Freeman was the F situation
So why did they lose 17 consecutive games when he wasn't the QB?
You failed math pretty hard didn't you?
Last guy who tried me hasn't been seen since.
con·sec·u·tive adjective k?n-?se-ky?-tiv, -k?-tiv: following one after the other in a series : following each other without interruptionYou don't even understand your own language so I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be scared of.
stu-pid adjective / stoo-pidnot intelligent : having or showing a lack of ability to learn and understand thingsi.e. This thread, since its inception, has been stupid.
JC is right. The Bucs lost the last 4 games of 2008 with Garcia and Griese. They lost the first 7 games of 2009 with Leftwich and Josh Johnson. They lost the one game Johnson started in 2011. Finally, they lost the first 5 games Mike Glennon started. Between week 13 of the 2008 season and week 10 of 2013, the Bucs lost 17 consecutive games not started by Josh Freeman.
JC is right. The Bucs lost the last 4 games of 2008 with Garcia and Griese. They lost the first 7 games of 2009 with Leftwich and Josh Johnson. They lost the one game Johnson started in 2011. Finally, they lost the first 5 games Mike Glennon started. Between week 13 of the 2008 season and week 10 of 2013, the Bucs lost 17 consecutive games not started by Josh Freeman.
It doesn't mean what you think it means.1. (of a narrative, account, etc) following chronological sequence2. following one another without interruption; successive
JC is right. The Bucs lost the last 4 games of 2008 with Garcia and Griese. They lost the first 7 games of 2009 with Leftwich and Josh Johnson. They lost the one game Johnson started in 2011. Finally, they lost the first 5 games Mike Glennon started. Between week 13 of the 2008 season and week 10 of 2013, the Bucs lost 17 consecutive games not started by Josh Freeman.
Also I find it funny you had nothing to say to my other response. Thus proving you're trying, but failing to prove me wrong in some way.
Just give it up, it's a fact. They lost 17 games in a row, consecutive, whatever, when he wasn't the QB, but yet so many believe he was problem. That's damning evidence. As is the fact that in the last 8 games of 2010 and middle 8 of 2012 he threw 32 TDs and 4 INTs and they only went 9-7. On a team that had their chit together they would have been 13-3, 14-2, etc and in the playoffs both seasons.
Can we just blame Obama and move on?
If Kaep sucks, then some of you guys need to retire from this message board. For your, and OUR, benefit.
You're so late to the argument. Nobody that has posted recently thinks he sucks. The consensus is that he is an average passer who is dangerous because of his legs. Without his legs he is just an average QB.
That's like saying Calvin Johnson is an average receiver without his height and speed. Players aren't defined by their individual skill sets; they're defined by their total skill sets. And with his legs, Kaepernick has a very difficult to defend set of skills.
That's cool, but still doesn't change the fact he is an average passer. I said he is good with his legs and average with his arm. I never said he sucks. So I'm not sure what your point was. Or are you just trying to argue with me just to argue?
You certainly sound like you're trying to disparage him or take something away from him because he doesn't play a certain way. If not, no harm.
Just give it up, it's a fact. They lost 17 games in a row, consecutive, whatever, when he wasn't the QB, but yet so many believe he was problem. That's damning evidence. As is the fact that in the last 8 games of 2010 and middle 8 of 2012 he threw 32 TDs and 4 INTs and they only went 9-7. On a team that had their chit together they would have been 13-3, 14-2, etc.
But it's not a fact if you're using the wrong words. You can tell you're a Freeman fan because your lack of knowledge and understanding. Maybe you would like to take up a drug addiction and party instead of working? That way you could fit in with your boyfriend Freeman. Freeman never made the playoffs did he? I don't care what he did in 2012 when he was complete garbage more recently. Bring up 2012 or any other year and live in the past. That's cool, but guess what? This is the NFL it doesn't ,matter what you've done it matters what you have done lately. So let's take a moment to remember the last thing Freeman did. Missed team meetings, missed team photos, constantly late, and lost every game this year. 0-4, 42.9% completion rate, 761 yards, 2 touchdowns, 4 interceptions, and a QB rating of 52.6. Hey Michael Vick was pretty good back in the day maybe we should give him a call, eh? Live in the past and that is where you will die.
You certainly sound like you're trying to disparage him or take something away from him because he doesn't play a certain way. If not, no harm.
Pointing out his flaws while pointing out his strengths as well = trying to take something away from him? Pretty sure that is what coaches and scouts do every day. Welcome to the NFL.
Freeman was the F situation
So why did they lose 17 consecutive games when he wasn't the QB?
So what, he broke a few losing streaks. Big deal. He was at the helm for a good amount of losing streaks too. Excuse me if I can't celebrate his mediocrity like you do.
Freeman was the F situation
So why did they lose 17 consecutive games when he wasn't the QB?
You failed math pretty hard didn't you?
Last guy who tried me hasn't been seen since.
Freeman?
Yeah I still think throwing at Sherman in that situation was retarded, especially using Michael Crabtree. You have Vernon Davis and Anquan Boldin who are not being guarded by Richard freaking Sherman yet you go after Richard Sherman with Michael Crabtree.Atrocious decision.
I'll break it down for the "simpletons".As you can see Crabtree DID NOT have a step on Sherman. Also notice the safety watching Kaepernick and turning his hips. Meaning he has looked off the safety. With his arm it's an easy touchdown to Boldin.
The safety at that point is totally committed. With the arm Kaepernick has the safety won't recover in time to make a play. Throw it to Boldin for an easy touchdown. Again Sherman still right there with Crabtree. 
Throw is made and Sherman still running with Crabtree.
Sherman still in great position.
The ball was thrown too far inside so Sherman clearly had the best path to the ball. The ONLY way this was a catch was a great throw to the outside.
I would love to hear the "simpletons" and couch potatoes thoughts on how it wasn't a bad decision and throw. Keep in mind this is Richard Sherman the best fade cover corner in the league.
How about the guy standing at the top of the screen with nobody within 10 yards of him? They still had over 30 seconds and a time out. That guy could have gained at least 8 yards and went out of bounds. If not him, then how about run? If he scrambles to the left he probably has a first down. He had ran wild on them all day....why not then?It was a bad decision and bad throw. Sh!t happens.
