type any kind of fiction you want, but we both know the truth. I am just pointing it out in response to your invitation. That you cannot stop inviting me is telling . . . and funny.
It would take less words and posts to back up what you say, but you aren't capable. It's patently obvious, and has been with your ignorant takes for years.
Instead of admitting as much, you slither around per your usual. You'll post 300 more times in this thread without actually accepting the challenge. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
Weeks ago I said even if Jensen was able to play he should be the odd man out in the playoffs. Even with Leverett injured that was true. Hainsey should have been the center for multiple reasons, even not 100%. The interior OL had settled in nicely by the end of the season. Leverett was playing well, Hainsey was adequate and Mason was fine. There is a negative perception of Leverett because of his draft status and how he started off the year behind Goedeke but he was the biggest surprise this year and if he had been a 2nd round pick like Goedeke everyone would be saying how great he is.
As for the 10-2 comment. The offensive formations and 3rd down play calling killed the Bucs season. Based on the evidence that this were not issues 2019-2021 but were issues in 2022, I conclude the issue was the absence of Arians' "red pen". Also, there was a comment by David on Amazon before the Ravens game about players showing up late to meetings/practice. If Arians was the coach I think we beat GB, Carolina, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and probably even Cincinnati.
Hainsey should have been the center for multiple reasons, even not 100%
He had a pretty serious hamstring injury. Honestly, I was surprised he was even active. I don't know what his percentage was, but I wouldn't guess any higher than 75%.
Weeks ago I said even if Jensen was able to play he should be the odd man out in the playoffs
Right, which shows your bias. You are wanting an injured to Hainsey to play over a healthy Jensen.
You're free to be biased, but don't expect everyone else to act like you aren't
Hainsey should have been the center for multiple reasons, even not 100%
He had a pretty serious hamstring injury. Honestly, I was surprised he was even active. I don't know what his percentage was, but I wouldn't guess any higher than 75%.
Weeks ago I said even if Jensen was able to play he should be the odd man out in the playoffs
Right, which shows your bias. You are wanting an injured to Hainsey to play over a healthy Jensen.
You're free to be biased, but don't expect everyone else to act like you aren't
You can't call Jensen "healthy". And I am biased because I know Jensen is a fraud.
You can't call Jensen "healthy".
Can I call him more "healthy" than the guy that injured his hamstring the previous week?
And I am biased because I know Jensen is a fraud.
Precisely. It wouldn't have mattered if Jensen had played flawlessly, you would have said he sucked.
Jensen looked like a guy that hadn't played live football in year. Imagine that.
You can't call Jensen "healthy".
Can I call him more "healthy" than the guy that injured his hamstring the previous week?
And I am biased because I know Jensen is a fraud.
Precisely. It wouldn't have mattered if Jensen had played flawlessly, you would have said he sucked.
Jensen looked like a guy that hadn't played live football in year. Imagine that.
But he didn't played flawlessly, he sucked. If Hainsey was able to dress then he should have played. They played Jensen for theater and it was a clusterfuck.
Lol
They played Jensen for theater
And great theater, it was. Solid analysis. Tough to argue with this one...
DH - I disagree with BC a lot lately specific to football, but saying Biggs owns his mistakes is a comically bad take.
Comically bad
And I AGREE with Biggs on 95% of football takes.
But he has never, and I mean NEVER admitted he was wrong even over something so trivial as changing a grammatical error.
Cmon man
But he has never, and I mean NEVER admitted he was wrong even over something so trivial as changing a grammatical error.
Of course, I did.
I'll admit, it was after you were foolish enough to get trolled for a dozen-or-so posts. But you were too funny not to troll on that one. Hell, it still bothers you.
DH - I disagree with BC a lot lately specific to football, but saying Biggs owns his mistakes is a comically bad take.
Comically bad
And I AGREE with Biggs on 95% of football takes.
But he has never, and I mean NEVER admitted he was wrong even over something so trivial as changing a grammatical error.
Cmon man
EVEN FUNNIER . .. Buggsy and now DH are so eager to be hilarious internet bullies that earlier in this thread DH and Buggsy (no doubt upset over some other thing) are actually posting about me "refusing to back up" something I never posted (LMAO) only to have Buggsy LATER in the same thread MAKE THE SAME POINT I ACTUALLY DID POST in responding to JC initially.
I mean you want to talk about comical psychotherapy needed. Buggsy is so mind-f---ed by my posts that even when he agrees with me he wants to jump on with DH who is making a false point about film LMAO. Buggsy is that m--f'ed precisely because -- AS FIRE CORRECTLY POINTS OUT - not only does Buggsy NEVER admit his error he hilariously tries to call other people dumb, soy boys, simpletons etc.
what a funny mess and a VERY CLEAR indication why there is often so little traffic here. You're NOT a "simpleton" or a "soy boy" if you disagree with Buggsy or DH
DH know this FROM FIRE is 100% is true -- "But [Buggsy] has never, and I mean NEVER admitted he was wrong even over something so trivial as changing a grammatical error - that is why he went with the gaslighting about it. Comical trolling, especially while calling another poster a "Nancy" for slow walking back his point (something DH you do in this thread)
Its just football
But he has never, and I mean NEVER admitted he was wrong even over something so trivial as changing a grammatical error.
Of course, I did.
I'll admit, it was after you were foolish enough to get trolled for a dozen-or-so posts. But you were too funny not to troll on that one. Hell, it still bothers you.
Buggsy, was Rand Paul in the infield during the congressional baseball shooting, AS YOU INSISTED PREVIOUSLY?
here's your chance . . .BIG GUY
I have about 4-5 more I can give you if that one does not suit :-)
On the Jensen thing, the fact that the Bucs felt overall there best option was a ZERO playing time, just coming off serious injury Jensen OVER a recently injured BUT ACTIVE Hainsey provides a window into the Bucs thoughts about their chances against Dallas.
You can try to dismiss that ultimate choice as BAD COACHING but you have to at least know there would've been a lot of discussion about it and those discussions would've included BRADY. Jensen is on the field as proof that he is a soldier and a leader NOT as a definitive statement that he is 100% (lmao) and that everyone should expect that kind of performance. My post at the news is actually raising the alarm about the choice, not saying he's going to perform outstanding that's what makes the DH/Buggsy bullspit so funny
Most importantly the Bucs lose BECAUSE THEY ARE 8-9 and Dallas is pretty damn good. OUR DEFENSE got dog walked three times EARLY IN THE GAME and Brady threw an unnecessary and UNCHARACTERISTIC RZ interception (after a fake handoff, no less lol).
